2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

5.3 V8 DI 400HP as the BASE V8

Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
2001Firehawk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 284
From: Pa
5.3 V8 DI 400HP as the BASE V8

Got to thinking about Scott saying that we're in for some big surprises.

The biggest surprise I believe, will be what the BASE V8 will be.

From the get-go, I believed that the Camaro, was going to be the showcase vehicle, for the next generation of V8 engines.

The design goal will probaby be a BASE V8 with 100HP more, than the BASE V6.

With a 2.0L 260HP I4 , & a 3.6L 304HP V6 already done.
The time for the DI V8 is here now.

With everyone knowing that it won't be the LS2 , & thinking that it will be the LS3, I think that we'll be in for a nice surprise...
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #2  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by 2001Firehawk
Got to thinking about Scott saying that we're in for some big surprises.

The biggest surprise I believe, will be what the BASE V8 will be.

From the get-go, I believed that the Camaro, was going to be the showcase vehicle, for the next generation of V8 engines.

The design goal will probaby be a BASE V8 with 100HP more, than the BASE V6.

With a 2.0L 260HP I4 , & a 3.6L 304HP V6 already done.
The time for the DI V8 is here now.

With everyone knowing that it won't be the LS2 , & thinking that it will be the LS3, I think that we'll be in for a nice surprise...
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
SManZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
From: Manassas, VA
I don't know much about the 5.3 motor...what would its advantages be? Is it DOD capable? DI would provide better mileage - do you expect mileage figures to be better than with LS3?

Just curious and want to learn more
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #4  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by SManZ
I don't know much about the 5.3 motor...what would its advantages be? Is it DOD capable? DI would provide better mileage - do you expect mileage figures to be better than with LS3?

Just curious and want to learn more
Unless GM is developing a new RWD 5.3L V8, the only 5.3L V8s in the lineup right now are the Vortec truck engines. They put out between 315-320 HP and 340 lb.ft. of torque.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #5  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Unless GM is developing a new RWD 5.3L V8, the only 5.3L V8s in the lineup right now are the Vortec truck engines. They put out between 315-320 HP and 340 lb.ft. of torque.
He could be talking about the LS4, which I have in the Impala, but as far as I know, it's a FWD only engine. Besides, the DI 3.6 makes more power (though mine sounds better ), so why would you want an LS4? A 400hp 5.3 would be fun, but I suspect that's not what it's going to be.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #6  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Gen Vs will either debut in a Cadillac truck or the Corvette.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #7  
FiefSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 873
From: Chicago Burbs
That would be cool.. probably won't happen out of the gate. But I'd have no problem driving a 400hp 5.3l Camaro if it got a few more mpg's...
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
Primus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 395
From: St. Peters, MO
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
When he said, "already done", I think he was referring to the motor being already done on other GM cars.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #9  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by CLEAN
He could be talking about the LS4, which I have in the Impala, but as far as I know, it's a FWD only engine. Besides, the DI 3.6 makes more power (though mine sounds better ), so why would you want an LS4? A 400hp 5.3 would be fun, but I suspect that's not what it's going to be.
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by skorpion317
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
I know, that's why I said as far as I know, it was a FWD engine only.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by CLEAN
I know, that's why I said as far as I know, it was a FWD engine only.
It would be possible to put the LS4 into a RWD application if a new intake manifold were made.

However, I don't think there's any point to putting the LS4 into the Camaro.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #12  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
you have zero credible sources.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #13  
Mjolnir's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by skorpion317
It would be possible to put the LS4 into a RWD application if a new intake manifold were made.

However, I don't think there's any point to putting the LS4 into the Camaro.
The LS4 has the horsepower, but does it have the torque to move a Camaro?

You're looking at ~1000 pounds difference.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #14  
Grape Ape's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by skorpion317
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
Which would be ideal for a functional cowl induction hood
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #15  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by Mjolnir
The LS4 has the horsepower, but does it have the torque to move a Camaro?

You're looking at ~1000 pounds difference.
323lb/ft for the LS4, 276lb/ft for the 3.6 DI V6.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.