Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

RR's or shaft mounts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 01:26 AM
  #1  
LT1 POWR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,830
From: Colorado Springs, CO
RR's or shaft mounts.

I'm currently building a procharged 383 and I have converted dart sbc heads with (i believe) 3/8 studs and 1.65 Crower RR's. I don't plan on spinning the motor past 6500 rpm, but I have read where people are picking up 30 hp and a quieter valve train from switching to shaft mounts. I know the base cost is a little over $800, but would it be beneficial for me to run shaft mounts?
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #2  
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 6,247
From: Charlotte,MI USA
Do a search in this section. There is a long informative thread in here on the subject.
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 06:59 AM
  #3  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
For a Hydraulic setup, I have yet to find a compelling reason to run shafties.
The real gains come from high-revving motors, specifically those with sollid rollers where you are adjusting on a regular basis.

Use 7/16" studs, a quality set of rockers (I like Comp Promags) and you'll be just fine
No rev kits, stud girdles or other junk should be required.

Originally Posted by LT1 POWR
but I have read where people are picking up 30 hp and a quieter valve train from switching to shaft mounts.
I've heard those rumors as well, and no one has been able to prove it.
In most cases, the gains are a result of not having set up the valvetrain properly to begin with
or having used 3/8" studs, junk rockers and/or springs. See the link below
Note that there is a gain of <2rwhp by switching to shafties, and only above 6100rpm.

http://www.circletrack.com/techartic...t_results.html

Last edited by user 647483; Nov 2, 2008 at 07:05 AM.
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #4  
mzgp5x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
From: MI
I too have a 97ss 383 D1 M6 FI app. I was using 3/8 studs and Crane gold SA RR's on afr 190 heads. I switched to hardened PR's, guide plates, and Comp ProMag RR's with 7/16 studs. Comp Pro's have a larger trunion bearing. The valve system is much more stable with 7/16 studs. I also run an AFR rev kit, which, I like. It works very well for agressive cam lobes. One thing I noticed during assembly... The stock hyd_lifter retainers can come very close to releasing the lifter flat on high lift cams. The rev kit loads the lifters onto the cam, so, the chance of float is greatly diminished. I run about .560" lift, and, the flat is very close to disengagement on the lifter retainer. B.
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #5  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Shaft rockers are as JM suggested - to be considered for wild solid grinds. If it is going to have a hydraulic cam, don't give shaft mounts another thought.

Rich
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
NJLT1SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 661
From: Montville, NJ, U.S.A.
I run Jesel SS shafts with my HR cam. I was previously running Comp NSA aluminum rockers, 3/8 stud with AFR guide plates. Yes, my valve train did get MUCH quieter with the shafts. As for HP gains, I have heard around 20 to 25HP increase, although I do not have any before and after dyno tests after I made the swap. There is someone that posted in the LT1 Tech section that did show a 20 HP gain switching to shafts, but I don’t recall his setup, HR or solid. I agree with James Montigny, use a 7/16 stud and a good NSA rocker with guide plates, don’t worry about running a rev kit or girdle. I would get away from the 3/8 setup. As for the benefits of going with shafts, yes, there are some. I think they are a benefit for hydraulic or solid roller setups. There is some more reading you can do here on Jesel's website: http://www.jeselonline.com/v2/index.php?categoryid=52



Nick
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
Ericksd
Drivetrain
4
Jan 20, 2016 06:07 PM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Sep 27, 2015 01:07 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
CamaroSS30thAnn
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
Sep 8, 2015 04:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.