Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:19 PM
  #16  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

A $40,000 Camaro is not needed when you can buy a $43,000 Vette

$40,000 GTO or Grand National is reasonable
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:23 PM
  #17  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Who says it needs to cost $40K to compete with GT500?
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #18  
Abidar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 325
From: NC STATE
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Damn right Z284ever
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #19  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

We don't need a Camaro to go head to head with the GT 500?......WHAT!? ..... I can't believe you think GM doesn't need a Camaro to go head to head with the GT 500. Ford already kicked Chevrolets A$$ with the Mustang. Sometimes I read stuff on this board and I can't believe what I just read.


As for Z/28 VS. SS if you know anything you know whats up
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #20  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Who says it needs to cost $40K to compete with GT500?
Hehehe, thats an easy one! The people who dream up the MSRP's. lol
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #21  
LT-14me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 799
From: Mass
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Originally Posted by DrewSG
The GT500 proves theres a market for it, so why not? I don't see a reason not to build a GT500 fighter.

Exactly, you can easily build a car that makes the same ammount of HP that the the gt500 does. If gm goes the S/C route it can easily be accomplished so why not? NA would be a little more difficult but since the ls2 already has 400hp 50+ more should be that hard to achieve.

DCX cars have the 6.1 425HP hemi, Ford has the 330ci S/C 450+hp motor, GM has the ls2 400hp.


I do agree that the SS should be the top model like it was even back in the 60's
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #22  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Originally Posted by LT-14me

I do agree that the SS should be the top model like it was even back in the 60's
Wrong... the Z/28 was, and before we get to this point ZL-1 was an engine designation. It would be like having a Camaro LS-1 as the top model.
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:46 PM
  #23  
AronZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,276
From: Chattanoga & Franklin
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

YES!!!! The Camaro has always been the faster car throughout the years.(okay, L98 IROC/Z28 vs 5.0 Mustang was a draw).
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #24  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Guy....YOU of all people start a Z/28 vs SS thread!?!!......Where's my pinking shears?!?

I know it's disguised as a Mustang beater thread, but you just HAD to pull out that old dead horse carcas again.....shame shame shame.....




Charlie's right, who says you gotta' spend $40 large to compete?

Hell, the Z06 is going to put the GT back on the trailer for less than half price.....so why not the Z/28 (yes, Z/28.....not some used on damned near every Chevy model SS moniker ) will have something for the Mustang elite....

Oh maybe it won't quite be it's equal in the horsepower wars....but in overall....read that again....OVERALL performance it should more than hold it's own.

Now, stop beatng the dust out of that tired old horse and tell me who's buying dinner in Detroit in January?
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #25  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Its possible to have the Z28 below the hand built GT500.
Engine is MUCH cheaper to produce (like a 6.2 or cammed 6.0) then the Ford SC'ed motor.
I mean...they got a 500hp, 3100lb RACE CAR UNDER 70k, with aluminum chassis, CF body pannels, and world class suspension and brakes...
I think we can get a 450hp Camaro for under 40k.
Cant say the same for Ford.
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:29 PM
  #26  
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 574
From: Richmond, TX
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Originally Posted by notgetleft
Because Ford doesn't have Corvette. Camaro can't *BE* mustang.

Damn. Someone gets it.

Here's what it boils down to. 2003 was the first year(in age of the corporate engine) that a stang ran faster than a Vette. That's pretty much like jumping over the fence and going to play with the big boys.

The GT500 is going to smoke the base C6.

I know this is all new territory, but get used to it. The SVT stangs play with Vettes. Any production Camaro that could take on the GT500 would also saw Vette sales off at the knees.

How do I sell a $45K Vette that's sitting right next to faster $35K Z/28?
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:31 PM
  #27  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

who said 40k?

Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
I know this is all new territory, but get used to it. The SVT stangs play with Vettes. Any production Camaro that could take on the GT500 would also saw Vette sales off at the knees.
ok, and then dodge comes along and drops off their fastest muscle car. Tell me what happens then?

The Camaro is then the lowest in the food chain.

Last edited by number77; Jun 27, 2005 at 11:37 PM.
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #28  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Huh???????? since when did a 5.3 cost the same as an LS2????? (internal cost)

Not even close.

I wouldn't want to build a Camaro that couldn't take on a Mustang.


that's all I'll say on that subject.


As to 'spin'........let's put it this way.....we were constrained (by financial) to two engines in the 4th gen. I'd say we did pretty well, wouldn't you, in terms of performance? Further, we kept stretching the LS1 power.....and offered factory warranted performance increases in the form of the SS and the SS with 335 and 345hp versions.

Finally.......when we SAID you got 325hp........you GOT MORE than 325hp.

Perhaps I'm a little sensitive tonite.................
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #29  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
How do I sell a $45K Vette that's sitting right next to faster $35K Z/28?

Have no fear a guy that can affor a Vette is not gonna look at a Camaro and niether is it the other way around. The only reason most people on this board will SETTLE for a Vette is because there is no Camaro .
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 11:39 PM
  #30  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Re: Do we really need a $40,000 Camaro that is as quick as the GT500?

Originally Posted by Red Planet

I wouldn't want to build a Camaro that couldn't take on a Mustang.


that's all I'll say on that subject.

Thank you!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.