Full specs on the 2010 SRX.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Too much torque for a FWD.
I don't know. If you compare the Saab 9-3 with that engine to cars with the 3.6 DI, the 3.6 gets better fuel mileage, and it makes more power.
I'm non-plussed about that 2.8 turbo. Here's a test of a Saab that has it.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
It's not a DI engine. Maybe they have extra capacity that they need to use somewhere?
I don't know. If you compare the Saab 9-3 with that engine to cars with the 3.6 DI, the 3.6 gets better fuel mileage, and it makes more power.
I'm non-plussed about that 2.8 turbo. Here's a test of a Saab that has it.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
It's not a DI engine. Maybe they have extra capacity that they need to use somewhere?
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 95
From: Columbus, OH
Registered User
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 535
From: Gotham City
That is indeed nice. So, this is a mix of Theta and epsilon? While the new 2010 equinox is not TE?
Also, anyone reading the post on the Equinox and SRX???? ALOT of domestic bashing from Tripleonefive and DrFill.
Also, anyone reading the post on the Equinox and SRX???? ALOT of domestic bashing from Tripleonefive and DrFill.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 4, 2014 11:56 AM