2010 - 2015 Camaro Wheels, Tires, Brakes, Suspension Discussion for 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Chevrolet Camaro Wheels | Tires | Brakes | Suspension

[Suspension] Do we like the IRS for the 5TH gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #31  
Compstall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
Ooh, ooh, and can we get a hand-crank starter??? How 'bout a horse pulling it, and a set of reigns??
...and we could upgrade it with an oil-bath carburetor!!
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #32  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by Z284ever
IRS sux. So does fuel injection. I really never trusted those new fangled round wheels either.
Dude, things were so much better when wheels where square with square holes in the middle!
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #33  
BigRedCornhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
IRS is a good thing i like it!!!!!
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #34  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
No problems here!
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 05:49 PM
  #35  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Indiffrent myself, just depends on the car. Then again it gets a little tiresome hearing about the greatness of IRS and how it solves all the evil in the world and makes little babies smile.
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #36  
2K1SunsetSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 649
From: Clinton TWP, MI
As long as it will handle the power and not wheel hop I am ok with IRS.
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #37  
rod442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 385
From: Ypsilanti, MI
Originally Posted by 2K1SunsetSS
As long as it will handle the power and not wheel hop I am ok with IRS.
that pretty much sums it up. plus the cost factor.

Ford went away from the IRS in the previous cobra's when the new Shelby came out. I would guess that this had to do with the car needing to come in at a specific cost, OR it wasn't up to the task of handling the extra TQ.

that being said, I am FINE with IRS in the new camaro. IF it doesn't raise the price of the car to be "over the top"; which IMO would be more than the msrp of the last GTO's. preferrably even a little less for a low option Z28 (or whatever they call it). and thats around 28-32.

AND the IRS has to work more like the c5 and up IRS; in that it will handle more power than a stock 4th gen live axle, with almost no weight penalty. UNLIKE the GTO and the CTSV, which DO wheelhop, and aren't known to handle clutch dumps too well.

So, if it doesn't cost too much, handles moderate HP upgrades from stock (IE, average LS2 heads/cam numbers) and doesn't add significant weight; its IRS for me. Sound like I want my cake and be able to eat it too? lol.

Otherwise, in a performance car that more people will dragrace rather than roadrace they should go live axle. save the costs, weight penalty, and complexity to service.
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #38  
toegead93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 616
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Dee94Z28
Hey guys and gals tell me what you think of the 5TH gen getting IRS good or bad?
good
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #39  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by rod442
Otherwise, in a performance car that more people will dragrace rather than roadrace they should go live axle. save the costs, weight penalty, and complexity to service.
Actually, the majority of Camaros will probably be STREET driven, so the IRS will come in pretty handy there . Like it or not, a few die-hard drag racers aren't going to convince GM to build ~10,000 cars to suit their needs and let the other ~90,000 owners suffer a car that doesn't ride as nice .

I'm sure the aftermarket will come up with some design to compensate wherever GM lacks?
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #40  
mourningyou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
Actually, the majority of Camaros will probably be STREET driven, so the IRS will come in pretty handy there . Like it or not, a few die-hard drag racers aren't going to convince GM to build ~10,000 cars to suit their needs and let the other ~90,000 owners suffer a car that doesn't ride as nice .

I'm sure the aftermarket will come up with some design to compensate wherever GM lacks?
yes, the aftermarket is always up to fix gm's various blunders.

Just put a 12-bolt in it.
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #41  
ToneC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 30
IRS is the way to go

For the masses anyway. I don't think it should affect it's drag racing capability. The Vette is a pretty good dragster isn't it??

I know some of those jokers run some serious power too.

Last edited by ToneC; Jan 20, 2007 at 02:36 PM.
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #42  
Rampant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 188
Lack of an IRS is one of my turn-offs to the Mustang.
IRS = good thing.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 11:53 PM
  #43  
wicks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
irs

Irs Is The Way To Go But Lets Pray We Dont Get 7.50 Gearing
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #44  
camarolvr69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 138
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by wicks
Irs Is The Way To Go But Lets Pray We Dont Get 7.50 Gearing
yeah i never understood why we got s-10 7.5 rears and friggin vans and light pickups got 14 bolts.
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #45  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by camarolvr69
yeah i never understood why we got s-10 7.5 rears and friggin vans and light pickups got 14 bolts.
The light trucks ddn't get 14 bolts... they got 10 bolts.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.