3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

2000 vette T56 Direct Swap???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #1  
BoulderCamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18
From: Boulder, Colorado
2000 vette T56 Direct Swap???

RE: 92 RS w/ 305 and 700R4

Oh yes...I'm finally going to swap in six gears! I've read the info on thirdgen.org but I can't find anything about the 98+ T56 nor anything on the vette T56.

Anyone know if I can use a 2000 vette T56 as a direct swap into my previously equipped 700r4?

Anyone have any info on the 98+ T56 in the camaro?
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 02:10 PM
  #2  
82355's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 274
From: Albion, Nebraska, USA
Yeah, the Vette uses a transaxle. Pretty sure it is completely worthless to you.

Martin
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 02:11 PM
  #3  
AutoRoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,342
From: MI
I would stick with a 94-97 Model T56 trans. just my opinion because I've seen that swap work correctly.
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 03:22 PM
  #4  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Ditto on both replies. LS1 T56's (like the '00 Vette) have a different input shaft and bellhousing, I think that's it. '93 has the weird 1st gear so like AutoRoc said, I'd go with 4-7. Good luck!

-Rippin
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 05:28 PM
  #5  
Dave89IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,676
From: Melvindale, MI, US
C5 vettes do NOT use the T56, they use a trans that is mounted in the rear, connected to the engine viea a shaft and torque tube, I think the transaxle they use in german made? not sure though
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #6  
TheGreatJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,677
From: T-town
The 'Vette trans is totally different....you'd have to swap in the whole transaxle/IRS setup (which requires extensive floorpan and chassis hack-work) as well as the torque tube and clutch setup and it would really be a LOT more trouble than it's worth.

The LS1 F-body trans is no good unless you're swapping in an LS1. The input shaft, bellhousing, clutch setup, and other minor things are different enough to make it unfeasible.

The 93-97 T-56 is almost a direct bolt-in. You need a conversion crossmember, a speedo convertor, and a conversion flywheel (if you have an early-model engine.) The '93 trannys have deeper gear ratios and a slightly lower power rating than the later years. If you want more info on ratings and ratios PM me.
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
RobsWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 466
From: Diamondhead, MS
Originally posted by Dave89IROC
C5 vettes do NOT use the T56, they use a trans that is mounted in the rear, connected to the engine viea a shaft and torque tube, I think the transaxle they use in german made? not sure though
The C5 uses a T56 that is connected via a torque tube. C4 used a ZF 6spd from Germany.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ch3vyb1gbl0ck
Classic Engine Tech
3
Oct 23, 2023 08:07 PM
Klypto
LS1 Based Engine Tech
11
Mar 23, 2016 09:05 AM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
jayvar
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Feb 2, 2015 10:00 PM
bonniew
Events and Cruise Spots
0
Jan 18, 2015 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.