5.7'' or 6'' rod for 383
What is your DCR? Your cam has everything to do with your Dynamic Compression Ratio. Shifting around the lobes will definately alter your DCR and you may end up with a car that may not perform as you vision it.
How do you measure or calculate DCR? and how does the cam lobe effect it?
I am shooting to get a CR of 8.3:1, but I have to do a search or something to figure out what DCR is and how it is to be taken into consideration.
Thanks for the info
I am shooting to get a CR of 8.3:1, but I have to do a search or something to figure out what DCR is and how it is to be taken into consideration.
Thanks for the info
Ok I found out some info here http://members.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html about DCR, but after reading it I am still a little confused, what would be a good DCR for a forced induction motor. or how can I calculate DCR + boost to get near what is recommended? they said a good # is around 8.25:1 DCR, I can't download any of these calculators because I am at work and these machines are not able to accept downloads.
thanks for the info and help
thanks for the info and help
Originally posted by 1SlowFormula
Ok I found out some info here http://members.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html about DCR, but after reading it I am still a little confused, what would be a good DCR for a forced induction motor. or how can I calculate DCR + boost to get near what is recommended? they said a good # is around 8.25:1 DCR, I can't download any of these calculators because I am at work and these machines are not able to accept downloads.
thanks for the info and help
Ok I found out some info here http://members.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html about DCR, but after reading it I am still a little confused, what would be a good DCR for a forced induction motor. or how can I calculate DCR + boost to get near what is recommended? they said a good # is around 8.25:1 DCR, I can't download any of these calculators because I am at work and these machines are not able to accept downloads.
thanks for the info and help
Rich Krause
The DCR range is between 8.5 - 7.5. It is best to edge to the lower end of the range for boost applications. The upper range is for NA and/or N2O. At home, download the calculator and it should help you with Head chamber volume, head gasket thickness, quench, etc...
Originally posted by Wild1
The DCR range is between 8.5 - 7.5. It is best to edge to the lower end of the range for boost applications. The upper range is for NA and/or N2O. At home, download the calculator and it should help you with Head chamber volume, head gasket thickness, quench, etc...
The DCR range is between 8.5 - 7.5. It is best to edge to the lower end of the range for boost applications. The upper range is for NA and/or N2O. At home, download the calculator and it should help you with Head chamber volume, head gasket thickness, quench, etc...
Rich Krause
Don't some of the DCR calculators have the ability to include the lbs of boost in the calculation? At least i think i recall coming accross one at some point. If so then you would be going for the same target DCR for the grade gas you want to use.
Originally posted by 94formulabz
Don't some of the DCR calculators have the ability to include the lbs of boost in the calculation? At least i think i recall coming accross one at some point. If so then you would be going for the same target DCR for the grade gas you want to use.
Don't some of the DCR calculators have the ability to include the lbs of boost in the calculation? At least i think i recall coming accross one at some point. If so then you would be going for the same target DCR for the grade gas you want to use.
Rich Krause
I see what your saying about the definition Rich. I didn't visit that link, I was just recalling something from when i was reading up months ago.
For what its worth here is the link i was talking about, i found it again pretty easily.
I guess their calculator takes it a step further and incorperates operating conditions, which isn't consistent with the definition of dynamic compression being used by others. They also recomend using the .05 duration instead of .006 which can have a large effect on the number it spits out.
-brent
For what its worth here is the link i was talking about, i found it again pretty easily.
I guess their calculator takes it a step further and incorperates operating conditions, which isn't consistent with the definition of dynamic compression being used by others. They also recomend using the .05 duration instead of .006 which can have a large effect on the number it spits out.
-brent
Last edited by 94formulabz; Nov 20, 2003 at 06:00 PM.
Originally posted by 94formulabz
I see what your saying about the definition Rich. I didn't visit that link, I was just recalling something from when i was reading up months ago.
For what its worth here is the link i was talking about, i found it again pretty easily.
I guess their calculator takes it a step further and incorperates operating conditions, which isn't consistent with the definition of dynamic compression being used by others.
-brent
I see what your saying about the definition Rich. I didn't visit that link, I was just recalling something from when i was reading up months ago.
For what its worth here is the link i was talking about, i found it again pretty easily.
I guess their calculator takes it a step further and incorperates operating conditions, which isn't consistent with the definition of dynamic compression being used by others.
-brent
Rich Krause
Obviously i had nothing to do with developing that calculator, but here are my thoughts on it.
An estimation of cylinder pressure is ultimately what we are interested in to find out if the grade of fuel we desire to run will autoignite under that condition. CR is a ratio of volumes, which does not directly relate to the pressure due to temperature changes, but it is proportional. Raise CR, and your cranking cylinder pressure goes up. Same thing with DCR which is the actual 'Trapped Volume'.
DCR is an attempt to estimate what the cylinder pressures will be by adjusting the volume for the IVC but without accounting for variations in head flow. If you had really crappy heads with a low VE then you could run a higher compression ratio without detonation right? Of course there are other things that contribute like chamber design, but DCR infers the cylinder pressure and thats why we look at it right?
I guess it all boils down to picking a intake vavle closing point close to that of another known configuration that doesn't Knock. The rest of the cam selection is about tuning for the inertial effects of the air to maximize VE.
An estimation of cylinder pressure is ultimately what we are interested in to find out if the grade of fuel we desire to run will autoignite under that condition. CR is a ratio of volumes, which does not directly relate to the pressure due to temperature changes, but it is proportional. Raise CR, and your cranking cylinder pressure goes up. Same thing with DCR which is the actual 'Trapped Volume'.
DCR is an attempt to estimate what the cylinder pressures will be by adjusting the volume for the IVC but without accounting for variations in head flow. If you had really crappy heads with a low VE then you could run a higher compression ratio without detonation right? Of course there are other things that contribute like chamber design, but DCR infers the cylinder pressure and thats why we look at it right?
I guess it all boils down to picking a intake vavle closing point close to that of another known configuration that doesn't Knock. The rest of the cam selection is about tuning for the inertial effects of the air to maximize VE.
94formulabz,
Thanks for showing me that it was kindof what I was asking about, even though it was set up for a motorcycle turbo calculation it still seems to work.
How do you get the Deg that the intake valve closes?
For example would a 230* advertised duration actualy be 230-180(to get to botom center) = 50* ABDC or is there a calculation to determine it?
Thanks for all the help and suggestions everyone.
Thanks for showing me that it was kindof what I was asking about, even though it was set up for a motorcycle turbo calculation it still seems to work.
How do you get the Deg that the intake valve closes?
For example would a 230* advertised duration actualy be 230-180(to get to botom center) = 50* ABDC or is there a calculation to determine it?
Thanks for all the help and suggestions everyone.
if that is how I was suposed to get X* ABDC then this was my output from that calculator
That said I should have a CR including boost and altitude conditions added to static = 11.86 :1
So that means I should be fine to run up top 10# of boost and still run pump gas and up the boost at the track and use race gas.
Is this correct???
Camshaft, Rod Length, Boost and Altitude Correction to Compression
Your engine summary is as follows: Bore 4.030 inches, stroke 3.75 inches, rod c-c length 5.7 inches, with a static compression ratio of 8 :1. Your camshaft specifications call for an inlet valve closing of 50 degrees ABDC (after bottom dead center).
Your chamber volume is 111.98 cc's. With this camshaft your dynamic, or effective stroke is 3.26 inches. Your dynamic compression ratio is 7.06 :1 corrected for cam timing, altitude, and rod length. Your dynamic cranking pressure, corrected for cam timing, rod length and altitude is 135.02 PSI. Your dynamic boost compression ratio, reflecting static c.r., cam timing, altitude, and 10 PSI is 11.86 :1.
Your engine summary is as follows: Bore 4.030 inches, stroke 3.75 inches, rod c-c length 5.7 inches, with a static compression ratio of 8 :1. Your camshaft specifications call for an inlet valve closing of 50 degrees ABDC (after bottom dead center).
Your chamber volume is 111.98 cc's. With this camshaft your dynamic, or effective stroke is 3.26 inches. Your dynamic compression ratio is 7.06 :1 corrected for cam timing, altitude, and rod length. Your dynamic cranking pressure, corrected for cam timing, rod length and altitude is 135.02 PSI. Your dynamic boost compression ratio, reflecting static c.r., cam timing, altitude, and 10 PSI is 11.86 :1.
So that means I should be fine to run up top 10# of boost and still run pump gas and up the boost at the track and use race gas.
Is this correct???
Originally posted by 1SlowFormula
if that is how I was suposed to get X* ABDC then this was my output from that calculator
That said I should have a CR including boost and altitude conditions added to static = 11.86 :1
So that means I should be fine to run up top 10# of boost and still run pump gas and up the boost at the track and use race gas.
Is this correct???
if that is how I was suposed to get X* ABDC then this was my output from that calculator
That said I should have a CR including boost and altitude conditions added to static = 11.86 :1
So that means I should be fine to run up top 10# of boost and still run pump gas and up the boost at the track and use race gas.
Is this correct???
Rich Krause
Originally posted by rskrause
That looks ok to me. You will still need to be careful with tuning. Not run too much timing and be sure the AF ratio is good (not leaner than 12.5:1, maybe a bit richer). Water injection also helps.
Rich Krause
That looks ok to me. You will still need to be careful with tuning. Not run too much timing and be sure the AF ratio is good (not leaner than 12.5:1, maybe a bit richer). Water injection also helps.
Rich Krause
thanks for the help, I am going to need to follow your lead and run 8:1 static CR to be able to run the pump gas.
Another question for you, since you run a 95 also, what have you found to be the best scan tool to read O2's (or AF ratio) for tuning and such, I have used free scan to read everything and I do my own (NA) tuning with tunercat, but jumping into FI, I don't know how much I can trust free scan since it wasn't even designed for this car.


