Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Light Weight Crankshafts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2008, 07:33 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Light Weight Crankshafts

Anyone have any thoughts about using a light weight crankshaft on the street? I'm thinking of the Scat Q-Lite at 40 pounds or the Superlite at 44 pounds.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 06-23-2008, 07:54 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
compstar comet
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 06-24-2008, 11:13 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Thanks Dwayne I will look into them.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 06-24-2008, 11:29 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
firstlast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NASHVILLE TN.
Posts: 157
im running eagles lightweight crank and i love it. it revs so much quicker, this is in my daily driver
firstlast is offline  
Old 06-24-2008, 06:02 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Thanks for the reply. I did think there would be any problem running a lightweight crank on the street as long as it was balanced properly. That is good to hear.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:01 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
slomarao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
I read a post about them freeing up lots of hp??? True?
Something about a light weight rotating assembly will produce more power??
slomarao is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:43 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
I don't think it produces more power but does allow the motor to rev up faster. Less rotating mass for the toque to overcome.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 10:34 PM
  #8  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,647
You end up with more HP at the flywheel, because less HP is consumed in acceleratiing the mass of the rotating assembly. How much HP you gain on a dyno will depend on the engine rev rate, in RPM/sec.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 11:11 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Meen95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 486
I am actually looking at a 3.750 crank from Ohio Crankshaft, weighs 44 lbs. and about $550 I believe.. Thats less weight for a little under the price of the 52 lb eagle or scat.. I still have the Eagle H-Beams that weigh 630g, so dunno if it will do me any good? Any opinions?
Meen95z is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 12:18 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Engineerland
Posts: 1,517
Originally Posted by Meen95z
I am actually looking at a 3.750 crank from Ohio Crankshaft, weighs 44 lbs. and about $550 I believe.. Thats less weight for a little under the price of the 52 lb eagle or scat.. I still have the Eagle H-Beams that weigh 630g, so dunno if it will do me any good? Any opinions?

Run far and fast. Those ohio cranks are all over the friggen place on tolorences last time I saw somebody try to use one it woulda cost 3x what he paid to actually get it in shape for use.

You wont notice a lighter crank unless you're road racing and matching revs is really important. In that case a light crank and flywheel is where its at you can get the engine where you need it a bit faster than the heavy crank.

The only other thing is, the energy your crank soaks up instead of sending it to the drive wheels is put back into the car at a different time. The inertia is given back to the car when you shift and the engine speed slows down... thats the surge of speed or the little bump you get during a shift at wot or anytime really.

If the price difference of the light stuff is insignificant then by all means go for it. If its going to cost more my opinion on that is, every dollar you put into the heads is worth three dollars anywhere else.

I would not lose sleep over my crank being 10lbs heavier than it coulda been. Also keep your eye on the target bobwieghts of the cranks you're thinkig of buying.
WS6T3RROR is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 01:07 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Meen95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 486
ahh I got ya, well if I can get a Eagle 4340 Crank for $200 plus shipping with 1800 miles on it, would it be wise and cost effective to buy it?
Meen95z is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 01:12 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Engineerland
Posts: 1,517
Assuming theres nothing wrong with it, by all means. I would at the least have it polished and checked for cracks and runout though, figure that into your bill.
WS6T3RROR is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 06:52 AM
  #13  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Stay away from Ohio Crankshaft.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 07:18 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
tomcowle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GENEVA, Ohio
Posts: 463
Rich, I hate to disagree with you but they are great to work with. I've had them "correct" several cranks supplied by thier competitors (Eagle especially, scat, and etc) and for very reasonable costs.

I've bought cranks from them and if they had any run-out or straightness issues they gladly corrected the problems, no questions asked.
tomcowle is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 07:44 AM
  #15  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Originally Posted by tomcowle
Rich, I hate to disagree with you but they are great to work with. I've had them "correct" several cranks supplied by thier competitors (Eagle especially, scat, and etc) and for very reasonable costs.

I've bought cranks from them and if they had any run-out or straightness issues they gladly corrected the problems, no questions asked.
Their service may be good, but there are plenty of horror stories about their import cranks.

Rich
rskrause is offline  


Quick Reply: Light Weight Crankshafts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.