Autocross and Road Racing Technique There is more to life than a straight line

Best handling stock ride height set up?

Old Sep 28, 2002 | 07:05 PM
  #16  
Sam Strano's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 715
From: Brookville, PA
Best handling stock height setup?
I very much like my stock springs, with Koni fronts, Bilstein rears and a 35mm front sway bar.

At least it was good enough to win the SCCA ProSolo champioship in F Stock this year (and the car finished 2nd @ solo2 Nat's too, I loaned it to a friend).
Old Sep 29, 2002 | 06:29 AM
  #17  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Nice to know stock springs aren't a huge impediment to handling. That's impressive 01 FS Z28!

Anyone care to comment on Koni vs. HAL (remembering that I am interested in the best compromise between high performance street and drag strip use)?

Rich Krause
Old Sep 29, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #18  
lons94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 304
From: SW Michigan
Like I said earlier the only big disadvantage to stock ride height is lack of neg camber. If not trying to stay withing a set of rules this is no big deal. Just pick up a set of new upper arms.
Hals the best shock for a 4th gen? I VERY highly doubt it. Not only are they a very low pressure gas shock but will react to shaft movements much slower providing sloppy control characteristics. They look Jazzy and I am sure they do perform great under drag race situations. But the best. To me the best shock is what controls the spring movements the best-Koni or Bilsteins.
Plus the Hals are not what I consider an adjustable shock. An adjustable shock has the ability to change valving characteristics. The Hals dont. Both rebound AND compression are adjusted at the same time. If I wanted a drag shock that was OK for street use I might go with Hal.
I think you are putting too much into the shocks effects on drage race launches. If you think I am crazy and that it does make a difference test them yourself. IN THEORY Koni and Bilstein will hurt drag weight transfer because they will not let the front wheels un-weight themselves as much or as quickly. But they will control spring movements much better, provide a better than stock ride and provide Desireable handling characteristics.
With that said I went with revalved Bilsteins on my car. Handles great and rides pretty darn good despite telling Sam I didnt care about ride quality. Would it launch well? Nope. But it has a big heavy front sway bar stiffer than stock springs and is lowered 2" Killing anti-squat char.

Point to all this. The advantages gained by properly valved Bilsteins or Konis FAR OUTWEIGH the disadvantages.
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 07:57 AM
  #19  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by lons94z
Like I said earlier the only big disadvantage to stock ride height is lack of neg camber. If not trying to stay withing a set of rules this is no big deal. Just pick up a set of new upper arms.
Hals the best shock for a 4th gen? I VERY highly doubt it. Not only are they a very low pressure gas shock but will react to shaft movements much slower providing sloppy control characteristics. They look Jazzy and I am sure they do perform great under drag race situations. But the best. To me the best shock is what controls the spring movements the best-Koni or Bilsteins.
Plus the Hals are not what I consider an adjustable shock. An adjustable shock has the ability to change valving characteristics. The Hals dont. Both rebound AND compression are adjusted at the same time. If I wanted a drag shock that was OK for street use I might go with Hal.
I think you are putting too much into the shocks effects on drage race launches. If you think I am crazy and that it does make a difference test them yourself. IN THEORY Koni and Bilstein will hurt drag weight transfer because they will not let the front wheels un-weight themselves as much or as quickly. But they will control spring movements much better, provide a better than stock ride and provide Desireable handling characteristics.
With that said I went with revalved Bilsteins on my car. Handles great and rides pretty darn good despite telling Sam I didnt care about ride quality. Would it launch well? Nope. But it has a big heavy front sway bar stiffer than stock springs and is lowered 2" Killing anti-squat char.

Point to all this. The advantages gained by properly valved Bilsteins or Konis FAR OUTWEIGH the disadvantages.
Which of these (Koni or Bilstein) are double adjustable?

Rich Krause
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 08:12 AM
  #20  
Jason Short's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,051
From: Rochester, NY USA
Rich, I am going to sell my rear Hal's if you would be interested in them. Mabye we can work something out on them and the ET's you have. The only reason I am changing them out is because I am going to get more involved in road course and will be going to a different setup. My Hal's only have ~5500 miles on them.

Jason
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 03:56 PM
  #21  
lons94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 304
From: SW Michigan
Chances are you and alot of people are not going to arrive at the best set-up with double adjustables. I think you need to have a very good understanding of what changes in rebound and compression will do to the balance of the car.
Most commonly used adjustable shock for F bods that is performance handling oriented is the Koni single adjustable.
Bilstein shocks are not ajustable but isnt really a concern as they must be valved to the spring.
Double adjustable is the Koni DA.
I am a fan of the Bilstein shock but for your application you may want Koni shocks for the adjustable rebound. The rebound should be the only thing that will affect your launch. Give Sam (01 FS Z/28) a call and he will set you up.
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 03:17 PM
  #22  
96speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,248
From: Houston, TX
Thumbs up Rich: FYI

Rich: I will be upgrading my brakes weekend after next. After thinking carefully about what I wanted to do, I have decided to install the stock springs back on with the Hal shocks (removing the HAL Drag springs) since I will be removing the spindles regardless. I will let you know my opinion as soon as I get some seat time. Thought you might like to know...


Ryan

btw...thanks for the idea
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 01:32 PM
  #23  
pastrdcp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 31
From: Oakland,CA.,USA
Cool

I installed 1LE suspension and found the rear ride heigth increased by 3/4 to 1 inch
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 10:43 PM
  #24  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
At this point I have puchased the 1LE front and rear sway bars and the 1LE springs. The only question is the shocks. The Koni double adjustable sound like the best bet. But at ~$1,300 I am not so sure.

Any further opinions? Remeber, I want to come as close to the "best of both worlds" as I can with a stock ride height. Assuming the DA Koni's are "best", what's "second best"?

Rich Krause
Old Oct 17, 2002 | 01:27 PM
  #25  
Sam Strano's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 715
From: Brookville, PA
Originally posted by rskrause
At this point I have puchased the 1LE front and rear sway bars and the 1LE springs. The only question is the shocks. The Koni double adjustable sound like the best bet. But at ~$1,300 I am not so sure.

Any further opinions? Remeber, I want to come as close to the "best of both worlds" as I can with a stock ride height. Assuming the DA Koni's are "best", what's "second best"?

First off, Double adj. Koni's are less than $1300 a set. But you shouldn't assume that they are the "best" just because they are the most expensive. They are great shocks, but in 99% of the cases DA's are complete and utter overkill and SA's are all that are required (and plenty of shock too). They are just over $700 a set. Big difference, especially when you consider that the rebound range is the same as a DA, the bump is the same as the DA's soft setting (and bump in those is meant for a race-track, it's not meant to do much on the street, and it only makes it ride harder for no reason).

Shocks are a lot more complicated than they appear. What you would want to run depends GREATLY on what is done to the car and what you do with the car. For handling use, either Koni's or revalved Bilstein's are the what you want to stick with. Nothing else readily available compares.
Old Oct 17, 2002 | 05:19 PM
  #26  
pastrdcp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 31
From: Oakland,CA.,USA
Cool

I installed the sinlge Koni's per "Sam Strano". I have not been able to adjust the fronts, maybe they were installed wrong. I assume the fronts were set on soft like the rears. The overall ride is harsh but very stable on the road and
Thunderhill Raceway track.
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 09:19 PM
  #27  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
The cheapest I have seen the DA Koni's is Tire Rack, which has them for $337 for the fronts and $280 for the rears. Total is $1,234 so they aren't quite $1,300, I'll admit. In any case, I will pay that if it's "worth it". But I really don't understand much about shocks. Do you (01 FS Z28) mean that when you adjust the SA shocks that all you are changing in rebound?

Help! I'm confused.

Rich Krause
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 09:03 PM
  #28  
Sam Strano's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 715
From: Brookville, PA
Originally posted by rskrause
The cheapest I have seen the DA Koni's is Tire Rack, which has them for $337 for the fronts and $280 for the rears. Total is $1,234 so they aren't quite $1,300, I'll admit. In any case, I will pay that if it's "worth it". But I really don't understand much about shocks. Do you (01 FS Z28) mean that when you adjust the SA shocks that all you are changing in rebound?

I sell them for the same price FWIW.

It's not worth it, *especially* if you really don't understand much about shocks. Sure some instances warranty DA's, but they are rare, and they will require a race track and high speeds. BTW, DA's aren't warrantied like SA's are. Race parts and all.....

Yes, SA's are rebound only adjustable (about 3 times the rebound vs. bump in shocks). The rebound is the critical aspect of the dampers.
Old Oct 21, 2002 | 08:09 AM
  #29  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by 01 FS Z28
I sell them for the same price FWIW.

It's not worth it, *especially* if you really don't understand much about shocks. Sure some instances warranty DA's, but they are rare, and they will require a race track and high speeds. BTW, DA's aren't warrantied like SA's are. Race parts and all.....

Yes, SA's are rebound only adjustable (about 3 times the rebound vs. bump in shocks). The rebound is the critical aspect of the dampers.
Sam: do you sell the SA? I would like to support a board member and am leaning in that direction. What do you think of the proposed setup (1LE springs and sway bars, Koni SA shocks) keeping mind that my goal is have a good handling stock ride height suspension?

Rich Krause
Old Oct 21, 2002 | 12:52 PM
  #30  
steve_c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 75
From: San Jose, California
If you're going to go with Koni's, use the DA for the front, and the SA for the rear.

The front DA bump is actually useful for the car since it simulates more spring in the front. If you're willing to go 1LE soft...
The DA is bad for the back.. it is valved too stiff, well the bump at least.

Overall rebound is the important element, bump is more an adjustment for the track.. depending on the surface.

Steve

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.