Big valves, small bores, and a lot of boost....
Well that is the combo that both me and a friend are doing
he has a 4.030 bore and a 2.1" intake valve and i have the same bore but with a 2.08 intake valve
Both of us have the valve shrouding on our minds. We both are aware that there could be some potential problems but we are not sure of what. We figured since this wasn't an N/A application and a lot of boost was involved, that it wouldn't make as extreme of an impact but i'm sure
Anyone shed some light?
he has a 4.030 bore and a 2.1" intake valve and i have the same bore but with a 2.08 intake valve
Both of us have the valve shrouding on our minds. We both are aware that there could be some potential problems but we are not sure of what. We figured since this wasn't an N/A application and a lot of boost was involved, that it wouldn't make as extreme of an impact but i'm sure
Anyone shed some light?
I am, too. 2.10/1.65 Manley Ti valves in 215cc RR AFRs on my NA 396...
http://www.c-zone.net/markm/JimLaBre...d/P1020025.JPG
http://www.c-zone.net/markm/JimLaBre...d/P1020025.JPG
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">I run 2.10" intake valves on my 396 (.030 over)....no shrouding problems.</font>
------------------
I'll be back
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by jimlab:
I am, too. 2.10/1.65 Manley Ti valves in 215cc RR AFRs on my NA 396...
http://www.c-zone.net/markm/JimLaBre...d/P1020025.JPG</font>
I am, too. 2.10/1.65 Manley Ti valves in 215cc RR AFRs on my NA 396...
http://www.c-zone.net/markm/JimLaBre...d/P1020025.JPG</font>
what would that cost me?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM




