2010 - 2015 Camaro Wheels, Tires, Brakes, Suspension Discussion for 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Chevrolet Camaro Wheels | Tires | Brakes | Suspension

[Suspension] Do we like the IRS for the 5TH gen

Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #16  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The square ones were much more stable. I've seen plenty of round wheeled cars lose control. It's an inherent flaw in the rounded wheel.
Yeah. I love the way the corners of the old square wheels would just dig right in to ice and snow. We never lost traction!
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:47 AM
  #17  
Ron78Z&01SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by Z284ever
IRS sux. So does fuel injection. I really never trusted those new fangled round wheels either.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #18  
2lane69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 270
From: Minneapolis
I sure hope they bring back the powerglide too! My '66 Impala and my '63 Corvair were so darned efficient with that tranny, who needs more gears!

Bring back the Bias Ply tires and drum brakes too! Those were the days!

Old Dec 8, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #19  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Ooh, ooh, and can we get a hand-crank starter??? How 'bout a horse pulling it, and a set of reigns??
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #20  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
Ooh, ooh, and can we get a hand-crank starter??? How 'bout a horse pulling it, and a set of reigns??
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #21  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
...

back on topic.. yes.. IRS is a great thing IMO... so there are a very small minority of hardcore drag racing types who won't be happy with it...

nothing personal to them, but their opinions are insiginificant compared to the public perception of IRS vs live axle.. how it will be recieved in the media and the general public, and add to that the better ride and handling...

there have been a few times taking an on-ramp pretty quick when there was a bump mid-turn that scooted my rear end over.. kinda freaky...
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #22  
94Camaro_Z_28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 888
From: La Porte City, Iowa
I'm amazed the 4th gens handled as well as they did with a live axle.......which leaves me drooling over the possibilities of an IRS setup...
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #23  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by 94Camaro_Z_28
I'm amazed the 4th gens handled as well as they did with a live axle.......which leaves me drooling over the possibilities of an IRS setup...
The negatives about LRA handling are only on bumpy/inconsistent surfaces. On a smooth, flat road, in otherwise identical cars, you'd literally never notice a difference in handling between the two setups.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #24  
Dee94Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 79
From: Bushkill pa
So IRS is the way to go? If the Vette uses it then I guess it is good for the Camaro
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:04 PM
  #25  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by 2lane69
I sure hope they bring back the powerglide too! My '66 Impala and my '63 Corvair were so darned efficient with that tranny, who needs more gears!
Yeah, right on! All of these 3, 4, 5 and now 6 speed trannies. What - are they trying to show off or something? How about some relish on that hotdog.

No thanks. I've heard bad things about all of those EXTRA shifts.
Old Dec 11, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #26  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Anyone else up for leaf springs?? Cant have traction bars without leaf springs and this thing needs traction!!!!!!!!
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #27  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
A couple cinder blocks in the back should add a little more weight, give a little better traction . Or maybe some chains on the tires, since it's gonna sit like a 4x4 anyway, might as well be able to get some good off-road traction .
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #28  
Whitten's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 149
I was actually just thinking about it today I can't wait to see and IRS under the Camaro. I want this car to impress everyone that drives it all the way down to the most basic models.

I want to read that the v6 base model out handles any of the Mustangs, and that the upper models are the best handling most all around versitle muscle cars ever built...but that is just me.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #29  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,082
From: San Juan PR
the point is cost...

cost of repairs.. that means you get upper control arms and lower control arms.. bushings etc... isn't a live axle more cost effective???
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #30  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by The Highlander
isn't a live axle more cost effective???
A live axle is cheaper, if that's what you mean.

An IRS will probably sell more cars, and you'd have to take that into account if you were analyzing cost effectiveness.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.