Which LSA/ICL

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 24, 2009 | 02:03 PM

#16

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 165

From: Lengede

Quote:

Originally Posted by Injuneer

I'll e-mail you a scan if I get a chance at the office today.

Fred

Thank you very much!!!!!!!
Really interesting and nice reading. Too bad valve bounce occurred past 6600 rpm which didn't do the 113 LSA any good.

My cam has 110°/110° and I don't know what 110° ICL does compared of being 4° advanced as usual. Would you know???

Thanks again
Arnold

Mar 25, 2009 | 02:02 PM

#17

marshall93z

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 2,639

From: Mooresville, NC

That was not a very good article for comparing cams.

Mar 25, 2009 | 02:10 PM

#18

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 165

From: Lengede

Quote:

Originally Posted by marshall93z

That was not a very good article for comparing cams.

Why not??
Is it because of the big cam or because they didn't use a 355 ci like yours??

Mar 25, 2009 | 10:06 PM

#19

marshall93z

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 2,639

From: Mooresville, NC

Because all that test showed was... that compression, those heads, that fuel, those headers, and so on... liked a 107 LSA. Which, coincidentally, Comp just released a line of 107 cams!