05 Mustang pics, not the concept!!!
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...BluePrint3.jpg
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...BluePrint1.jpg
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...BluePrint2.jpg
I like it!!!
Since GM killed the Camaro I guess it's time to go to another brand that offers V8 RWD performance without the Aussie styling (GTO).
I've been a sole buyer of GM cars and trucks for 11 years, and that streak is over!
Kiss my *** GM, I'm going elsewhere.
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...BluePrint1.jpg
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...BluePrint2.jpg
I like it!!!
Since GM killed the Camaro I guess it's time to go to another brand that offers V8 RWD performance without the Aussie styling (GTO).

I've been a sole buyer of GM cars and trucks for 11 years, and that streak is over!
Kiss my *** GM, I'm going elsewhere.
That's because all the Mustang pics on that site are on the same page.
The 05 Concept unveiled is more exagerated than what the actual 05 Mustang will look like.
05 Concept
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...97/12-28-5.jpg
Ford released a concept before 94 that looked nothing like the production car.
The 05 Concept unveiled is more exagerated than what the actual 05 Mustang will look like.
05 Concept
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...97/12-28-5.jpg
Ford released a concept before 94 that looked nothing like the production car.
I like that concept(for lack of better word, I'm calling it concept) shell, looks like an 03 Cobra got laid by a late 60's fastback
I hope Chevy gets the good sense to make the Monte Carlo RWD/V8 once again, and restyle the nose to be a bit more attractive. That would rule
I hope Chevy gets the good sense to make the Monte Carlo RWD/V8 once again, and restyle the nose to be a bit more attractive. That would rule
Originally posted by HuJass
Those pics look like the ones the designers use while working on their computers. I wonder who got them and how.
Those pics look like the ones the designers use while working on their computers. I wonder who got them and how.
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...Motorweek1.jpg
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...Motorweek3.jpg
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...Motorweek4.jpg
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/conc...Motorweek2.jpg

Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
You sure those aren't 35 year old pics?
You sure those aren't 35 year old pics?
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/con.../BluePrint1.jpg
...that I haven't seen 35 years ago. At least pictures that I haven't seen before, I'm only 24.
alittle late guys...
They showed that car at the show. I think it looks bada$$!!! I'll take mine in silver or black please.
http://autoshow.msn.com/autoshow2003...rdEveningEvent
http://autoshow.msn.com/autoshow2003...rdEveningEvent
Did any1 else see the new M*****g concept in "action" on the SPEED channel before??
It is way too "back in the day," the entire car. Especially the ridiculous interior and sequential lighted taillights. I don't think it looks "muscular" enough for a musclecar.
It is way too "back in the day," the entire car. Especially the ridiculous interior and sequential lighted taillights. I don't think it looks "muscular" enough for a musclecar.
Did any1 else see the new M*****g concept in "action" on the SPEED channel before??
It is way too "back in the day," the entire car. Especially the ridiculous interior and sequential lighted taillights. I don't think it looks "muscular" enough for a musclecar. That all glass roof in that link is stupid.
It is way too "back in the day," the entire car. Especially the ridiculous interior and sequential lighted taillights. I don't think it looks "muscular" enough for a musclecar. That all glass roof in that link is stupid.


