Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

C4C Top 10s

Old Aug 5, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #1  
AdioSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
C4C Top 10s

http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...VyLXRyYWRlcw--
The Top Ten Cash for Clunkers Trade-Ins:

1. 1998 Ford Explorer

2. 1997 Ford Explorer

3. 1996 Ford Explorer

4. 1999 Ford Explorer

5. Jeep Grand Cherokee

6. Jeep Cherokee

7. 1995 Ford Explorer

8. 1994 Ford Explorer

9. 1997 Ford Windstar

10. 1999 Dodge Caravan

The Top Ten Cash for Clunkers New Cars:

1. Ford Focus

2. Honda Civic

3. Toyota Corolla

4. Toyota Prius

5. Ford Escape

6. Toyota Camry

7. Dodge Caliber

8. Hyundai Elantra

9. Honda Fit

10. Chevy Cobalt
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #2  
FiefSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 873
From: Chicago Burbs
I am suprised more Hyundai's aren't being bought. Every single news article I've read is of someone trading in their big american car for a hyundai.
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 08:26 AM
  #3  
Mr.GearheadZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 101
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Originally Posted by FiefSS
I am suprised more Hyundai's aren't being bought. Every single news article I've read is of someone trading in their big american car for a hyundai.
Because supporting Korea right now is a big .
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #4  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Is there a break down of what is being traded in my just models and not individual years?
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #5  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Geez, GM has ONE car in the top 10? Does anyone else think that list might illustrate where consumer confidence lies in the auto landscape?
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 09:44 AM
  #6  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Looks like Ford really sold some explorers back in the day...
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #7  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
i wonder why theyre considering each year of explorer as its own model and not the cherokee?
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by Plague
Looks like Ford really sold some explorers back in the day...
4-500k a year during the early years, that is crazy volume for a single vehicle
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #9  
Route66Wanderer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
From: U.S.A.
I suspect the make of the vehicles being purchased is a reflection of how well those companies have positioned themselves as high MPG/"Green" companies in the minds of consumers.
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #10  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by Mr.GearheadZ28
Because supporting Korea right now is a big .
I really hope this was a joke.
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #11  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
I'm surprised more SUVs aren't being purchased as they qualify as "category 1 trucks" and you only need to see a 5-mpg improvement to get the full $4500 rebate. For instance, my mom's Jeep Grand Cherokee is rated at 14-mpg average. If she buys a car it needs to average 24-mpg or better. If she buys an SUV, she needs only to see 19-mpg or better. So she could trade it in on a new Chevy Traverse FWD.
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #12  
neil350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,670
From: T E X A S
Originally Posted by Mr.GearheadZ28
Because supporting Korea right now is a big .
North Korea maybe, last I checked, no North Korean cars or products were for sale in the states. South Korea is a U.S ally and friend.
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
Tokuzumi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 602
From: Alpharetta, GA
What would be ironic is if one of the top 10 cars purchased was a ford explorer....
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #14  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Tokuzumi
What would be ironic is if one of the top 10 cars purchased was a ford explorer....
Maybe if it was next year. 2011 Explorer might qualify depending on what Ecoboost engine it gets.
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #15  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I'm surprised more SUVs aren't being purchased as they qualify as "category 1 trucks" and you only need to see a 5-mpg improvement to get the full $4500 rebate. For instance, my mom's Jeep Grand Cherokee is rated at 14-mpg average. If she buys a car it needs to average 24-mpg or better. If she buys an SUV, she needs only to see 19-mpg or better. So she could trade it in on a new Chevy Traverse FWD.
The people who are driving really old explorers probably can't afford something over 29k (MSRP).

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.