Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Manley valve question

Old Feb 25, 2005 | 01:26 AM
  #1  
12Second3rdgen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Manley valve question

Looking for a fast answer on this one, trying to order valves tomorrow .

I am getting ready to order valves for my Dart 220 race heads. They take a .200 long 2.08/1.6 valve to get the installed height I am looking for.

Basically here is the question:
I am looking at Manley race series valves- the Race master and the Race flow valves are both about the same cost. The race flow valves are undercut and the Race masters are not, I am assuming for strength?

My valvesprings are Isky 9965's which spec at:
1.56OD, 245lbs on the seat @ 1.950, 585lbs open @ 1.270 and will be setup at 1.950 installed height.

Basically, am I running too much spring pressure for an undercut valve like the Race Flows, or does it really matter?

Thanks guys!
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #2  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Re: Manley valve question

Originally Posted by 12Second3rdgen
The race flow valves are undercut and the Race masters are not, I am assuming for strength?
This is obviously, in 'hindsight', but...no, for flow.

Basically, am I running too much spring pressure for an undercut valve like the Race Flows...?
No, but could have contacted Manley, to confirm.
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #3  
12Second3rdgen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Re: Manley valve question

Obviously an undercut valve is beneficial to flow. I was curious as to the strength difference between the two.

I called Manley and talked to a technician who said the undercut valves are mainly for people who are running in classes who arent allowed to do any porting, and that since I am going to have portwork done on my heads I should just stick with the Racemaster valves.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 07:44 AM
  #4  
89385formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,114
From: New York
Re: Manley valve question

Originally Posted by 12Second3rdgen
Obviously an undercut valve is beneficial to flow. I was curious as to the strength difference between the two.

I called Manley and talked to a technician who said the undercut valves are mainly for people who are running in classes who arent allowed to do any porting, and that since I am going to have portwork done on my heads I should just stick with the Racemaster valves.
A wise man told me a couple days ago that the Race-Flo valves are like 9 grams lighter than the Racemasters. That is a considerable difference in valvetrain weight if you ask me....I would get the race-flo's.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 08:04 AM
  #5  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Re: Manley valve question

Originally Posted by 12Second3rdgen
Looking for a fast answer on this one, trying to order valves tomorrow .

I am getting ready to order valves for my Dart 220 race heads. They take a .200 long 2.08/1.6 valve to get the installed height I am looking for.

Basically here is the question:
I am looking at Manley race series valves- the Race master and the Race flow valves are both about the same cost. The race flow valves are undercut and the Race masters are not, I am assuming for strength?

My valvesprings are Isky 9965's which spec at:
1.56OD, 245lbs on the seat @ 1.950, 585lbs open @ 1.270 and will be setup at 1.950 installed height.

Basically, am I running too much spring pressure for an undercut valve like the Race Flows, or does it really matter?

Thanks guys!

Thoughts before purchasing springs:

You've quoted .680 lift and a lot of spring. How fast are you planning to turn this engine? How aggressive is the cam? Does you valvetrain designer know about the u/c valves, and were the heads ported/flowed for u/c valves?

If the answers don't add up, you might be a little premature in ordering springs.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
12Second3rdgen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Re: Manley valve question

Originally Posted by OldSStroker
Thoughts before purchasing springs:

You've quoted .680 lift and a lot of spring. How fast are you planning to turn this engine? How aggressive is the cam? Does you valvetrain designer know about the u/c valves, and were the heads ported/flowed for u/c valves?

If the answers don't add up, you might be a little premature in ordering springs.

I have already purchased the springs. I found a deal I couldn't pass up ($50.00 with titanium retainers), they are the Isky tool room springs.

The guy doing my headwork knows they will be non u/c valves, they have not been ported yet. They will be ported for the racemasters and flowed. As long as I am happy with the results they will go on the car, or else they will go back under the grinder and then be reflowed. I would like to see 310/210 @ .700.

I plan on shifting the car at 7000 rpm, maybe less if it doesn't effect ET a great deal. The camshaft is as follows:

262/266@.050, .667/.625 w/ 1.5's (which is what I will be running), 106LSA.

If I find the motor wants to peak above 7000 rpm, I plan on advancing the cam timing a few degrees.

This is my fast street car. Extremely limited street use, driven to the track (7-10 minute rural highway drive) and downtown occassionally on weekends.

Any constructive input you would like to give would be appreciated .
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #7  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: Manley valve question

Originally Posted by 89385formula
A wise man told me a couple days ago that the Race-Flo valves are like 9 grams lighter than the Racemasters. That is a considerable difference in valvetrain weight if you ask me....I would get the race-flo's.

LOL I was just going to write that..... Thanks.

I would take 9g out of a valve any day I could.

Bret
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #8  
12Second3rdgen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Re: Manley valve question

Well I already ordered the valves after I talked to the Manley tech on Friday, so its a done deal. Any other suggestions are welcome.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 01:24 AM
  #9  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Manley valve question

I have had the undercut stems break on both the intake and exhaust.
Won't run them anymore.Makes a mess @7000 RPM's.
A little Flow and Weight don't make up for a new block and pistons and heads.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 02:20 AM
  #10  
12Second3rdgen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Re: Manley valve question

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
I have had the undercut stems break on both the intake and exhaust.
Won't run them anymore.Makes a mess @7000 RPM's.
A little Flow and Weight don't make up for a new block and pistons and heads.
That is exactly what I am scared of. That is why I didn't skimp on valves either, spent the $200.00 on a decent set . What kind of spring pressure were you running?
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 03:07 AM
  #11  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: Manley valve question

Now is 260# on the seat and 660# on the nose. Nasty mech roller in my shop car. Have run different pressures in customers cars from 125# on the seat to 280# on the seat. Also saw the undercut stems hurt air flow in some heads.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM
91 Redd Sledd
Midwest
5
Jul 28, 2002 12:59 AM
GA93FORMULA
Drag Racing Technique
0
Jul 24, 2002 11:38 PM
Speeds8erM-1
Drag Racing Technique
6
Jul 18, 2002 11:36 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.