3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related
View Poll Results: Should one stay with a 305 or swap to a 350?
Keep the 305
7
18.42%
Swap it for a 350
18
47.37%
Swap it for something larger 383+
13
34.21%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

305 v 350 poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
Yossarian14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 228
From: South Bend, Indiana
305 v 350 poll

Alright I asked the question what do about my engine so I'll let you guys decide. Should someone with a third gen camaro (LG4) 305 stick with the 305 or swap it for a 350. Many people say that the 350's make quite bit more power but I doubt it
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #2  
85_305's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Just keep the damned 305; same damn thing with the same damn potential.
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #3  
Pneumatic_Tire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 439
From: Kettering Ohio
Re: 305 v 350 poll

It all depends on what you want out of your camaro. Do you want insane hp/torque that makes it difficult to be a daily driver? Or do you want something to simply blow away the ricers that flood our streets? That is the question. You will get a variety of biased opinions, and some honest here. Many guys with 350's will say get a 350, guys with the 305's will say keep the 305. You gotta decide this one yourself on basically what you want your camaro to do.
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
85_305's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Very well put, Jon
BTW.. where the fock have you been lately?
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:11 AM
  #5  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: 305 v 350 poll

350!! i speak from expeirence of the swap. and they dont have the same potential. mod to mod the 350 will put out more hp/tq.theres no replacement for displacment.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:15 AM
  #6  
aklim's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,249
Re: 305 v 350 poll

All things being equal, there is no replacement for displacement.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:27 AM
  #7  
V8Rumble's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
From: A half-fender ahead, & pulling...
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Originally Posted by 92rslt1
350!! i speak from expeirence of the swap. and they dont have the same potential. mod to mod the 350 will put out more hp/tq.theres no replacement for displacment.
I would tend to agree, for one main reason - cylinder diameter. A 350 simply won't "shroud" your valves as much as the smaller 305 bore will. If you were talking about a (hypothetical) 305 that had the same bore diameter as a 350, then I'd believe that the 350 would make about 15% more power, just due to the difference in displacement. (In other words, aside from the displacement difference, they'd be exactly the same.) But since the 350 has a markedly better flow potential, I'd expect the difference to be more like 20% - if not a little more...

Just my $.02...
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:39 AM
  #8  
92BLKL98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 212
From: Powder Springs, Ga. USA
Re: 305 v 350 poll

I voted for the 350 because IMO the 350 can be so much more. When you spend dollar for dollar the potential realized is much more. Personally I would prefer more CI's but then that is me and if you aren't sure stay with mild 350. Granted you can build a 305 to kick a$$ on a 350. But a comparably built 350 will be the victor. Plus a 305 does have its limits. A CID limit of approximately 345 CI for the 305 vs the 396 based on a 350 or a 454 CI SBC based on the World 400 block. You just have to decide how wild you want to go. The way I see it the more you get the more you will want so do what you can afford and enjoy.

Last edited by 92BLKL98; Dec 29, 2004 at 12:47 AM.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 02:45 AM
  #9  
ChevyTuffD.A.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,214
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Re: 305 v 350 poll

The 305 is seriously one of the worse motors that GM has ever built, right behind the Iron Duke (4 cylinder diesel GM once made). A 305 doesnt even have a 4" piston, compared to the 350. Hands down the 350 has WAY more power potential, gets more bang for the buck out of mods, and is most certaintly streetable. 350
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #10  
phoenixrising's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Wass up all, I'm new to the site...this maybe old news for ya guys but when I first saw this recently---I said to myself, "WTF?" Has anyone else here seen this yet?:

http://www.hioutput.com/tech/400hp/400hp.html
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 08:36 AM
  #11  
Sunsceamer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 245
Re: 305 v 350 poll

For high 13's in a camaro or low 14's an ddecent cam 305 will do fine and only with going to a 2000 stall mild cam 9.5 compression w/od auto and gearswhich is very drivable. or a stock cam 350 with gears so no lope with gears is doable for perfect daily driving 13 sec car with a/c and no gutting.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 09:20 AM
  #12  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Since its an LG4--I said swap for the 350.

If you had a 305 TPI 5 speed I would have voted to keep it.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #13  
87camracer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Originally Posted by 85_305
Just keep the damned 305; same damn thing with the same damn potential.
absolutely wrong. the 305 is THE WORST engine GM has ever made. period. it has NO potential. the only reason i would keep the 305 is if i was on a budget and doing some sort of forced induction setup (like a turbo). other than that the 305 will ALWAYS be slower than the 350. always.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #14  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Re: 305 v 350 poll

While it has a smaller bore and less cubic inches it hardly the worst engine GM ever made. Lasted 25 years or so

My Players IROC did 14.5 with no mods. Which makes it faster then some of the "muscle cars" from the 60's.
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 10:36 AM
  #15  
gun4hire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 750
From: San Antonio, TX
Re: 305 v 350 poll

Originally Posted by 305fan
While it has a smaller bore and less cubic inches it hardly the worst engine GM ever made. Lasted 25 years or so

My Players IROC did 14.5 with no mods. Which makes it faster then some of the "muscle cars" from the 60's.
Probably a TPI car, right? This guy has a LG4 305. It is a tiny motor with a tiny peanut cam.

That being said...if you have a T-5, you are better off sticking with the LG4 since a T5 probably* wont hold up to the power of a modded 350 - so you'd have to invest more $$$ in a tranny swap to a T56 or auto...

My advice is that if you wanna go fast, trade up to 350 TPI motor'd car...then start modding from there. To me it makes more sense than dumping $3k into a motor build that the rest of the drivetrain just can't handle.

* Disclaimer: I know there are folks out there running sub-13's on T5's, but the majority of folks who try this fail.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.