2008 superduty
The whole concept of separating the HD's from the half-ton trucks visually seems unnecessary to me. GM did it just to fit the taller tranny and engine under the bodywork, but the GMT900 HD's look to be following the Ford model. I like how Dodge does their 2500 and 3500 Rams where you have to look at the number of lugs or the size of the rear axle to tell (apart from the big "2500" on th door).
The whole concept of separating the HD's from the half-ton trucks visually seems unnecessary to me. GM did it just to fit the taller tranny and engine under the bodywork, but the GMT900 HD's look to be following the Ford model. I like how Dodge does their 2500 and 3500 Rams where you have to look at the number of lugs or the size of the rear axle to tell (apart from the big "2500" on th door).
Seriously.
It looks like an International school bus cab to me. 
The old ones were sharp to me, they looked serious...this just looks cartoonishly stupid.
I'm surprised at this whole bigger is much better mentality with Ford and Toyota with fuel prices the way they are....I thought the OEM's stood to learn a lesson recently?
Pushing that brick down the highway has to be an enormous task.
It looks like an International school bus cab to me. 
The old ones were sharp to me, they looked serious...this just looks cartoonishly stupid.
I'm surprised at this whole bigger is much better mentality with Ford and Toyota with fuel prices the way they are....I thought the OEM's stood to learn a lesson recently?
Pushing that brick down the highway has to be an enormous task.Sure, there's a macho aspect to the size of these new trucks, but it definitely ain't all for fashion - the laws of physics are a real bitch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darth Xed
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
51
Apr 12, 2005 05:37 PM



