Milling Trick Flow Heads n other stuff
Re: 300cfm & 195cc heads.
Originally Posted by Elysian
I would personally like to see some legitimate 300cfm standard port style SBC 23 degree heads that aren't bigger than 210cc's. I had the $hit hogged out of my AFR 195's (205cc final port volume) and they flow 280cfm at .6 lift. Unless Trickflow had radically altered the port geometry, I think 280-290cfm is more reasonable. I don't doubt that it CAN be done, I've just never personally seen it.
Originally Posted by Denny McLain
Also on the coating issue....... Again, until someone can come up with objective dyno or et information saying it's worthwhile..... Thanks, but no thanks. I was hoping someone by now had actually did some dyno testing adn could prove the gains. This in itself may speak volumes.
after he had piston tops coated, from that moment on, this SBC engine made a solid 4 average HP more..not a lot of gain, but if you've tried everything else and have a lot of extra money, it might be worth it ?
Bret
Last edited by SStrokerAce; Oct 18, 2004 at 11:46 AM.
Re: 300cfm & 195cc heads.
I'd love to get a set of this new TFS heads. I currently have a set of AFR190cc.
However, I'm hesitant to go ahead and pull the trigger on this move, until I see some prove of somebody actually achieving the flow numbers already talked about on this thread.
I've heard of TFS having fixed the initial flaw on the thickness of the ports. I want somebody to "show me" actual porting that reflect 300cfm. I just can't go on potential only. I'll be happy if somebody can get 285-290 @ .550 or so out of them...
-Goose
However, I'm hesitant to go ahead and pull the trigger on this move, until I see some prove of somebody actually achieving the flow numbers already talked about on this thread.
I've heard of TFS having fixed the initial flaw on the thickness of the ports. I want somebody to "show me" actual porting that reflect 300cfm. I just can't go on potential only. I'll be happy if somebody can get 285-290 @ .550 or so out of them...
-Goose
Re: Milling Trick Flow Heads n other stuff
Put some 227's on it and forget it.It will make more HP and torque with them.(more head-less cam)
Don't waste your money on coatings unless you have a trailer queen and looking for the last 100th,its not worth the cost on a street/strip engine.
Spend your money on the top end ie.heads,cam,intake and TB-CAI
Don't waste your money on coatings unless you have a trailer queen and looking for the last 100th,its not worth the cost on a street/strip engine.
Spend your money on the top end ie.heads,cam,intake and TB-CAI
Last edited by 1racerdude; Oct 18, 2004 at 01:23 PM.
Re: Milling Trick Flow Heads n other stuff
The 290-295 cfm and 240+ @ .400 using the Trick Flow 2.02 valves came from a pretty good source whom I trust. This person has no reason to say anything otherwise as he just ports them and doesn’t sell heads. I’m also sure Brent is on the money as he may be using a different porter.
I’ve had two different sets of stage III LT4 heads with 2.02 valves and 206 and 208 cc intakes independently bench flowed and both flowed 283-284 cfm max and 235 cfm @ .400. Both heads had an average flow of 185 cfm to .600. Again, this was the best LT4's two different shops had to offer.
The 10 extra cfm or so over the LT4’s is worth something for sure (about 20 hp I believe). However, considering the smaller 2.02 valves in the Trick Flow heads, does the extra 10-15 cfm from the larger AFR 2.08 valves make any more power????
Sure someone like Larry or Brent knows the math behind this can decipher the real impact. All I know is Performance Trends software likes smaller valves with less flow vs larger valves and a bit more flow.
You know all about inquiring minds.
I’ve had two different sets of stage III LT4 heads with 2.02 valves and 206 and 208 cc intakes independently bench flowed and both flowed 283-284 cfm max and 235 cfm @ .400. Both heads had an average flow of 185 cfm to .600. Again, this was the best LT4's two different shops had to offer.
The 10 extra cfm or so over the LT4’s is worth something for sure (about 20 hp I believe). However, considering the smaller 2.02 valves in the Trick Flow heads, does the extra 10-15 cfm from the larger AFR 2.08 valves make any more power????
Sure someone like Larry or Brent knows the math behind this can decipher the real impact. All I know is Performance Trends software likes smaller valves with less flow vs larger valves and a bit more flow.
You know all about inquiring minds.
Re: Milling Trick Flow Heads n other stuff
Originally Posted by Denny McLain
The 290-295 cfm and 240+ @ .400 using the Trick Flow 2.02 valves came from a pretty good source whom I trust. This person has no reason to say anything otherwise as he just ports them and doesn’t sell heads. I’m also sure Brent is on the money as he may be using a different porter.
PM me if you don't want to answer that question here.
One more thing, what ever happened to Craig Gallant from GTP?
I still think he's one of the best porters in the Country, is he not?
Goose
Re: Milling Trick Flow Heads n other stuff
I consider Craig to be a friend and in fact bought a cam from him this spring. For all I know he still has his business (GTP) in Houston. I’m personally very sorry to hear a few on this list have had problems with his heads as he really is a nice person. Nice wife, nice shop, etc, etc. Kinda a combination of dumbfounded and disappointed when I heard the reports.
One of the sets of LT4 heads I flowed came from Craig. He told me they flowed 283 and on Kim Barr’s flow bench, that’s exactly what they flowed. The other set of LT4 heads came from a pretty highly regarded vendor on this list (whom I won’t mention) that were suppose to flow just below 300 cfm. On Lloyd Elliots bench, they flowed 284 max.
One of the sets of LT4 heads I flowed came from Craig. He told me they flowed 283 and on Kim Barr’s flow bench, that’s exactly what they flowed. The other set of LT4 heads came from a pretty highly regarded vendor on this list (whom I won’t mention) that were suppose to flow just below 300 cfm. On Lloyd Elliots bench, they flowed 284 max.
Re: Milling Trick Flow Heads n other stuff
You know IF i was going to have a set ported like that I might look to a guy posting in this thread who already has a set of TFS heads flowing the numbers posted 
Regardles of what Max is preaching I still continue to use coatings. N2O seems to like Coatings more then detonation
BUT that is just me and I am not an expert just a stupid parts buyer

Regardles of what Max is preaching I still continue to use coatings. N2O seems to like Coatings more then detonation

BUT that is just me and I am not an expert just a stupid parts buyer
Re: 300cfm & 195cc heads.
WRT coatings: for us street and street/strip enthusiasts I think the same as Bret. They are of the most use on forced induction (or nitrous) motor on the piston crowns. They will keep the piston temps down under boost and therefore provide some protection. Probably worth a few hp as well, I don't doubt. But I wouldn't way they are worth ~$200 for the hp gain unless you have done everything else first. If max hp is to be gained from coating at least the crowns and the exhaust valve face should be coated, and probably the combustion chamber face and intake valve while you are at it as well. How much gain? I am sure the tests have been done, though I have never seen them.
Rich
Rich
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



