2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

5.3 V8 DI 400HP as the BASE V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
2001Firehawk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 284
From: Pa
5.3 V8 DI 400HP as the BASE V8

Got to thinking about Scott saying that we're in for some big surprises.

The biggest surprise I believe, will be what the BASE V8 will be.

From the get-go, I believed that the Camaro, was going to be the showcase vehicle, for the next generation of V8 engines.

The design goal will probaby be a BASE V8 with 100HP more, than the BASE V6.

With a 2.0L 260HP I4 , & a 3.6L 304HP V6 already done.
The time for the DI V8 is here now.

With everyone knowing that it won't be the LS2 , & thinking that it will be the LS3, I think that we'll be in for a nice surprise...
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #2  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by 2001Firehawk
Got to thinking about Scott saying that we're in for some big surprises.

The biggest surprise I believe, will be what the BASE V8 will be.

From the get-go, I believed that the Camaro, was going to be the showcase vehicle, for the next generation of V8 engines.

The design goal will probaby be a BASE V8 with 100HP more, than the BASE V6.

With a 2.0L 260HP I4 , & a 3.6L 304HP V6 already done.
The time for the DI V8 is here now.

With everyone knowing that it won't be the LS2 , & thinking that it will be the LS3, I think that we'll be in for a nice surprise...
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
SManZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
From: Manassas, VA
I don't know much about the 5.3 motor...what would its advantages be? Is it DOD capable? DI would provide better mileage - do you expect mileage figures to be better than with LS3?

Just curious and want to learn more
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #4  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by SManZ
I don't know much about the 5.3 motor...what would its advantages be? Is it DOD capable? DI would provide better mileage - do you expect mileage figures to be better than with LS3?

Just curious and want to learn more
Unless GM is developing a new RWD 5.3L V8, the only 5.3L V8s in the lineup right now are the Vortec truck engines. They put out between 315-320 HP and 340 lb.ft. of torque.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #5  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Unless GM is developing a new RWD 5.3L V8, the only 5.3L V8s in the lineup right now are the Vortec truck engines. They put out between 315-320 HP and 340 lb.ft. of torque.
He could be talking about the LS4, which I have in the Impala, but as far as I know, it's a FWD only engine. Besides, the DI 3.6 makes more power (though mine sounds better ), so why would you want an LS4? A 400hp 5.3 would be fun, but I suspect that's not what it's going to be.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #6  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Gen Vs will either debut in a Cadillac truck or the Corvette.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #7  
FiefSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 873
From: Chicago Burbs
That would be cool.. probably won't happen out of the gate. But I'd have no problem driving a 400hp 5.3l Camaro if it got a few more mpg's...
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
Primus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 395
From: St. Peters, MO
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
When he said, "already done", I think he was referring to the motor being already done on other GM cars.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #9  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by CLEAN
He could be talking about the LS4, which I have in the Impala, but as far as I know, it's a FWD only engine. Besides, the DI 3.6 makes more power (though mine sounds better ), so why would you want an LS4? A 400hp 5.3 would be fun, but I suspect that's not what it's going to be.
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by skorpion317
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
I know, that's why I said as far as I know, it was a FWD engine only.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by CLEAN
I know, that's why I said as far as I know, it was a FWD engine only.
It would be possible to put the LS4 into a RWD application if a new intake manifold were made.

However, I don't think there's any point to putting the LS4 into the Camaro.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #12  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by skorpion317
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
you have zero credible sources.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #13  
Mjolnir's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by skorpion317
It would be possible to put the LS4 into a RWD application if a new intake manifold were made.

However, I don't think there's any point to putting the LS4 into the Camaro.
The LS4 has the horsepower, but does it have the torque to move a Camaro?

You're looking at ~1000 pounds difference.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #14  
Grape Ape's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by skorpion317
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
Which would be ideal for a functional cowl induction hood
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #15  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by Mjolnir
The LS4 has the horsepower, but does it have the torque to move a Camaro?

You're looking at ~1000 pounds difference.
323lb/ft for the LS4, 276lb/ft for the 3.6 DI V6.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.