2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by falchulk
Anyone see the car and driver comparo between the mustnag and the gto? Its amazing how a "retro car" can make a "new design" look outdated. The side by side pictures really pointed out for me how unattractive the GTO is or the first time. I really did not mind the exterior styling until I saw those pics.
Here is a new car, which has a history, and a nostalgic history which appeals to car enthusiasts, and the year they come out with it, it has the same basic design as its sister cars. If they had come out with a new (GTO) style, and then let the Grand Am/Prix copy the style a year or two later, I wouldn't have ANY problem with it, but they did the opposite. They gave it a style that was already in existence! for years!
How would you feel if Chevy came out with a Camaro in the future that looks like a current/past coupe Impala/Monte Carlo? That's an actual fear I have anytime I read people here get all excited and hopeful about a 5th gen.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Besides needing the recessed grill they should have changed the tailights(less Civic-ish) and perhaps make the car a bit larger(Bonneville size),never did like how the new GTO is Cavalier-ish in its' size/look.Here are more pics and info on the '05...http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2005-Pontiac-GTO.htm
Last edited by 91Zman; Dec 30, 2004 at 12:33 PM.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by Darth Xed

Now it's not just a "Grand Prix" but it's a "riced up" Grand Prix?
What makes it "riced up"?
Because it's wearing hood scoops, just like his "riced up" Formula in the sig.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by steve2002
How would you feel if Chevy came out with a Camaro in the future that looks like a current/past coupe Impala/Monte Carlo? That's an actual fear I have anytime I read people here get all excited and hopeful about a 5th gen.
Rest your anxiety and your fears.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by 91Zman
Besides needing the recessed grill they should have changed the tailights(less Civic-ish) and perhaps make the car a bit larger(Bonneville size),never did like how the new GTO is Cavalier-ish in its' size/look.Here are more pics and info on the '05...http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2005-Pontiac-GTO.htm
Civic-ish taillights? Cavalier-ish size? Oh my gosh, it's got ford model t-ish steering wheel! It's round!
Take a look at the GTO next time you see one in person. Its size is anything but econo-size Cavalier.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by 91Zman
The 2 cars are kinda close in size with the GTO being only minutely bigger.AS for the tail lights,they do look like they belong on a civic.
2005 Cavalier: 180.9" length, 68.7" width.
2005 GTO: 189.8" length, 72.5" width.
GTO is a 9 inches longer, and 4 inches wider.
Even I will say that is a significant difference.
As for the taillights belonging on a Civic... I guess that's a subjective styling thing if you feel that way...
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by muckz
Because it's wearing hood scoops, just like his "riced up" Formula in the sig.
The GTO's are just for show. They don't actually do anything.
I don't know about you, but fake hood scoops that don't actually do anything is pretty ricey. Obviously you see nothing wrong with it.

Ps. Your the first person who's ever called my Firebird rice. Your definition of what is rice is clearly different from mine. If you think my car is rice, you've got issues
J/K Last edited by '93 formy ...; Dec 30, 2004 at 03:36 PM.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by '93 formy ...
My "RAM AIR" is functional
The GTO's are just for show. They don't actually do anything.
I don't know about you, but fake hood scoops that don't actually do anything is pretty ricey. Obviously you see nothing wrong with it.
Ps. Your the first person who's ever called my Firebird rice. Your definition of what is rice is clearly different from mine. If you think my car is rice, you've got issues
J/K 
The GTO's are just for show. They don't actually do anything.
I don't know about you, but fake hood scoops that don't actually do anything is pretty ricey. Obviously you see nothing wrong with it.

Ps. Your the first person who's ever called my Firebird rice. Your definition of what is rice is clearly different from mine. If you think my car is rice, you've got issues
J/K Your formula came from the factory with fake reverse scoops.
93 to 97 Z28's had fake scoops.
All 3rd Gen Z28's and IROC's had fake louvered hoods and/or scoops.
1963 Corvettes had fake grates on the hood...
Are these cars, and many many more all "rice" too, since they fit your definition?
And, according to Pontiac, the scoops ARE functional. They just don't produce a Ram Air effect... but they do bring cooler air into the engine compartment.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Some links:
Picture of underside of new hood:
http://www.ls1gto.com/05GTO/Pictures...ntitled-11.jpg
Story to go with it...
http://www.ls1gto.com/05GTO/
Picture of underside of new hood:
http://www.ls1gto.com/05GTO/Pictures...ntitled-11.jpg
Story to go with it...
http://www.ls1gto.com/05GTO/
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
Your formula came from the factory with fake reverse scoops.
93 to 97 Z28's had fake scoops.
All 3rd Gen Z28's and IROC's had fake louvered hoods and/or scoops.
1963 Corvettes had fake grates on the hood...
Are these cars, and many many more all "rice" too, since they fit your definition?
93 to 97 Z28's had fake scoops.
All 3rd Gen Z28's and IROC's had fake louvered hoods and/or scoops.
1963 Corvettes had fake grates on the hood...
Are these cars, and many many more all "rice" too, since they fit your definition?

Ps. that's not a GTO THIS is a GTO

EDIT: They're not 4 doors. My mistake.
Last edited by '93 formy ...; Dec 30, 2004 at 03:52 PM.
Re: 2005 GTO pics (rear and hood)
Originally Posted by '93 formy ...
Atleast none of them were Australian 4 doors family sedans with pansy Euro lights 

So, basically... you are stone cold wrong, busted, and have nothing to say that is useful?


