Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Blue Devil Pics

Old Feb 22, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #31  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally Posted by DvBoard
I doubt that. Jail, for what? It's not illegal unless you where trustpassing, or had signed a NDA etc.
I'd say there is some definite trust-passing going on, everywhere you look.

Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #32  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
It's just a powertrain mule....the actual car wil probably look quite a bit different.
I realize that it's just a powertrain mule, but still you'd think they'd want to be somewhat discrete. A red Z06 is going to attract attention no matter what.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #33  
Johnny I's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 353
From: Kingsville, TX
Seems to me that a company like GM, if they truely wanted to get this thing over there without any photos or extra attention, would have gone about it in a different manner. I'm thinking sending the cars sans engines and shipping them seperately or even through a more "private" shipping company.

Either way, I'm not buying the jail story just yet.

-John
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #34  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Johnny I
Either way, I'm not buying the jail story just yet.

-John
Me neither.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #35  
IMPALA64's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 543
From: GA
There may have been a signed contract between the shipper and GM about the car importance. This guy may have broken the contract.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #36  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by JasonD
I would think something along the lines of "theft of intellectual property".
I'd think it's more for tampering with the car (the hood doesn't just open on it's own does it?

There aren't really any ideas to be stolen, only ideas to be confirmed.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #37  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
I'm a fan of GM and the Z06, but putting a Vette enthusiast in jail is a big no-no.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #38  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Well GM and other automakers take this stuff very seriously. He might not got to jail but they have to be hard on him to prevent others from doing the same thing. Think of that Vette like a musician thinks of their songs and how they react when people download unauthorized music on the net for free.

Corporate security against the theft of potential designs or pictures is a very punishable offense. That's GM registered property and when trasferred to another location documents are signed to make sure any sensitive material or designs are protected from the media.

That was lesson number one when I worked at GM. My time at a certain secure and secret department in the company saw some people escorted out and maybe fired on the spot for just lifting up the tarp over a covered vehicle or model. They did well to perpetuate those rumors for all of us to hear.
Obey the rules and the job is just like everyone else's but break the rules bad enough and you'd be out within minutes and they would be asking where to mail your stuff.

Last edited by 99SilverSS; Feb 22, 2007 at 11:45 PM.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 03:36 AM
  #39  
camz28aro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 119
From: long island
i cant wait to see the finished product which is rumored to be 3000 lbs. i bet nurburgring times of low low seven minute laps will be appearing anyday now. hope they can keep the price under 100k. i wonder if GM has worked out the problem of getting all that power to the ground effectively, if so immagine what this will run if the Z06 did a 10.85 with DOT slicks and no other mods. i also think that GM would of had a contract or something with the shipping company and that the guy that took the pics is in for trouble
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #40  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Fired? Yes. Jailed?
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #41  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Fired? Yes. Jailed?

Theft = Theft
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #42  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Theft = Theft
Just what did he steal? Unless he signed a non-disclosure agreement with his employer, then they could terminate him. However the police are not going to arrest someone for corporate espionage. There is no indication that a crime was committed. Therefore in all likelyhood, GM would need to sue him and his employer, and win in court, before he'd ever see the inside of a jail.

Unless someone can indicate that an actual real crime was committed, I say BS.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #43  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 162
From: St. Louis, MO
So what, they threw a fit when the camaro spy shots got out.
In the end it just created a huge buzz and helped excitement.

Only the internet savvy will see these pics, anyway.
Now you have free internet publicity all over the www.
It's horrible I tell you.

That person probably did more for GM's corvette 'SS' marketing with a few pics then then everyone in GM's real marketing department combined.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 12:45 PM
  #44  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
See I told you the jail story was BS!

http://jalopnik.com/cars/spy-photos/...-c7-239173.php
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 06:18 PM
  #45  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Update: This story was on Channel 7 news at 7 PM here in Detroit.

-The 24 year old photo taker cannot be charged with a crime because he did not profit from the pictures (obviously the jail story was not true).
-The shipping company will not say if the employee was terminated.
-Police say he simply took the pictures because it "looked cool and wanted to share it with everyone".
-GM is investigating (though I'm not sure what more they can do.)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.