hear hear!

 

I have read your posts, including the one you reciently removed with the reasons (excuses) they have for canceling the Camaro. They are very informative and great reads but you missed my point.

Why roll out a car that will need to be replaced in two years or directly end up competing with the camaro itself??

I just got back from vacation in Tampa and while i was there i spotted an awsome 67 convertible with a 454/4 speed. Thats how i see Camaro. An inexpensive, georgus car thats built to lead, not follow.

The new brass at GM are still making the same mistakes they made in the 80's (excluding the GTO, which gives me hope). I go into more but, i have to get to class.