Best sb head?
Originally posted by mikez281LE
You are right in terms of them not being on the race track, I know I cant afford them $15k yikes. But for the unlimited they are pretty much it as of now.
I found a link that has some good info and dyno numbers.
http://www.projecttransam.com/coates.asp
You are right in terms of them not being on the race track, I know I cant afford them $15k yikes. But for the unlimited they are pretty much it as of now.
I found a link that has some good info and dyno numbers.
http://www.projecttransam.com/coates.asp
I really want to see that 5.0L Ford spinning 14, 750 rpm! That's over 7300 f/min average piston speed. Bet it doesn't run long there.

So who's setting records with Coates-equipped engines?
Sorry, but I'm still a little skeptical, even after almost 15 years.
Originally posted by OldSStroker
So who's setting records with Coates-equipped engines?
Sorry, but I'm still a little skeptical, even after almost 15 years.
So who's setting records with Coates-equipped engines?
Sorry, but I'm still a little skeptical, even after almost 15 years.
The information they had on their old site (which I believe was nearly word for word from a magazine article from a few years ago which read like they authored it) talked about their test Ford small block that I thought I remembered them claiming ~700 horsepower for and turning to 14,000 rpm. Once, at least.

I've never heard of the 1,000 horsepower SBC story or seen it on their site. Besides, 850 lb-ft. @ 8,000 rpm would be 1,295 horsepower. If someone were running these heads in "real life", I think we'd have heard about it by now.
Last edited by jimlab; Nov 29, 2003 at 12:18 AM.
I have heard that sealing the combustion gasses, and getting those seals to last at auto engine rpms could be a problem with the Coates system. The 855 CID gas pumper turns quite a bit slower.
F1 engine technology is probably at the leading edge of what can be done given enough money and talent. AFAIK, rotary valves haven't been sucessfully used there. At 19,200 rpm, cam acuated poppet valves with pneumatic springs are still where it's at. While F1 folks have admitted to trying camless, solenoid actuated valves in their engine development, I have not read of one running in competition. That will probably come, not because it allows higher rpm, but because it allows almost infinitely variable valve timing.
My $.02
F1 engine technology is probably at the leading edge of what can be done given enough money and talent. AFAIK, rotary valves haven't been sucessfully used there. At 19,200 rpm, cam acuated poppet valves with pneumatic springs are still where it's at. While F1 folks have admitted to trying camless, solenoid actuated valves in their engine development, I have not read of one running in competition. That will probably come, not because it allows higher rpm, but because it allows almost infinitely variable valve timing.
My $.02
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Victor Lamb
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
Aug 26, 2017 02:52 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM



