Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

DAvid Vizard

Old Aug 6, 2005 | 03:47 AM
  #1  
Blownbird355's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 564
From: Huntington, W.V. 25701
DAvid Vizard

Anyone read his article in Popular Hot Rod on cam springs and rockers? He actually said self aligning rockers were more stable on a spintron? anyone agree,disagree?
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 07:12 AM
  #2  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Re: DAvid Vizard

Originally Posted by Blownbird355
Anyone read his article in Popular Hot Rod on cam springs and rockers? He actually said self aligning rockers were more stable on a spintron? anyone agree,disagree?
No, I didn't see that yet. Thanks for pointing it out - I am looking forward to reading it. But if he said it, I'd be reluctant to disagree with him. He has a very clear writing style and his MO is to base his conclusions on his own testing, rather than regurgitating stuff. This clear style and factual basis make him the best technical auto writer out there, IMHO. One thing I have noticed about his writing style though is that he never means more (or less) than he says. IOW, if for example his statement was just about what he saw on the Spintron and did not express the idea that SA rockers were superior in a running motor I would not assume he meant anything other than what he said. You need to read anything technical carefully in order to understand it, even Vizards excellent prose.

Rich
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Re: DAvid Vizard

Originally Posted by Blownbird355
Anyone read his article in Popular Hot Rod on cam springs and rockers? He actually said self aligning rockers were more stable on a spintron? anyone agree,disagree?
Vizard said: "Another move you might consider is the fact that self-aligning rockers that locate on the valve instead of being located by the pushrod guide plate have far better longitudinal stability."

My view is that your goal is to keep the roller on the rocker aligned with the valve stem tip. With SA rockers you are doing it at the point where it counts. With pushrod guide plates you are tryng to do it at arms length, and any motion of the rocker on it's pivot during its travel and any misalignment or angularity of the pushrod, and any flexing of the pushrod is magnified by the rocker ratio. That is probably what they saw on the Spintron. It sounds very logical to me.

Vizard is talking about longitudinal stability here, or perpendicular to the valve/pushrod, not stability in the direction of valve motion. That's the spring's job. He also goes into depth on valve bounce and rpm limits with hydraulics. It's a good read, and at 10 pages, long for a car rag. Fortunately those of us with short attention spans can take it one topic at a time.

I agree with what Rich said about DV. He speaks from experience and doesn't make wild projections. He'd probably be a lousy stock broker. He is also a good public speaker. His Brit wit shows thru.

My $.02
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
Blownbird355's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 564
From: Huntington, W.V. 25701
Re: DAvid Vizard

Yeah it was also good info on the Beehive springs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dams76
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Aug 20, 2015 08:28 AM
alphaauto
Parts For Sale
2
Jan 23, 2015 07:42 AM
rskrause
Advanced Tech
11
Sep 18, 2002 06:54 PM
David96Z
Advanced Tech
1
Jul 12, 2002 05:43 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.