C6 Z06 with headers
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 340
From: Roanoke,Virginia
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
[QUOTE=Chris 96 WS6]443rwhp baseline stock. 505 crank hp. That's a 13% driveline loss. If we assume the standard 15% then the Z05 is slightly underrated and should be more like 520 crank.[QUOTE]
Ont the run where they got that number the engine was heat soaked. With a cool engine it would probably be closer to 455-460 baseline.
Ont the run where they got that number the engine was heat soaked. With a cool engine it would probably be closer to 455-460 baseline.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Wow, looks like intake, headers, and tune will put you around 500whp. Not a bad deal.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
I seem to remember somebody here saying that longtubes + cam would add 100 hp to the Z06. Wait, that was me that said that.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
Yeah I want to see those dynos. I'm not buying it w/o documentation. That would represent an underrating of 100 hp...650 crank hp.
It should only take about 40 hp to make up for the extra 400 lbs of weight, so assuming the two cars 1/4 mile equally, the GT should be around the 485 rwhp stock range. Divide by 15% loss and that's right at 570, so 20hp underrated. Theoretically, of course
It should only take about 40 hp to make up for the extra 400 lbs of weight, so assuming the two cars 1/4 mile equally, the GT should be around the 485 rwhp stock range. Divide by 15% loss and that's right at 570, so 20hp underrated. Theoretically, of course
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,769
From: cinci
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
cool, looks like the newer Cobras will finally have some competition
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 319
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
And here is a thread that has a stock GT with 700 miles on it.
http://forums.clubsi.com/showflat.php?Number=5519275
Just for information purposes. Any and all arguments that this will cause are not my fault.
http://forums.clubsi.com/showflat.php?Number=5519275
Just for information purposes. Any and all arguments that this will cause are not my fault.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by Omegalock
And here is a thread that has a stock GT with 700 miles on it.
http://forums.clubsi.com/showflat.php?Number=5519275
Just for information purposes. Any and all arguments that this will cause are not my fault.
http://forums.clubsi.com/showflat.php?Number=5519275
Just for information purposes. Any and all arguments that this will cause are not my fault.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,769
From: cinci
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by SMUJeremy
They just pulled 492.2 rwhp 472.3 rwtq after chaging to full redline synthetics. That car is a BEAST of potential. An intake/tune will be well into 500RWHP. A cam that doesn't care about emissions or gas mileage will put this thing way up.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by KLee
Can you imagine an intercooled maggy atop that beast with headers and open exhaust!?! 
It would make less power than a cam and headers. the M112 runs way out of off at 480-500 rwhp. Sometimes even less than that. They have really bad heat soak problems.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: C6 Z06 with headers
Originally Posted by Evil Turbo SS
It would make less power than a cam and headers. the M112 runs way out of off at 480-500 rwhp. Sometimes even less than that. They have really bad heat soak problems.
