DAvid Vizard
DAvid Vizard
Anyone read his article in Popular Hot Rod on cam springs and rockers? He actually said self aligning rockers were more stable on a spintron? anyone agree,disagree?
Re: DAvid Vizard
Originally Posted by Blownbird355
Anyone read his article in Popular Hot Rod on cam springs and rockers? He actually said self aligning rockers were more stable on a spintron? anyone agree,disagree?
Rich
Re: DAvid Vizard
Originally Posted by Blownbird355
Anyone read his article in Popular Hot Rod on cam springs and rockers? He actually said self aligning rockers were more stable on a spintron? anyone agree,disagree?
My view is that your goal is to keep the roller on the rocker aligned with the valve stem tip. With SA rockers you are doing it at the point where it counts. With pushrod guide plates you are tryng to do it at arms length, and any motion of the rocker on it's pivot during its travel and any misalignment or angularity of the pushrod, and any flexing of the pushrod is magnified by the rocker ratio. That is probably what they saw on the Spintron. It sounds very logical to me.
Vizard is talking about longitudinal stability here, or perpendicular to the valve/pushrod, not stability in the direction of valve motion. That's the spring's job. He also goes into depth on valve bounce and rpm limits with hydraulics. It's a good read, and at 10 pages, long for a car rag. Fortunately those of us with short attention spans can take it one topic at a time.
I agree with what Rich said about DV. He speaks from experience and doesn't make wild projections. He'd probably be a lousy stock broker.
He is also a good public speaker. His Brit wit shows thru.My $.02
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



