piston trouble
piston trouble
im building a 383 stroker bored .30 over with a 3.75 stroke. i want to run 6.000 h beam connecting rods properly clearenced.. for some resaon ive forgotten the equation used to determine the piston height. i know i need dual valve reliefs and flat tops.. i would appreciate any help.
im using a comp cams 230/236/112 Hydraullic roller
im still debating trickflow or AFR aluminum heads min 200 cfm
moroso pan
FIRST TPI intake
hooker LT
and a whole lot more goodies soon..
im using a comp cams 230/236/112 Hydraullic roller
im still debating trickflow or AFR aluminum heads min 200 cfm
moroso pan
FIRST TPI intake
hooker LT
and a whole lot more goodies soon..
It's always best to speak with the piston manufacturer to see what they recommend for 6.00" H-Beams.
I would even bolt a head on with an old gasket and a layer of clay putty on top of the piston. Turn it over by hand and see if it hits, and/or measure how much clearance is really there.
Make sure the heads can handle the lift too.
I would even bolt a head on with an old gasket and a layer of clay putty on top of the piston. Turn it over by hand and see if it hits, and/or measure how much clearance is really there.
Make sure the heads can handle the lift too.
most def..but i thought there was an equation...something like deck height from the bottom of the stroke plus width of the gasket and something else.. i just cant remember and something with .40 being a good number between the top of the piston and bottom of the head or valve.. damn i wish i could remember..thanks for the help though
http://www.kb-silvolite.com/calc.php?action=deck
Scroll down and they have calculators for just about everything.
Scroll down and they have calculators for just about everything.
I'm moving soon so all my books and mags are packed away..
How about this?
http://www.hotrod.com/howto/69883_st...ine/index.html
How about this?
http://www.hotrod.com/howto/69883_st...ine/index.html
Deck Height - (Stroke/2 + Rod Length + Piston Deck Clearance) = Compression Height
9.025 - (3.75/2 + 5.7 + 0.025) = 1.425
9.025 - (3.75/2 + 5.7 + 0.025) = 1.425
just a question but why 6.0 rods. they make no more power and put the pin into the oil control ring higher. i noticed they start to use oil sooner
Because they reduce side loading on the cylinder walls(angularity), especially with the 3.75" stroke. And they reduce piston speed...all equates into less heat, less wear, and a more reliable motor.
be careful of the piston because i see alot of problems with oil consumption over 20k miles or so(some worse than others). not all pistons are the same so watch out. the first problem i ran into was with a kb piston with the space between the first and second land. the oil control ring was in the pin area. i love a longer rod motor but i see problems on some 383 combos. i believe srp put the rings near the top but don't quote me. i build alot of performance STREET motors that run alot of miles.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gonzo275rltw
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Sep 5, 2015 06:26 PM
gonzo275rltw
LS1 Based Engine Tech
2
Sep 5, 2015 06:24 PM



