Solenoid Actuated Valves
Solenoid Actuated Valves
Elimination of Camshafts. Controlled by Computer Engine Mapping. Someone told me about in the lounge. Anyone hear of it and care to take an "Advanced" look at this? Really interesting I'd love to hear the details and/or read an article on it.
-Corey
-Corey
To my knowledge it hasn't been used in a race yet, but some F1 teams have admitted to testing non-camshaft actuated valves. F1 engines currently use cams to open valves and pneumatic (probably high pressure nitrogen) springs to close them. That allows 19,000 rpm. With cylinders smaller than the current 300 cc, they might rev past 20K, but pneumatic springs should be up to that easily. It looks like they might reduce F1 from 3.0L to about 2.4L. Most folks would go from 10 to 8 cylinders and keep the same bore/stroke and rpms.
Probably the obvious attraction for solenoid (or other non cam-actuated valves) is infinitely variable valve timing, and fewer limits on valve velocity (lift per degree of crank rotation). Of course there is still mass to accelerate, so 'square wave" valve motion still isn't practical, or for that matter desirable, but that's another story.
As for NASCAR, Nextel Cup engines are limited to flat lifters and pushrods. Not even roller cams. Yeah, and 9300+ all day with metal valve springs.
Don't hold your breath for solenoid retrofit kits for SBCs.
.
Probably the obvious attraction for solenoid (or other non cam-actuated valves) is infinitely variable valve timing, and fewer limits on valve velocity (lift per degree of crank rotation). Of course there is still mass to accelerate, so 'square wave" valve motion still isn't practical, or for that matter desirable, but that's another story.
As for NASCAR, Nextel Cup engines are limited to flat lifters and pushrods. Not even roller cams. Yeah, and 9300+ all day with metal valve springs.
Don't hold your breath for solenoid retrofit kits for SBCs.
.
Last edited by OldSStroker; Jan 7, 2004 at 07:56 AM.
About 20 years ago someone was doing research on rotary valve heads.
In principle it's very simple;
You have tubes filled with air/fuel that have slots cut in them. As they rotate the openings are exposed to the combustion chamber and the air/fuel mix flows into the chamber, then the continued rotation of the tube closes off the chamber and ignition takes place.
No shrouding, no delay.
I wonder what ever happened to that idea...?
In principle it's very simple;
You have tubes filled with air/fuel that have slots cut in them. As they rotate the openings are exposed to the combustion chamber and the air/fuel mix flows into the chamber, then the continued rotation of the tube closes off the chamber and ignition takes place.
No shrouding, no delay.
I wonder what ever happened to that idea...?
Originally posted by LameRandomName
About 20 years ago someone was doing research on rotary valve heads.
In principle it's very simple;
You have tubes filled with air/fuel that have slots cut in them. As they rotate the openings are exposed to the combustion chamber and the air/fuel mix flows into the chamber, then the continued rotation of the tube closes off the chamber and ignition takes place.
No shrouding, no delay.
I wonder what ever happened to that idea...?
About 20 years ago someone was doing research on rotary valve heads.
In principle it's very simple;
You have tubes filled with air/fuel that have slots cut in them. As they rotate the openings are exposed to the combustion chamber and the air/fuel mix flows into the chamber, then the continued rotation of the tube closes off the chamber and ignition takes place.
No shrouding, no delay.
I wonder what ever happened to that idea...?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350350
Fuel and Ignition
14
Aug 11, 2015 12:03 PM
RX Speed Works
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 24, 2015 02:25 PM



