2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums
View Poll Results: What engine would you rather see?
7.0---427!
148
52.11%
6.2 S/C
136
47.89%
Voters: 284. You may not vote on this poll

7.0 or 6.2 S/C

Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #1  
305fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
7.0 or 6.2 S/C

If you had your choice--would the top engine Camaro be--the 7.0 or 6.2 S/C?

I'd take the 7.0--aka 427. It has heritage and cache. I mean Ford has to S/C there V8s to get them to go----Gm has never had to! Why start now?

Add VVT and DI to the 427--get the costs down and drop her in, GM!! Yeah I know it's not gonna happen
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #2  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
I voted for the supercharged 6.2. Today's superchargers are far more liveable in real world conditions, and the LS7 is reported to be DOA by the time Camaro returns.
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #3  
Executioner2k5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 559
From: Arlington, TX
7.0/427 FTW N/A All The Way!
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #4  
8cylinders>4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 225
6.2 supercharged baby, which would mean forged internals from the factory which is a good thing
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 06:48 AM
  #5  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
I would definitely take the supercharged engine. A pulley swap and tune will lead to some very nice results.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #6  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Size matters .

Do you want 6.2 on viagra, or 7.0 going strong, all natural?

Ok, but seriously, I like the ring that 427 c.i. has to it . And I don't care if "the LS7 is dead after '08" or whatever. Just because a 3-letter designation is done, doesn't mean that displacement can't be used again . How many designations did the 350 SBC have over it's life?! Way too many to list!

Give us an LS7 derivative ... not "THE" LS7 ... just the same long block. The dry sump system can go ... a traditional oil pan will suffice . It has all the same outer dimensions as an LS1/2/6, so there's no issue FITTING it in the car. And if it's MASS produced vs. limited build like the current C6Z, then the cost shouldn't be much more (unless they stick with the titanium internals, which again, could be substituted for cost purposes, if necessary).

That's my $.02 .
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
I tend to come fromt he school of "pure displacement over force fed air"; however, if the numbers that people are speculating do turn out to be true with the 6.2, then 600+HP would be hard to argue with regardless of how you get the result. Odds are if i were to buy either option (which I have no intentions of doing anyway) I wouldn't mod either of them anyway, so I would prefer the option with the highest initial HP.

Personally, I would like to put 625HP on the cowl instead of 427ci.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Well the 7 litre is nice but if I can have similar power form a cheaper motor and make a simple pulley swap to add another 50-100hp I'll take the 6.2 supercharged, can't do that with a naturally aspirated engine without a lot of money. Plus the 7 liter is already running really high compression so no aftermarket supercharger without changing pistons.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #9  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
Give us an LS7 derivative ... not "THE" LS7 ... just the same long block. The dry sump system can go ... a traditional oil pan will suffice . It has all the same outer dimensions as an LS1/2/6, so there's no issue FITTING it in the car. And if it's MASS produced vs. limited build like the current C6Z, then the cost shouldn't be much more (unless they stick with the titanium internals, which again, could be substituted for cost purposes, if necessary).

That's my $.02 .
If they could mass produce the now handbuilt LS7 minus the dry sump system that would be a different story altogether. However as they are moving towards the S/C 6.2L motor for the Vette, having a similar motor that can be massed produced alongside it will go along way to reduce production costs.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #10  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
427
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #11  
Mjolnir's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
I feel like the debate over S/C 6.2 vs. N/A 7.0 is fairly easy to solve. Do a quick search of these boards and find out what kind of respect the 04 Mustang Cobra gets. That thing puts out over 550 RWHP with a tune, exhaust, and simple bolt-ons. You never even have to change the cams or heads. That's from a 4.6 OHC motor.

Our motor has about 95 more cubic inches, and is a platform that has made more HP per CI than Ford motors since about 1955. Okay, okay, I exaggerate... but you get the point. We definitely whoop *** HP per CI on the modular NA 4.6/5.4.

If we get a blown small block from the factory, we could seriously be looking at 700 Rear Wheel Horse Power for the cost of the car plus about $2500 to $3000, and that's if you pay someone to install the exhaust.

How many of us would like to buy a car, spend less than 10% of the purchase price in mods, and be able to absolutely destroy almost anything on the road? There isn't a Mustang out there that's anywhere near stock that could compete with that, not even their "Terminator".

Hell, most Ferrari's, Porsche Turbo's and SL65's would have trouble competing with that.
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #12  
myslowcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: fairless hills pa
Originally Posted by 8cylinders>4
6.2 supercharged baby, which would mean forged internals from the factory which is a good thing
and a rear that would hold it together
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #13  
JCCamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 102
From: NC but stationed in WA
i'd have to say the 6.2, i like the idea of adding lots of horsepower cheaply, considering the price we will pay for the car in the first place
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 01:17 PM
  #14  
km9v's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,296
From: Beaumont, TX
How about a 2.2 VTEC Turbo instead?
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #15  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by km9v
How about a 2.2 VTEC Turbo instead?
You think you're so cool, don't you??

How about a Type-R sticker while you're at it?!??!




Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.