Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2009 Taurus SHO!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #31  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
This is why I hate Photoshop.
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #32  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Not too bad, if you get rid of the F-150 photochopped grille on it.
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #33  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Caps94ZODG
SS tell me how my appreciation for a fan made website on a car that back in the day was well recieved... is giving ford fasle hopes?

I like what you say on here man but to give me greif for my liking of a fan made photoshop car and website? I'd really like to know where your comming from on this one?
I thought that was the real deal.

Sorry if I offended but I only post up things that are legit, not some fan's interpretation of what Ford should release. I agree, there is a gulf between what Ford believe is in the best interests of customer taste and what one artist perceives as being an ideal Ford Taurus.

It would be good if there were less photoshops doing the circuit IMHO.
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 05:04 AM
  #34  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by jg95z28
This is why I hate Photoshop.
THANK YOU!!!!
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 06:37 AM
  #35  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by AdioSS
The funny thing is that engine was developed from the old SHO 3.4L V8.
I'm 99% sure that was a V6, not a V8.

The car looks pretty to me.
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 08:51 AM
  #36  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
The 1989 to 1995 SHO used a 3.0 Yamaha V6. The 1996-99 used a V8.
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #37  
alex94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 88
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
The 1989 to 1995 SHO used a 3.0 Yamaha V6. The 1996-99 used a V8.
Yeah, but wasn't it like a 3.4 liter V8 with 200 hp?
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #38  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by alex94z
Yeah, but wasn't it like a 3.4 liter V8 with 200 hp?
235 horses, and prone to cam failures, but I was mainly responding to JakeRobb saying that it was a v6 rather than a V8. I think most SHO fans WISH there had only been the first and second generation V6 cars. Or that the 3.0 and MT had continued into the third generation.
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #39  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by alex94z
Yeah, but wasn't it like a 3.4 liter V8 with 200 hp?
The following information comes from Wikipedia:
----------
1989: first SHO. 3.0L Yamaha V6 - 220hp, 200tq - 5sp manual only
1992: new body style, same engine/trans
1993: adds a 3.2L version of the engine with same hp, 215tq, available only with an automatic. 3.0L continues for 5sp versions
1996: new body style, 3.4L DOHC V8 - 235hp, 5sp auto only
2000: SHO gone.
----------

I think it's a typo that the V8 had a 5-speed auto. I beleive it was a 4-speed.

I had been under the impression that the 1996-99 V8 was a 4.0L. Apparently I was wrong.
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #40  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
I remember back in late '96/early '97 the V8 Taurus SHO and the Supercharged Grand Prix GTP came out at about the same time and in all the comparision tests the Grand Prix GTP handed the SHO its a**.
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #41  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
This does not excite me at all.

I think yamaha made my cd burner...Other than the Mustang, can Ford make a decent NEW performance sedan?
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 06:41 AM
  #42  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by 97QuasarBlue3.8
Other than the Mustang, can Ford make a decent NEW performance sedan?
Mustang != sedan.

The answer would seem to be that Ford Australia is the only group that can pull it off (Falcon, Mondeo). Why those cars haven't been brought here... I'm not sure. Maybe the designs aren't easily converted from right-hand drive to left.
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #43  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Mustang != sedan.

The answer would seem to be that Ford Australia is the only group that can pull it off (Falcon, Mondeo). Why those cars haven't been brought here... I'm not sure. Maybe the designs aren't easily converted from right-hand drive to left.
Yah, I guess that was worded a little funny. Ford just needs a performance car other than the Mustang. Perhaps a sports sedan of some sort. And I'd agree...Let's bring Ford of Europe/Australia stuff over here.
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #44  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
The Ford GT was pretty sweet... but I don't think exotics really accomplish what you're asking for.
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #45  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Mustang != sedan.
Well there was that rumor a while back about Ford building a 4-door RWD sedan based off the Mustang, so you never know.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.