Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Dropping compression on 383 LT-1 w/LT-4 setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 07:43 PM
  #1  
Hawk312's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 225
From: York, Pa
Dropping compression on 383 LT-1 w/LT-4 setup

This engine is in a car I am considering buying. Currently the compression is at 12.4:1. I want to drop it down significantly to handle a supercharger, probably down to 10.5:1 atleast. The problem is that this engine was just rebuilt several thousand miles ago (with quality components) and I really want to avoid another complete rebuild. It has the LT-4 Hot kit installed which includes the LT-4 heads. I can get gaskets that will drop the compression another point, so I am told. Does anyone have head suggestions that will drop this down a considerable amount? The chamber is 53cc which I would think I could do much better on, but I`m not sure if I can get the compression down far enough. Anyone have any head reccomendations? I have the stock LT-1 heads sitting here, but I don`t think much can be done with them. The pistons are flat top J&E. Thanks for any help.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 08:21 PM
  #2  
Jason Short's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,051
From: Rochester, NY USA
For a blower, you are going to want your static compression to be less than ~9.5:1. That is not possible with a head gasket or even opening up the chambers.

In that situation it looks like you will have to go with large chamber AFR heads (~76cc), or you will have to swap out the pistons to a dished one.

That is a HUGE compression drop.....alot involved there.

HOpe this helps
Jason
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #3  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
If the heads are good you should sell them and get a set of large chamber AFR's, as Jason said. That would be the easiest, most cost effective way,

Rich Krause
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 10:35 PM
  #4  
Hawk312's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 225
From: York, Pa
What about the stock LT-1 heads that I have? I am trying to find the chamber size without luck so far, but I am pretty sure they are much higher than the LT-4 set.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #5  
Hawk312's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 225
From: York, Pa
Nevermind. I found they are just about the same. Looks like I`ll be spending alot more than I hoped.
I would like opinions though on wether it would be better to go with dished pistons and keep the smaller chamber size, or flat top pistons amd larger chamber size on an engine with forced induction. Also, any opinions on the cam selection would be welcome. I think the LT-4 cam should be ok, since the seperation and overlap isn`t that radical, correct?
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 01:48 AM
  #6  
Jim S. '95 Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 449
From: Where St. Augustine won't grow
Agreed, the simplest way to drop compression is with larger chamber AFRs. However, even with 74cc chambers and flat top pistons (say -4cc valve relief), static CR will still be upwards of 9.6:1. To go any lower, having a porter lay back the chambers a few cc's will drop compression to the sub 9.5:1 range.

What length rods in the motor? JE offers both -28cc and -31cc dished shelf pistons for 6" and 5.7" rods respectively, but that requires tearing down the motor and rebalancing the rotating assembly.
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 09:18 PM
  #7  
Lonnie Pavtis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 520
From: Perryopolis, Pa
If you have this much compression now you basically have a flat top piston, stock chamber & the 1074 FelPro gaskets with approx. .010 deck height.

Going with the thicker gasket .051" & enlarging the chambers to 65cc (the most that you can practically enlarge a LT1/LT4 stock head to) will still result in 11:1 compression. Not suitable for much boost on pump fuel.

72cc heads are 10.2:1 & 76cc are 9.8:1

All are basically rather high for a max performance street blower motor. You really need to go lower (by changing pistons) or run low boost (approx 8#) to stay out of detonation. 10 to 10.25 is the reasonable limit for boosted applications unless you like race fuel.
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 11:59 PM
  #8  
Hawk312's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 225
From: York, Pa
You really need to go lower (by changing pistons) or run low boost (approx 8#) to stay out of detonation.
I guess I should clarify that I will be running 9# at the very most (for now ) probably 8#. I will also be running 93 and not race fuel, since it will be driven on the street.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Sergio
LT1 Based Engine Tech
11
Jan 27, 2016 04:27 PM
D1SC383LT4
Parts For Sale
1
Jan 26, 2015 01:41 PM
nballisru
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Dec 14, 2014 05:01 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Nov 23, 2014 02:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.