Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

the chevy cobalt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #31  
2112's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 23
Re: the chevy cobalt

I think its a bad idea to only give it 205 hp and market it to the SRT-4 crowd. You can get the SRT for a little over $20K making it cheaper than the Cobalt and I think it wil have no problem out-performing it stock vs stock. The SRT will do the quarter in the high 13s and with a few hundred bucks worth of mods, you can get it into low to mid 13s. If they could have put the Cobalt out for about $17-$18K I think it may do better.
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #32  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: the chevy cobalt

You cant always base everything on 1/4 performance. Most compact car buyers want a car that handles as well, and if the Ion RL is any indication, the Cobalt SS should be quite the little pocket rocket.
Its little SC 2.0 motor will deffinatly have plenty of room to grow. I say the Cobalt SS will offer more for the money then just 1/4 performance. Interior is WORLDS better as well. I hope GM keeps up with this little car, especialy with the new Golf coming out, and much hyped Civic Si.
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 11:45 PM
  #33  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by 2112
I think its a bad idea to only give it 205 hp and market it to the SRT-4 crowd. You can get the SRT for a little over $20K making it cheaper than the Cobalt and I think it wil have no problem out-performing it stock vs stock. The SRT will do the quarter in the high 13s and with a few hundred bucks worth of mods, you can get it into low to mid 13s. If they could have put the Cobalt out for about $17-$18K I think it may do better.
All you Cobalt doubters will eat your words Once again , the 205 hp is underrated . Ions are putting close to that out at the wheels and the low rev limiter issue in the Ion's will be tuned out of the cobalt . The Cobalt is a light years better car than the $22K SRT-4 in all aspects and the forged ecotec in the cobalt will take alot more boost than its 12.5 psi stock . The SRT-4 may be a smidge faster stock , but sorry ....its a great motor in a absolute turd of a car . I mean it doesnt even look cool . My $22K is on the Cobalt , an attractive car , that handles and has near luxury levels of refinement . Thats the kinda bang for buck Im talkin bout . My opinions are based on the fact that I would never buy a car like this purely for straightline acceleration , that crosses the ugly inside and out neon completely off the list .
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 02:28 AM
  #34  
ProjectRS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 492
From: AK Ron
Re: the chevy cobalt

Im sick of waiting for my s/c SS
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 08:22 AM
  #35  
DrewSG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 627
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
All you Cobalt doubters will eat your words Once again , the 205 hp is underrated . Ions are putting close to that out at the wheels and the low rev limiter issue in the Ion's will be tuned out of the cobalt . The Cobalt is a light years better car than the $22K SRT-4 in all aspects and the forged ecotec in the cobalt will take alot more boost than its 12.5 psi stock . The SRT-4 may be a smidge faster stock , but sorry ....its a great motor in a absolute turd of a car . I mean it doesnt even look cool . My $22K is on the Cobalt , an attractive car , that handles and has near luxury levels of refinement . Thats the kinda bang for buck Im talkin bout . My opinions are based on the fact that I would never buy a car like this purely for straightline acceleration , that crosses the ugly inside and out neon completely off the list .
Ion Redlines put out about ~195FWHP while An SRT4 puts out ~230FWHP. In terms of ***** out performance, the SRT4 is still the best here. And it has tons of aftermarket support from Mopar alone. For everyday driving, I would no doubt pick the Cobalt SS. But to say it's lightyears ahead of the SRT4 in every aspect is a flawed, uninformed statement.
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #36  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: the chevy cobalt

The SRT-4 is no doubt the watermark as far as FWD performance, but until we get the SS, we'll have no real knowledge as to how it'll stack up. The SRT-4 is under rated....alot. Early word is the Cobalt SS will be underrated alot as well (25 horses is the rumor at the moment).

There's also gearing and torque curve to consider (superchargers have max low end torque far lower in the RPM range than turbos), so it's likely the SS will be quicker off the line.

There's also the feel of quality. Cobalt's interior is in a different league than Neon.

Finally, Neon is toast after this coming year. The replacement will be a Mitsu Mirage underneath & I believe there will be a different family of engines, and possibly a gap in SRT-4s replacement.

Unless Ford has something up their sleeve for Focus, Cobalt SS is likely to be the quickest domestic 4 banger till the Kappa turbos are out.
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #37  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by 2112
I think its a bad idea to only give it 205 hp and market it to the SRT-4 crowd. You can get the SRT for a little over $20K making it cheaper than the Cobalt and I think it wil have no problem out-performing it stock vs stock. The SRT will do the quarter in the high 13s and with a few hundred bucks worth of mods, you can get it into low to mid 13s. If they could have put the Cobalt out for about $17-$18K I think it may do better.
Cobalt is putting out around 197HP to the wheels which is about ~225HP at the engine. SRT-4 will be faster in the 1/4mi. but unless you are only buying the car for drag racing then the Cobalt will offer better EVERYTHING for the SAME money. (actually the Cobalt is $50 more, but you get more options)
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #38  
DrewSG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 627
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by guionM

Finally, Neon is toast after this coming year. The replacement will be a Mitsu Mirage underneath & I believe there will be a different family of engines, and possibly a gap in SRT-4s replacement.

Unless Ford has something up their sleeve for Focus, Cobalt SS is likely to be the quickest domestic 4 banger till the Kappa turbos are out.
I'm not sure, but I think I read somewhere about the next generation SRT4 stepping in the EVO/STI league. Supposed to be 300HP AWD.. which makes sense for Dodge to do
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #39  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by guionM
The SRT-4 is no doubt the watermark as far as FWD performance, but until we get the SS, we'll have no real knowledge as to how it'll stack up. The SRT-4 is under rated....alot. Early word is the Cobalt SS will be underrated alot as well (25 horses is the rumor at the moment).

There's also gearing and torque curve to consider (superchargers have max low end torque far lower in the RPM range than turbos), so it's likely the SS will be quicker off the line.

There's also the feel of quality. Cobalt's interior is in a different league than Neon.

Finally, Neon is toast after this coming year. The replacement will be a Mitsu Mirage underneath & I believe there will be a different family of engines, and possibly a gap in SRT-4s replacement.

Unless Ford has something up their sleeve for Focus, Cobalt SS is likely to be the quickest domestic 4 banger till the Kappa turbos are out.

You said Kappa turbo like it was a done thing. The Kappa cars really need a turbo power plant. I have had an itch to build a 4 banger but no 4 cyl cars meet my personal rules.

1. It must be domestic
2. It has to be RWD

I would also like A factory FI motor and dont like a transverse mouted mid engine rwd layout.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 10:19 AM
  #40  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by Evil Turbo SS
You said Kappa turbo like it was a done thing. The Kappa cars really need a turbo power plant...
LetLet me rephrase that & say that there's every indication in the world, and then plenty more, that Solstice will get a major power upgrade it's 2nd year.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 05:45 PM
  #41  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by DrewSG
I'm not sure, but I think I read somewhere about the next generation SRT4 stepping in the EVO/STI league. Supposed to be 300HP AWD.. which makes sense for Dodge to do
If Dodge would build a 2 door, the Z would have some company.
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:34 AM
  #42  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by robb4964
WRONG....Camaro failed becasue it was not marketed . One of the first things you learn in college , business class, is that marketing is 80% of sales . Working in a sales position myself in the past I know how effective it is .
The reason Mustang sold so well and Camaro didnt is becasue fro knows how and where to market the product . People wont buy something they no nothing about . You have to entice them anad bring out their desires with the positive facts of the porduct . Chevy never did this .
For the longest time you couldnt open a magazine without seeing a Mustang add..You got some smark cookies working in the ford Marketing Division . Chevy's boys where alseep .
Ever see a comercial expressing the power of the LS1 Camaro? Nope..How bout a SS commercial that got you thinkg...hmm..thats one bad *** ride! Chevy never bothered to attempt this . Advertising is expensive but in tight knit markets , its the only way to spread the word . Most of the people I know that didnt like Camaro's " Until they met me " knew absolutely nothing about them . They had no clue of the enormous amount of power a stock Camaro had and many where under the illusion that a GT or mainly anythuing else on the road considered to eb a sports car could take them.
People wont buy something they know nothing about . Most wont anyway .
Uhm, no...actually, I'm not wrong. Do a search on here for WHY the Camaro died. GM CHOSE not to market the car, because they knew it needed to go away. Do some research before babbling away about lack of advertising. True, the car was not marketed. Know what? I can't remember the last time I saw a Mustang TV ad either! The '05 commercials are coming out now, but it had been at least 3 years since I saw a Mustang ad, aside from Bill Ford talking about one in a FORD ad...not necessarily a MUSTANG ad.

Do some research before you tell people they're wrong. In this instance, it will surprise you WHY the car is dead.
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #43  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by Jason E
Uhm, no...actually, I'm not wrong. Do a search on here for WHY the Camaro died. GM CHOSE not to market the car, because they knew it needed to go away. Do some research before babbling away about lack of advertising. True, the car was not marketed. Know what? I can't remember the last time I saw a Mustang TV ad either! The '05 commercials are coming out now, but it had been at least 3 years since I saw a Mustang ad, aside from Bill Ford talking about one in a FORD ad...not necessarily a MUSTANG ad.

Do some research before you tell people they're wrong. In this instance, it will surprise you WHY the car is dead.
Dont be a Jerk about it . I have seen plenty of mustang adds over the last 4 years . Mach1's..GT's...in the back of car and driver and nearly every other car mag I read . So dont be a smart *** . If I hadnnt read it somewhere I wouldnt have made the claim .
What kind of sense does it make fr gm to say " Oh , gee , this car needs to go away , lets not advertise "
I have read it plenty of places that bad marketing killed the F-bod . Its not an opinion of mine , its something I have read numerous times over the years .
If I wasnt sure of it or hadnt read it from someone who edited a an article on it , I would not have said it .
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #44  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Re: the chevy cobalt

GM had firm plans in the mid 90's to axe the f-cars. If I am not mistaken, it was originally scheduled to end in 1998. Obviously, it got extended four years beyond that.

There was no need to spend millions of dollars to advertise a vehicle that was doomed.

BTW, stop pissing at each other about it.
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #45  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: the chevy cobalt

Originally Posted by JasonD
GM had firm plans in the mid 90's to axe the f-cars. If I am not mistaken, it was originally scheduled to end in 1998. Obviously, it got extended four years beyond that.

There was no need to spend millions of dollars to advertise a vehicle that was doomed.

BTW, stop pissing at each other about it.
I can see the point I guess .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.