Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM to Kill Pontiac Monday?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #61  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
People keep throwing out the China argument. Might be what GM is thinking, but it is wrong.

Ah well. There will still be companies that make sporty and visually appealing cars. They are all German or Japanese though, guess I will have to learn to like buying 'foreign'.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #62  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
People keep throwing out the China argument. Might be what GM is thinking, but it is wrong.

Ah well. There will still be companies that make sporty and visually appealing cars. They are all German or Japanese though, guess I will have to learn to like buying 'foreign'.
Fords got some nice looking cars man..the new SHO.. heck there is a Edge I saw out there that almost had the SVT look to it..and not to forget the Mustang

Last edited by Caps94ZODG; Apr 26, 2009 at 10:54 AM.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #63  
Derek M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 538
Does it strike anyone as odd as to why GM would stand up a impromptu press release on Friday, shooting down the speculation of the supposed Monday's impending Pontiac death announcement? If the speculation is true why even release a statement at all? What benefit does denying it on Friday and and then confirming it on Monday serve?
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #64  
TallicA32's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 140
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Derek M
Does it strike anyone as odd as to why GM would stand up a impromptu press release on Friday, shooting down the speculation of the supposed Monday's impending Pontiac death announcement? If the speculation is true why even release a statement at all? What benefit does denying it on Friday and and then confirming it on Monday serve?
Link?
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #65  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Derek M
Does it strike anyone as odd as to why GM would stand up a impromptu press release on Friday, shooting down the speculation of the supposed Monday's impending Pontiac death announcement? If the speculation is true why even release a statement at all? What benefit does denying it on Friday and and then confirming it on Monday serve?
Maybe they're still debating/coordinating how much they can say about the future of Pontiac. Unless they actually sell of the rights to the Pontiac name (which I believe very unlikely), they will have the option to bring back the name later like they did with the Camaro.

At least one automotive analyst agrees with me...

http://www.detnews.com/article/20090...o+dump+Pontiac

Pontiacs have had a role in popular culture. A Pontiac convertible was used by Lucy and Ricky in episodes of "I Love Lucy" in a drive across the country. Pontiac Firebird Trans Ams were featured in the 1977 film "Smokey and the Bandit."

Those muscle car models are a key part of Pontiac's legacy.

"That was the high-water mark," said Jim Hall of 2953 Analytics in Birmingham. "They were overstated for the market but found some resonance from buyers who wanted cars like that."

He discounted any notion that Pontiac would permanently disappear and said it could emerge once the market rebounds as a niche brand of one or two models.

"Killing Pontiac is probably the wrong word," Hall said. "Putting it to sleep is probably far more accurate. Don't count Pontiac out forever, but it's definitely going fallow for a while. You'll see something from Pontiac in the future providing you see something from General Motors in the future."
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #66  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
That would be preferable to me, if GM were to announce that Pontiac is going to "sleep" for awhile, rather than just being killed.

Of course, if it ever came back, it'd have to be as a relevant, profitable, product or line.

And that's the tough part. Because frankly, taking direction from the loudest remaining "Pontiac Enthusiasts" is a dead end. If it weren't, the GTO and G8 would have saved Pontiac. Let's face it, the current enthusiast community - as we know them now - cannot support Pontiac.

If one day Pontiac is to return, it will have to be remade by people of vision and focus. And maybe that will mean creating a whole new enthusiast base and leaving the old one behind.

Last edited by Z284ever; Apr 26, 2009 at 12:21 PM.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #67  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Let's face it, the current enthusiast community - as we know them now - cannot support Pontiac.
I beg to differ and so will those that have made the Pontiac G8 the best selling retail Pontiac of March '09. It's just starting to gain traction and shows that Pontiac enthusiasts know what the brand should be.

G8, Solstice and a coupe.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #68  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Originally Posted by Z284ever
That would be preferable to me, if GM were to announce that Pontiac is going to "sleep" for awhile, rather than just being killed.

Of course, if it ever came back, it'd have to be as a relevant, profitable, product or line.

And that's the tough part. Because frankly, taking direction from the loudest remaining "Pontiac Enthusiasts" is a dead end. If it weren't, the GTO and G8 would have saved Pontiac. Let's face it, the current enthusiast community - as we know them now - cannot support Pontiac.

If one day Pontiac is to return, it will have to be remade by people of vision and focus. And maybe that will mean creating a whole new enthusiast base and leaving the old one behind.
Way off.

If for no other reason than the simple fact that regardless of how popular the GTO and G8 could have been, Holden could only build a comparatively small number no matter the demand.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #69  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by Josh452
G8, Solstice and a coupe.
I think you are right. Even if they don't get everyone that had or wanted a '77 Trans Am there could be room for nice sporty cars with profit at low-moderate production volumes.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #70  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Yeah, I know it's not what you guys want to hear...


Originally Posted by Josh452
I beg to differ and so will those that have made the Pontiac G8 the best selling retail Pontiac of March '09. It's just starting to gain traction and shows that Pontiac enthusiasts know what the brand should be.

G8, Solstice and a coupe.

And G8's sales have increased because dealers are dealing and GM added $3 grand on it's hood, don't you think Josh? Even with that, you certainly can't call the G8 a goldmine for Pontiac. It was a similar story with the GTO. There is a lesson in there somewhere. The lesson to me is that Pontiac performance cars have a very sensitive price point to those who currently consider them. Even more so than Ford, Dodge or Chevy.

Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
Way off.

If for no other reason than the simple fact that regardless of how popular the GTO and G8 could have been, Holden could only build a comparatively small number no matter the demand.

Bob, your not saying that restricted production volume has had anything to do with how popular the G8 and GTO are? I know that you know, it took Pontiac 5 model years to sell 3 model years of GTO's and Holden has made twice as many G8's as Pontiac has been able to sell in the past year.

I don't want you guys to misunderstand me. If I were in the market for a new daily driver TODAY, the G8 would be at the top of my list. But what we consider traditional Pontiac enthusiasts will simply not support the brand adequately. Sure, you guys, (and others on this site) bought NEW Pontiacs and supported the brand, but far more are just big talkers who won't cough up the cash when Pontiac delivers what they've been asking for. You can't run a brand that way - as we've seen demonstrated.

Last edited by Z284ever; Apr 26, 2009 at 04:05 PM.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #71  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yeah, I know it's not what you guys want to hear...





And G8's sales have increased because dealers are dealing and GM added $3 grand on it's hood, don't you think Josh? Even with that, you certainly can't call the G8 a goldmine for Pontiac. It was a similar story with the GTO. There is a lesson in there somewhere. The lesson to me is that Pontiac performance cars have a very sensitive price point to those who currently consider them. Even more so than Ford, Dodge or Chevy.




Bob, your not saying that restricted production volume has had anything to do with how popular the G8 and GTO are? I know that you know, it took Pontiac 5 model years to sell 3 model years of GTO's and Holden has made twice as many G8's as Pontiac has been able to sell in the past year.

I don't want you guys to misunderstand me. If I were in the market for a new daily driver TODAY, the G8 would be at the top of my list. But what we consider traditional Pontiac enthusiasts will simply not support the brand adequately. Sure, you guys, (and others on this site) bought NEW Pontiacs and supported the brand, but far more are just big talkers who won't cough up the cash when Pontiac delivers what they've been asking for. You can't run a brand that way - as we've seen demonstrated.
No, but I do think the case for a niche brand is actually quite strong and that both the GTO and G8 bolster that idea. GM has half-assed Pontiac for a very long time now - even to the point of undermining each new product with absurd announcements and decsions. Yet, even in the face of such sabotage, both the GTO and the G8 have shown resilience and have a fervent following.

My point is that I believe that you drew the wrong conclusions in your earlier post. No, the GTO and the G8 could not "save" the old volume version of Pontiac, but they sure as hell could underpin a new performance niche version. Those two cars, along with the Solstice, are a strong foundation for such a brand to grow from. GM's inconsitency and ouright reversals of the plans for Pontiac are the root cause of the current results.

I'd wager that a great many individuals on this site and others could develop a far more coherent plan than GM at this point.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #72  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
I'd wager that a great many individuals on this site and others could develop a far more coherent plan than GM at this point.
Oh yeah, it's so easy to spend other people's billions by typing out forum posts.

The problem with any muscle niche business plan for Pontiac is "Chevy can sell these cars just as well and with lower overhead."

And to counter that you would need marketing data, cost projections, factory overhead, and a whole bunch of other hard numbers that nobody on a forum has available. And you would still need to convince GM's bankers to agree to it when they would rather just part-out GM for cash.

Also I think it was concluded that the GTO did not sell to "Pontiac enthusiasts". Lutz pointed out the car sold poorly in Firebird towns and ended up with a high import conversion percentage. I suspect the same thing is true of the G8. The buyers aren't Pontiac guys randomly walking into the dealership, people have heard about the car and are seeking it out.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #73  
Derek M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 538
Originally Posted by TallicA32
Link?
http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayS...74&docid=53902
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #74  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Originally Posted by flowmotion
Oh yeah, it's so easy to spend other people's billions by typing out forum posts.

The problem with any muscle niche business plan for Pontiac is "Chevy can sell these cars just as well and with lower overhead."

And to counter that you would need marketing data, cost projections, factory overhead, and a whole bunch of other hard numbers that nobody on a forum has available. And you would still need to convince GM's bankers to agree to it when they would rather just part-out GM for cash.

Also I think it was concluded that the GTO did not sell to "Pontiac enthusiasts". Lutz pointed out the car sold poorly in Firebird towns and ended up with a high import conversion percentage. I suspect the same thing is true of the G8. The buyers aren't Pontiac guys randomly walking into the dealership, people have heard about the car and are seeking it out.
None of which changes the fact that GM's handling of Pontiac has been wholly incoherent.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 06:44 PM
  #75  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
None of which changes the fact that GM's handling of Pontiac has been wholly incoherent.

No arguments there. And it was a failure of imagination and leadership, not a shortage of hardware.

Imagine if John DeLorean were around and Rick Wagoner told him, " John, we're going to give you the best W-car ever, you'll have access to the Holden Monaro and Commodore to do with as you please, we'll create a new 2 seater sportscar architecture for you to use and you'll get exclusive use of a coupe and convertible version of Epsilon, you'll also get a manual trans version - again, exclusively. Now, go make a Pontiac Division out of that"

How do you think DeLorean would do?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.