renault F1 video
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by rskrause
Well, people do have a big advantage over machines - they heal. But OTOH a 5-axis CNC machine never sued anybody 
Rich

Rich
Big difference...HUGE difference.
Imagine Boyd Coddington (American Hot Rod) or even Paul, Sr. as your lead trauma doc. The mind reels!
Re: renault F1 video
fuel for thought
the thing wraps like an electric drill...reminds me more of a pit stop than the engine
http://www.angeltowns2.net//smele/video/f1.wmv
edit: this may be the same video from earlier in the thread, the other link is down so i'm not for sure
and with the budget they have i have a question about the headers. with all that money couldn't they just use a metal with a really low melting point, fill the tube of .015 thick metal with it and cap the ends, take it into a giant freezer, let it cool into maliable metal, and then bend the headers?
the thing wraps like an electric drill...reminds me more of a pit stop than the engine

http://www.angeltowns2.net//smele/video/f1.wmv
edit: this may be the same video from earlier in the thread, the other link is down so i'm not for sure
and with the budget they have i have a question about the headers. with all that money couldn't they just use a metal with a really low melting point, fill the tube of .015 thick metal with it and cap the ends, take it into a giant freezer, let it cool into maliable metal, and then bend the headers?
Last edited by number77; Mar 30, 2005 at 03:17 PM.
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by number77
fuel for thought
the thing wraps like an electric drill...reminds me more of a pit stop than the engine
http://www.angeltowns2.net//smele/video/f1.wmv
edit: this may be the same video from earlier in the thread, the other link is down so i'm not for sure
and with the budget they have i have a question about the headers. with all that money couldn't they just use a metal with a really low melting point, fill the tube of .015 thick metal with it and cap the ends, take it into a giant freezer, let it cool into maliable metal, and then bend the headers?
the thing wraps like an electric drill...reminds me more of a pit stop than the engine

http://www.angeltowns2.net//smele/video/f1.wmv
edit: this may be the same video from earlier in the thread, the other link is down so i'm not for sure
and with the budget they have i have a question about the headers. with all that money couldn't they just use a metal with a really low melting point, fill the tube of .015 thick metal with it and cap the ends, take it into a giant freezer, let it cool into maliable metal, and then bend the headers?
If the metal has that low of a melting point after they bend them into headers and use them wouldnt they just melt of the car??
-john
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by Camaro_Guru16NY
If the metal has that low of a melting point after they bend them into headers and use them wouldnt they just melt of the car??
-john
-john
i'm just pulling this out of no where, but to this 19 yr old it sounds more efficient, no welds, can be bent to any shape with the inside special metal supporting the header metal, and faster
thought?
Last edited by number77; Mar 31, 2005 at 12:23 AM.
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by number77
i mean have the outside metal whatever you want the headers to be made out of, fill it with a special metal with a low melting point. then put it in a giant freezer (big enough to work in). the liquid metal inside of the .015 tubing would turn into maliable metal. in the freezer you could bend it. then take it out of the freezer and allow that special metal (with a low melting point, hopefully a little above room temperature) to melt out of the thin walled bent tubing.
i'm just pulling this out of no where, but to this 19 yr old it sounds more efficient, no welds, can be bent to any shape with the inside special metal supporting the header metal, and faster
thought?
i'm just pulling this out of no where, but to this 19 yr old it sounds more efficient, no welds, can be bent to any shape with the inside special metal supporting the header metal, and faster
thought?Inconel is usually the metal of choice for F1 (and Nextel Cup) headers because of it's ability to work at the high temps ecountered in thinner sections than other stainless steels, or plain steels.
FWIW, F1 headers are a little thicker than .015. The are probably around 0.5 mm to maybe .75 mm (.020-.030). When they were allowed qualifying engines they did use .015 thick tubing, but it could only last a few laps. Obviously the reason for the thinnest tubing is weight reduction. Same thing for Cup cars. Lighter headers allow putting the weight where it does the most good for handling.
There are a number of ways to fabricate the bends required, but that's another story. Low cost isn't one of the parameters.
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Pretty much....
They make those headers out of Inconel and it's really thin and holds up to lots-o-heat.
Bret
They make those headers out of Inconel and it's really thin and holds up to lots-o-heat.
Bret
Same material you can get for the Enzo exhaust ...... We have an Enzo here with a SS Fuchs system on it. Sounds...
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
Sorry, but things just don't work that way.
Inconel is usually the metal of choice for F1 (and Nextel Cup) headers because of it's ability to work at the high temps ecountered in thinner sections than other stainless steels, or plain steels.
FWIW, F1 headers are a little thicker than .015. The are probably around 0.5 mm to maybe .75 mm (.020-.030). When they were allowed qualifying engines they did use .015 thick tubing, but it could only last a few laps. Obviously the reason for the thinnest tubing is weight reduction. Same thing for Cup cars. Lighter headers allow putting the weight where it does the most good for handling.
There are a number of ways to fabricate the bends required, but that's another story. Low cost isn't one of the parameters.
Inconel is usually the metal of choice for F1 (and Nextel Cup) headers because of it's ability to work at the high temps ecountered in thinner sections than other stainless steels, or plain steels.
FWIW, F1 headers are a little thicker than .015. The are probably around 0.5 mm to maybe .75 mm (.020-.030). When they were allowed qualifying engines they did use .015 thick tubing, but it could only last a few laps. Obviously the reason for the thinnest tubing is weight reduction. Same thing for Cup cars. Lighter headers allow putting the weight where it does the most good for handling.
There are a number of ways to fabricate the bends required, but that's another story. Low cost isn't one of the parameters.
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by number77
Darn. I just figured the inside metal could support the tubing while it was being bent. 

Some folks have packed dry sand inside a tube, sealed the ends and used the sand to support the tube while it is bent. A backyard approach that can work.
With a VERY high-end mandrel bender you can bend even very thin, tough tubing succcesfully. There are other ways to get tight, smooth bends other than using tubing. How about hydroforming?
Last time I checked, Inconel headers for a Cup car were over $6000 per set. That might be low. For that price they usually come polished.
Re: renault F1 video
How about this thing
http://www.radicalextremesportscars..../indexspec.php
Good noises.... http://www.radicalextremesportscars....runs/00004.MP3
Here is a pic of it... http://www.radicalextremesportscars....s/Dscn0021.jpg
Yep that's what you get with 2 HayaBusa motors strapped together.... Now if someone wanted to make a 4.0L V8 out of two S2000 motors that were tuned up, 500hp easy.
Bret
http://www.radicalextremesportscars..../indexspec.php
Good noises.... http://www.radicalextremesportscars....runs/00004.MP3
Here is a pic of it... http://www.radicalextremesportscars....s/Dscn0021.jpg
Yep that's what you get with 2 HayaBusa motors strapped together.... Now if someone wanted to make a 4.0L V8 out of two S2000 motors that were tuned up, 500hp easy.
Bret
Re: renault F1 video
Originally Posted by rskrause
I wonder if they will spin the new 2.4L V-8's any faster?
Rich
Rich
With the shorter engine length they will be able to increase the bore and shorten the stroke some more and keep the 300 cc per cylinder. With larger bore and more valve area possible, they should be able to keep the same torque/L @ hp peak, which I estimate at 90-93 lb-ft/L. If they can push the peak hp rpm from about 17800-18000 where it appears to be now, even with 19-20K max rpm, to 21000, they should be pushing 900 hp! It might take them a year or so, but who knows...some of them might be there now.



20002