extremely low MAF readings compared to RWHP... need some ideas
#1
extremely low MAF readings compared to RWHP... need some ideas
Here is a brief list of my mods...
Ported LT4 heads (302 / 224 @ 600 lift)
CC306
FLPs
52mm TB
home made 4" PVC CAI (with 2 90* bends and a 4" to 3" reducer on the maf)
Descreened MAF (not ported)
the car made 371 RWHP on the dyno and 342 RWTQ (pretty low for the amount of head and cam i got) though the fuel pump was running out of juice at 4500 .. (but thats besides the point)
the car also ran 12.1 @ 116 mph (M6, slicks, 3500 lbs)
but heres what makes me wonder ... the MAX maf reading i ever seen out of this car is 272 AFGS
my question is .. WHY SO LOW ?! i cant figure out why my maf reading is so low ...
a friend of mine locally has a set of nice LT1 heads with the GTP5 cam .. (236/236) and his maf maxes out at 371 AFGS .. another friend with smaller heads and CC305 maxes out at 320 AFGS and made 350 rwhp ... (both thru 48mm TBs and descreened mafs)
is it my MAF thats bad ? is it my porky CAI thats causing turbulance ? is it my heads ? is it my cam ?
am i REALLY flowing 272 AFGS at 6500 rpm and still making 371 rwhp ?!
heres some pictures of my sewer pipe CAI and my dyno chart .. open to any ideas / suggestions
thanx
Picture of my home made CAI
(ps. very old picture, still had stock heads / mac headers back then)
Dyno sheet
Ported LT4 heads (302 / 224 @ 600 lift)
CC306
FLPs
52mm TB
home made 4" PVC CAI (with 2 90* bends and a 4" to 3" reducer on the maf)
Descreened MAF (not ported)
the car made 371 RWHP on the dyno and 342 RWTQ (pretty low for the amount of head and cam i got) though the fuel pump was running out of juice at 4500 .. (but thats besides the point)
the car also ran 12.1 @ 116 mph (M6, slicks, 3500 lbs)
but heres what makes me wonder ... the MAX maf reading i ever seen out of this car is 272 AFGS
my question is .. WHY SO LOW ?! i cant figure out why my maf reading is so low ...
a friend of mine locally has a set of nice LT1 heads with the GTP5 cam .. (236/236) and his maf maxes out at 371 AFGS .. another friend with smaller heads and CC305 maxes out at 320 AFGS and made 350 rwhp ... (both thru 48mm TBs and descreened mafs)
is it my MAF thats bad ? is it my porky CAI thats causing turbulance ? is it my heads ? is it my cam ?
am i REALLY flowing 272 AFGS at 6500 rpm and still making 371 rwhp ?!
heres some pictures of my sewer pipe CAI and my dyno chart .. open to any ideas / suggestions
thanx
Picture of my home made CAI
(ps. very old picture, still had stock heads / mac headers back then)
Dyno sheet
#3
Re: extremely low MAF readings compared to RWHP... need some ideas
Originally posted by sideways_Into_3rd
Here is a brief list of my mods...
Ported LT4 heads (302 / 224 @ 600 lift)
CC306
FLPs
52mm TB
home made 4" PVC CAI (with 2 90* bends and a 4" to 3" reducer on the maf)
Descreened MAF (not ported)
the car made 371 RWHP on the dyno and 342 RWTQ (pretty low for the amount of head and cam i got) though the fuel pump was running out of juice at 4500 .. (but thats besides the point)
the car also ran 12.1 @ 116 mph (M6, slicks, 3500 lbs)
but heres what makes me wonder ... the MAX maf reading i ever seen out of this car is 272 AFGS
a friend of mine locally has a set of nice LT1 heads with the GTP5 cam .. (236/236) and his maf maxes out at 371 AFGS .. another friend with smaller heads and CC305 maxes out at 320 AFGS and made 350 rwhp ... (both thru 48mm TBs and descreened mafs)
is it my MAF thats bad ? is it my porky CAI thats causing turbulance ? is it my heads ? is it my cam ?
am i REALLY flowing 272 AFGS at 6500 rpm and still making 371 rwhp ?!
Here is a brief list of my mods...
Ported LT4 heads (302 / 224 @ 600 lift)
CC306
FLPs
52mm TB
home made 4" PVC CAI (with 2 90* bends and a 4" to 3" reducer on the maf)
Descreened MAF (not ported)
the car made 371 RWHP on the dyno and 342 RWTQ (pretty low for the amount of head and cam i got) though the fuel pump was running out of juice at 4500 .. (but thats besides the point)
the car also ran 12.1 @ 116 mph (M6, slicks, 3500 lbs)
but heres what makes me wonder ... the MAX maf reading i ever seen out of this car is 272 AFGS
a friend of mine locally has a set of nice LT1 heads with the GTP5 cam .. (236/236) and his maf maxes out at 371 AFGS .. another friend with smaller heads and CC305 maxes out at 320 AFGS and made 350 rwhp ... (both thru 48mm TBs and descreened mafs)
is it my MAF thats bad ? is it my porky CAI thats causing turbulance ? is it my heads ? is it my cam ?
am i REALLY flowing 272 AFGS at 6500 rpm and still making 371 rwhp ?!
I'm always a little skeptical of LT4 heads that flow more than 300cfm, and I know what my heads flow and I know mine flow a lot less, and I make significantly more HP - yes its a 381, but the heads have to flow. I've also seen comparitive head flows for a huge variety of LT1/LT4 heads, all done on the same bench by the same operator, by a shop that has built the quickest 4th Gen LT1 on the planet, and there aren't many heads in their catalog that flow more than 300cfm.... George Baxter's (1,125fwHP) come to mind.
Next, the issue of "GPS". A stocker, at 275HP uses maybe 250gps. If you look at 437 flyHP, 0.46 BSFC, and 13:1 A/F you see maybe 330gps at peak HP. You would get a similar air flow if you approached it another way and looked at 350ci with a 90% VE at 6,500rpm. So your 272gps at 6500rpm doesn't make any sense at all. Your friends' numbers seem more rational.
The design of your intake isn't causing the problems.... a poor intake would cause excessive pressure drop, air density would drop, mass air flow would drop, and HP would drop. If you were really flowing 272gps, you would only be making maybe 350HP. But you're making the HP, so it isn't the cold air setup that's causing the oddball MAF reading.
Have you had the PCM programming altered in any way.... specifically, have you altered the MAF frequency vs. GPS table at all?
Have you ever had the A/F ratio checked with a wideband? If the MAF meter is reading that low, the PCM would be adding a ridiculously low fuel rate, and it would be running lean. Unless, of course the miscalibration of the MAF sensor is relatively constant across the flow range, and the PCM is building up some healthy BLM numbers in the 150-160 range.
What are you BLM's?
Have you altered the PE tables to change the target A/F ratio at WOT?
Have you checked for a massive air leak after the MAF sensor?
Have you ever tried someone elses MAF sensor, that you know produces the readings you are expecting... 300+GPS?
Last edited by Injuneer; 01-20-2003 at 02:50 PM.
#4
Sounds low
IIRC, my stock engine with 4" CAI and 3" cutout pulled around 270-something GPS around 5400 RPM... so I'd say your sensor is malfunctioning, or as Fred inquired, your PCM may have been altered in the MAFS frequency tables, etc.
#5
Re: Re: extremely low MAF readings compared to RWHP... need some ideas
Originally posted by Injuneer
I'm always a little skeptical of LT4 heads that flow more than 300cfm, and I know what my heads flow and I know mine flow a lot less, and I make significantly more HP - yes its a 381, but the heads have to flow. I've also seen comparitive head flows for a huge variety of LT1/LT4 heads, all done on the same bench by the same operator, by a shop that has built the quickest 4th Gen LT1 on the planet, and there aren't many heads in their catalog that flow more than 300cfm.... George Baxter's (1,125fwHP) come to mind.
I'm always a little skeptical of LT4 heads that flow more than 300cfm, and I know what my heads flow and I know mine flow a lot less, and I make significantly more HP - yes its a 381, but the heads have to flow. I've also seen comparitive head flows for a huge variety of LT1/LT4 heads, all done on the same bench by the same operator, by a shop that has built the quickest 4th Gen LT1 on the planet, and there aren't many heads in their catalog that flow more than 300cfm.... George Baxter's (1,125fwHP) come to mind.
The design of your intake isn't causing the problems.... a poor intake would cause excessive pressure drop, air density would drop, mass air flow would drop, and HP would drop. If you were really flowing 272gps, you would only be making maybe 350HP. But you're making the HP, so it isn't the cold air setup that's causing the oddball MAF reading.
and i still dont understand how i can make even 371 rwhp with that low MAF readings
Have you had the PCM programming altered in any way.... specifically, have you altered the MAF frequency vs. GPS table at all?
Have you ever had the A/F ratio checked with a wideband? If the MAF meter is reading that low, the PCM would be adding a ridiculously low fuel rate, and it would be running lean. Unless, of course the miscalibration of the MAF sensor is relatively constant across the flow range, and the PCM is building up some healthy BLM numbers in the 150-160 range.
What are you BLM's?
Have you altered the PE tables to change the target A/F ratio at WOT?
What are you BLM's?
Have you altered the PE tables to change the target A/F ratio at WOT?
Have you checked for a massive air leak after the MAF sensor?
Have you ever tried someone elses MAF sensor, that you know produces the readings you are expecting... 300+GPS?
Have you ever tried someone elses MAF sensor, that you know produces the readings you are expecting... 300+GPS?
so to sum it up
i'll check the maf tables
try another maf sensor
possibly try a proper CAI setup
and i was still reading that low from the maf !? toss the heads in the garbage ?
#6
Just for fun have you tryed to clean your m/a with carb spray? you would be surprised on how just little dirt ie k@n spray will make the car go lean?
and you said that with your 30lbs inj you hit 100 d/c with them i have stock in tank and just a inline with stock 24 lbs and i only hit 80% d/c but i had my f/p up to 60 psi? and i only made 350 rwhp ?
good luck!!!
and you said that with your 30lbs inj you hit 100 d/c with them i have stock in tank and just a inline with stock 24 lbs and i only hit 80% d/c but i had my f/p up to 60 psi? and i only made 350 rwhp ?
good luck!!!
#7
Fred hit it on the head - what are your BLM numbers like? If the MAF is reading wrong (meaning more air is coming in, but it reads too low), then the car will always be running lean and your BLMS will be 130+. The assumption is you haven't adjusted the MAF tables (why would you?) and you haven't compensated for this lean condition by lowering your injector sizing.
I would look for leaks in the intake track (especially the elbow UNDER the TB), check intake manifold bolts for tightness, check hoses running into manifold for cracks, and consider trying a different MAF.
-Alex
I would look for leaks in the intake track (especially the elbow UNDER the TB), check intake manifold bolts for tightness, check hoses running into manifold for cracks, and consider trying a different MAF.
-Alex
#8
JEEESUS!
SID I JUST figured out why your HP is so low!
You STOPPED the Dyno at 6,300? Why? My combo(Simular to your but smaller heads) does not PEAK till 6,800!
Take that thing back and spin it up to par!
To make you feel better at 6,300 I am only making 378RWHP. At 6,800 I peak at 394.99
I Would look there for your missing HP. tha combo needs to be shifted at 6,900...only because PCM will fuel cut at 7k.
The heads in question flowed over 300 when they left MTI the last time they were Checked again here in washington. I thought SID had them checked in Canada?
I agree there is some thing fishy with LT4 heads i always wonder about them myself. i have a set but have never ran them. We are getting ready to embark a on a strange journy to get them to flow like AFR 215RRs
Good luck SID!
SID I JUST figured out why your HP is so low!
You STOPPED the Dyno at 6,300? Why? My combo(Simular to your but smaller heads) does not PEAK till 6,800!
Take that thing back and spin it up to par!
To make you feel better at 6,300 I am only making 378RWHP. At 6,800 I peak at 394.99
I Would look there for your missing HP. tha combo needs to be shifted at 6,900...only because PCM will fuel cut at 7k.
The heads in question flowed over 300 when they left MTI the last time they were Checked again here in washington. I thought SID had them checked in Canada?
I agree there is some thing fishy with LT4 heads i always wonder about them myself. i have a set but have never ran them. We are getting ready to embark a on a strange journy to get them to flow like AFR 215RRs
Good luck SID!
#9
schurters LT1: by m/a .. do u mean MAF ?? no i've never cleaned my maf .. didnt know u could spray it with carb cleaner !!!
fred / AlexA .. my BLMs were ugly on the old 30#er .. they were way split !!! one side way lean one side half decent .. i recently upgraded to 36#ers (awaiting the walbro still) .. and only fired it up and idled the car .. and the BLMS were WAY WAY lean .. upwards of 130+ which was wierd .. now i dont know if its my brand new SVO 36s that are faulty or what ..
but next time i fire up the car i'll take a log..
unfortunately i have a ceased street twin so i cant really drive around and take a log of cruising
either way .. i'll try the MAF and double check my maf tables ..
thanx .. any other ideas welcome
Ellis, i wasnt spinning my car on the dyno .. the dyno guy was being very ignorant and told me that there is no point to spin hyd lifters past 6500 .. if u notice in my dyno sheet . my hp never leveled off or started to drop !!! so i figured if he'd spin it higher i could've hit some more hp
once i get my fuel pumpin properly i'll take it back and tell the guy to spin till he sees the light come on at 7k
considering my fuel pressure was at 15-20 past 6000 it probably wasnt a good idea to spin her much farther anyway !!!
next time i'll also try to remember to open my cutout ...
but i gotta solve the case of the missing AFGS before i hit the dyno again
thanx
ps. ellis wahts the specs on the 847 cam again ?
fred / AlexA .. my BLMs were ugly on the old 30#er .. they were way split !!! one side way lean one side half decent .. i recently upgraded to 36#ers (awaiting the walbro still) .. and only fired it up and idled the car .. and the BLMS were WAY WAY lean .. upwards of 130+ which was wierd .. now i dont know if its my brand new SVO 36s that are faulty or what ..
but next time i fire up the car i'll take a log..
unfortunately i have a ceased street twin so i cant really drive around and take a log of cruising
either way .. i'll try the MAF and double check my maf tables ..
thanx .. any other ideas welcome
Ellis, i wasnt spinning my car on the dyno .. the dyno guy was being very ignorant and told me that there is no point to spin hyd lifters past 6500 .. if u notice in my dyno sheet . my hp never leveled off or started to drop !!! so i figured if he'd spin it higher i could've hit some more hp
once i get my fuel pumpin properly i'll take it back and tell the guy to spin till he sees the light come on at 7k
considering my fuel pressure was at 15-20 past 6000 it probably wasnt a good idea to spin her much farther anyway !!!
next time i'll also try to remember to open my cutout ...
but i gotta solve the case of the missing AFGS before i hit the dyno again
thanx
ps. ellis wahts the specs on the 847 cam again ?
Last edited by sideways_Into_3rd; 01-20-2003 at 10:08 PM.
#10
"considering my fuel pressure was at 15-20 past 6000 it probably wasnt a good idea to spin her much farther anyway !!! "
This says it all With fuel you should easily out dyno me.
Hopefully you have not toasted the ring's. I would not worry about the AGF if every thing else is falling in line They will probably come up with Fuel.
Jim is telling me you should with a 350 peak at around 6,600.
The way I have mine installed with 1.6 int and 1.52 ext.
GM #847 234/242 .575/.565 112LSA on a billet core Cost is $204 from GM parts direct.
Good luck!
This says it all With fuel you should easily out dyno me.
Hopefully you have not toasted the ring's. I would not worry about the AGF if every thing else is falling in line They will probably come up with Fuel.
Jim is telling me you should with a 350 peak at around 6,600.
The way I have mine installed with 1.6 int and 1.52 ext.
GM #847 234/242 .575/.565 112LSA on a billet core Cost is $204 from GM parts direct.
Good luck!
Last edited by OneFlyn95z28; 01-20-2003 at 11:01 PM.
#11
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28
Good luck!
Good luck!
if u dont come up to race at mission this year im gonna have to make a trip down
ps. just checked my tune .. bone stock MAF table !!!
also found out that a friend of mine with a bone stock car has MAF readings higher than mine at 5800 rpm ...
Last edited by sideways_Into_3rd; 01-21-2003 at 01:01 AM.
#12
You've got to keep you "problems" seperate from each other, or you are going to get confused.
Problem #1 - MAF Readings
There is no doubt you are actually making the HP, so there is no doubt you are actually flowing more that 275gps. In that case, no matter what the cause of the bad reading, the PCM is having to correct with added fuel, and you should be seeing BLM's way up near the limit.
-try another MAF
-clean your MAF
-look for another air source (wild stab in the dark - do you have the EGR valve removed and a leak on the blocking plate?)
-one thing that might make the CAI an issue would be a configuration that dumps all the air to one side of the MAF, throwing off the calibration. I don't see anything in your setup, except maybe that 4"->3" reducer is forcing the air all into the center or something??? Try putting the screen back in to correct the air distribution on the inlet side of the MAF and see if that changes the readings. I doubt it, but who knows. In designing a hot-wire flow measurement device (= MAF sensor), you should always try and maximize the straight portion of duct leading up to the device, avoiding bends and reductions.
Problem #2 - Engine isn't making the HP it should
Obvious issues like inadequate fuel, not revving high enough, poor air intake system, etc.
But you have to treat these as two different problems. I would also go very carefully through the tables in the programming and insure you haven't accidentaly altered something, or not updated the tables and input correctly.... maybe have them checked by someone else.
Problem #1 - MAF Readings
There is no doubt you are actually making the HP, so there is no doubt you are actually flowing more that 275gps. In that case, no matter what the cause of the bad reading, the PCM is having to correct with added fuel, and you should be seeing BLM's way up near the limit.
-try another MAF
-clean your MAF
-look for another air source (wild stab in the dark - do you have the EGR valve removed and a leak on the blocking plate?)
-one thing that might make the CAI an issue would be a configuration that dumps all the air to one side of the MAF, throwing off the calibration. I don't see anything in your setup, except maybe that 4"->3" reducer is forcing the air all into the center or something??? Try putting the screen back in to correct the air distribution on the inlet side of the MAF and see if that changes the readings. I doubt it, but who knows. In designing a hot-wire flow measurement device (= MAF sensor), you should always try and maximize the straight portion of duct leading up to the device, avoiding bends and reductions.
Problem #2 - Engine isn't making the HP it should
Obvious issues like inadequate fuel, not revving high enough, poor air intake system, etc.
But you have to treat these as two different problems. I would also go very carefully through the tables in the programming and insure you haven't accidentaly altered something, or not updated the tables and input correctly.... maybe have them checked by someone else.
#13
Yes you can clean your maf with carb spray clean clean clean it at work we have done e testing and you would not beleve the diff cleaning the maf does we are talking pass and fail here so give it a try.
With an intake leaking i don't think so your iac counts would be down very very low to the ponit where your iac is closed?
take baby steps and fix all the things to get the car at par then hunt for problems
good luck
With an intake leaking i don't think so your iac counts would be down very very low to the ponit where your iac is closed?
take baby steps and fix all the things to get the car at par then hunt for problems
good luck
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
canbaufo
Cars For Sale
0
02-24-2015 10:27 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
01-23-2015 01:13 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-11-2015 06:10 PM