Autocross and Road Racing Technique There is more to life than a straight line
View Poll Results: Which frame/supension mod made more of a difference?
STB made more of a difference
1
6.67%
SFC made more of a difference
14
93.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: STB or SFC which made more of a difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:17 AM
  #1  
mobleman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 455
From: Syracuse, NY
Poll: STB or SFC which made more of a difference?

Just wondering which mod stiffened up or enhanced performance of their car more.
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #2  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
Subframes first, STB second, although I had my STB on before the subs. The center of the car is held together by the roof (for those like you who have one) and the floor boards/trans tunnel, so it needs all the help it can get, when it has to restrain the front and rear weight of the car. The STB just helps avoid chassis flex between the shock towers, it helps but not like subframes.
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #3  
Lady in Nomex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 103
From: Davis, CA, USA
Subframes! Here's my experience with my '97 TA: I got the Kenny Browns... I could tell the difference pulling out of the driveway of the shop that welded them on! Driving across railroad tracks at speed before SFCs was a struggle to get the car stable after the crossing. After SFCs the car just goes over them without all the drama!
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #4  
warner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 96
From: Portland, OR USA
Ditto on the Subframes. Noticed immediately upon driving off the lot and going out the driveway. Car is much more stable in turns as it's not bending so much. The STB helps significantly and is worth doing. Car feels way better with these two mods.
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 01:46 AM
  #5  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
Definately, feels like a whole new car.
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #6  
Z Power's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 180
From: Ellicott City, Md
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Definately, feels like a whole new car.
ditto

Just get both, then you're be happy
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 06:40 PM
  #7  
mobleman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 455
From: Syracuse, NY
cool I like it when everone agrees! Makes the choice that much easier. Sub Frames it is!! (First that is)
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 11:08 PM
  #8  
blown383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 1,384
From: Los Angeles, CA
Id have to say subframes also....going over speed bumps and stuff...the car was twisting all over the place.....I wonder if there is anything else other than SFCs, STBs, etc.....

-B
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:12 AM
  #9  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
There sure is, cage is next
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #10  
Black94mula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 407
From: Lemont IL, usa
Where did you guys take your cars to have the SFC installed?
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #11  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
I went to Midas, after that I decided I should get my own MIG.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 08:44 PM
  #12  
Steve in Seattle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,445
From: Seattle, WA
friend of mine helped me out. We welded on the KBDD SFC's in ~9 hours... of course this includes everything, including putting stuff back in the car when done. START EARLY. I didn't finish until 3am... when you're sore and covered in dirt/greese/metal-shavings and you've been around welding fumes for the past 4 hours that 3am is awefully painful.

That said, we didn't really rush it at all and took some breaks for burgers, a small welding tutorial, and at the time we didn't have a lift to start with, so I had to spend nearly an hour getting the car on 4 jack stands and level. Since you want the suspension under static compression, you'll want to support the lower A-arms up front, and the axle tubes in the rear. Of course if you have any ramps, those would be preferable (I used ramps out back and put jack stands under the front a-arms).

A 4-post lift would have been MUCH easier/faster.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 09:26 PM
  #13  
blown383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 1,384
From: Los Angeles, CA
Geez...I went to a muffler shop nearby and they charged me $50 and it took all of 30 minutes to install.

-B

Last edited by blown383; Apr 29, 2003 at 12:28 AM.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #14  
mobleman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 455
From: Syracuse, NY
Steve,

I'm assuming you went all out and removed the interior carpeting and backing to avoid a fire? 9 hours seems like a lot of time for a subframe install, but then again I've yet to do one.
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #15  
auto-Xer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 117
From: Sterling, VA
Try to keep the car weighted when you weld them in as well. If you just jack the car up the body will flex differently than when its resting on all 4 wheels. So an alignment rack would be ideal...

--Kevin
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Victor Lamb
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
Aug 26, 2017 02:52 PM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
Joes96z
Appearance
3
Dec 13, 2014 07:48 PM
jim88iroc305
Car Audio and Electronics
1
Aug 13, 2002 09:24 PM
Krab
Car Audio and Electronics
1
Aug 5, 2002 12:08 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.