Dodge Challenger Super Stock Concept (video)
).At any rate, there's going to be a pretty large Mopar Catalogue section for this ride.
The Camaro is on an all-new platform that has not been developed yet. It is not a rehash of something else.
You can say Camaro is a rehash of a Holden Commodore. 
At any rate, having a car based on an chassis that's been around a few years has the benefit of coming into the world with an established partial aftermarket parts list.
Camaro is a year behind the Challenger.
We'll certainly see a production Challenger less than a year from now during the auto show season, and you can probally bet the farm that Chevrolet will have some version of Camaro. But within weeks after seeing it, you will be able to walk into the showroom and buy a Challenger. You're going to have to wait almost nearly another year to buy the Camaro.

At any rate, having a car based on an chassis that's been around a few years has the benefit of coming into the world with an established partial aftermarket parts list.
We'll certainly see a production Challenger less than a year from now during the auto show season, and you can probally bet the farm that Chevrolet will have some version of Camaro. But within weeks after seeing it, you will be able to walk into the showroom and buy a Challenger. You're going to have to wait almost nearly another year to buy the Camaro.
Last edited by guionM; Apr 20, 2007 at 11:39 AM.
Hahahaha...that's true...sorta. Not quite the same, but close, right? Good point regardless.
In light of that, does it wind up being a disadvantage compared to the Challenger because the Holden is overseas and the 300 is not?
At any rate, having a car based on an chassis that's been around a few years has the benefit of coming into the world with an established partial aftermarket parts list.
I could see a few disadvantages. Like them doing the testing down there for instance then bringing it back up here for production. Do you bring the engineers back here to make sure things go smoothly at first, or do you throw them into the next Holden project? In the big picture though that has to pale in comparison to leveraging global resources. To pull the best from your companies all over the world and get them to work together is much better. Both in assets and people/engineers. Dont know how much Chrysler is doing it, but GM seems to be well ahead of Ford. Honestly I think above all else. Leveraging global assets will give GM the best cars of the big 3 and some serious contenders. I think it will play a major part in turning the company around.
If GM had an active RWD platform that is worthy of putting the Camaro on now like DCX did for the Challenger we'd be see Chevy promote the car like they do. That being said showing the Camaro as a drag car at a track is not GM's style.
while that idea may bore you... there is a huge fanbase of transformers out there, along with a whole new group of people that may only casually remember the franchise but will go to movie, and see the awesome car that is the camaro concept... there's no denying that it'll be good publicity
All the manufacturers end up saying "this is just to show you what YOU could do to your own car". Uh huh with a million bucks and an engineering degree.

I love the Challenger and if it's not as over-inflated as most new "hot cars", I might get me one. If I don't, maybe I'll do like I did with the Camaro and get a real one (from back in the day).
Last edited by 3SuperSports; Apr 24, 2007 at 06:57 PM.
fanbase of transformers out there? That is Uber-gay
For those acting unimpressed, if it was the same video with a 5th gen Camaro instead of the Challenger you would be saying exactly the opposite.
That car is going to be such a hit, these new horsepower wars are going to be a blast!
For those acting unimpressed, if it was the same video with a 5th gen Camaro instead of the Challenger you would be saying exactly the opposite.
That car is going to be such a hit, these new horsepower wars are going to be a blast!


