2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

V8 Camaro to be more expensive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #16  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by georgejetson
Is it? Or is it going to have 362 hp from an L76, at least in the Mustang-GT-equivalent mass-market trim line?
That's my line of thought, but so many seem to think it's going to be the LS3. Honestly, I don't care, whichever is cheaper.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #17  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by georgejetson
Is it? Or is it going to have 362 hp from an L76, at least in the Mustang-GT-equivalent mass-market trim line?
Is the Camaro going to get 3 V8's? LS8, LS3, L76? If one engine has to go I'd rather it be the L76. And now there is talk of a Turbo V6 and hybrid for the Camaro. So thats a 4th V8 setup and a 400HP TT V6.

Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
That's my line of thought, but so many seem to think it's going to be the LS3. Honestly, I don't care, whichever is cheaper.
How much more can an LS3 cost to build anyone have create prices?
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #18  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Jim the Nomad
Hasn't the v8 model generally always been more expensive than the v6 model? On basically every vehicle that ever offered a v6 and a v8?

I'm confused.
Yep. V8 Camaros have always been the pricey ones. Plus - Camaro has been off the market for 8 years. Eight years in which new car prices have naturally followed inflation. I priced a new Mustang GT Premium coupe at edmunds.com, pretty loaded with nav, Shaker stereo, chrome wheels, etc.. MSRP $38,500
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #19  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Camaro has been off the market for 8 years. Eight years in which new car prices have naturally followed inflation. I priced a new Mustang GT Premium coupe at edmunds.com, pretty loaded with nav, Shaker stereo, chrome wheels, etc.. MSRP $38,500
$29,000 in 2002 is $35,666 in 2009 assuming the price goes up 3% every year. $25,000 2002 would be $30,746 in 2009 with that same 3%

So if those were the base prices for the Z28 and SS today we should expect $30,000 for the L76 and $35,000 for the LS3. Don't forget a 2010 Camaro would have more base options and things like bigger rims, brakes, etc...

Last edited by Z28x; Feb 5, 2008 at 09:40 AM.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #20  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
The difference now, is that I don't believe GM will make the marketing decision to 'push' the V8 cars.

Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.

What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.

So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.

Last edited by Z284ever; Feb 5, 2008 at 09:57 AM.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #21  
twocamaros's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 88
hmm i would hope around 30 highway mpg.. considerin the 6spd 4thgens were rated at 27 or 28 depending on the year.. it better not be 25.. cause that would be pathetic..
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #22  
94Camaro_Z_28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 888
From: La Porte City, Iowa
I haven't been seeing a whole lot of good news lately. 70's all over again with regulations killing the HP wars. I never expected the V8 to come in at 25, and have been planning for a 38-40k Camaro for the last year so this isn't much of a shock.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #23  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by twocamaros
hmm i would hope around 30 highway mpg.. considerin the 6spd 4thgens were rated at 27 or 28 depending on the year.. it better not be 25.. cause that would be pathetic..
The revised EPA estimates on the car you speak of is 17/26. The new camaro will have more HP and you want more fuel economy?

I'm *hoping* the '10 Camaro will get 17/25-ish for the V-8.

Edit:

Hmmmmmmmmm, the new G8 is rated at 15/24...

The G8 V6 is 17/25

Last edited by Silverado C-10; Feb 5, 2008 at 10:36 AM.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #24  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by twocamaros
hmm i would hope around 30 highway mpg.. considerin the 6spd 4thgens were rated at 27 or 28 depending on the year.. it better not be 25.. cause that would be pathetic..
I think 30 on the highway would be nice, but it will take some work with the new EPA ratings. With a 6 speed manual, a 1995 LT1 is 15/24 under the new ratings and a 2002 LS1 is 17/26.

The G8 is rated 15/24 with V8 and 17/25 with V6. The Cadillac CTS with the DI 3.6 is rated at 16/25 for the manual.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #25  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The difference now, is that I don't believe GM will make the marketing decision to 'push' the V8 cars.

Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.

What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.

So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
And with the more limited production and increased premium on the V8, the Camaro is becoming more of a Challenger competitor than Mustang competitor. Perhaps it will be higher volume than Challenger, but this seems like a natural concession given the circumstances.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #26  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The difference now, is that I don't believe GM will make the marketing decision to 'push' the V8 cars.

Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.

What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.

So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
I'm no expert but if the aero work is done correctly and you have a nice automatic with proper 5th and 6th gear selections, I don't really understand how you couldn't get in the upper 20s on the highway.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #27  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
If GM puts a high geared rear end in the car, then yeah, it's probably possible... but it's also a camaro. It's hard to find that balance where the car will have competitive 0-60 times, etc. and still have good fuel economy. I'm sure the camaro could easily be geared for 30mpg highway, but it will be a complete dog and uncompetitive (the same could probably even be said for the *boring* passenger cars, but no one wants to give up the performance numbers and look slow or "weak" when compared to competitors). On the other end of the spectrum, GM could say screw fuel mileage and drop a low rear in the car and have *lower* 0-60 and 1/4 miles times.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #28  
Cat Girl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by Jim the Nomad
Hasn't the v8 model generally always been more expensive than the v6 model? On basically every vehicle that ever offered a v6 and a v8?

I'm confused.

You're not alone with that. I assumed the same thing.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #29  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
I'm no expert but if the aero work is done correctly and you have a nice automatic with proper 5th and 6th gear selections, I don't really understand how you couldn't get in the upper 20s on the highway.

You mean as aero as the MUCH lighter Corvette, which gets 16/26?
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #30  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by 94Camaro_Z_28
I haven't been seeing a whole lot of good news lately. 70's all over again with regulations killing the HP wars. I never expected the V8 to come in at 25, and have been planning for a 38-40k Camaro for the last year so this isn't much of a shock.
Horsepower wars took a nosedive when insurence started slapping surcharges on the around 1970, and the bulk of the public (the large post-WWII babies) outgrew "youth-oriented" vehicles and wanted more luxury.

They moved out of GTOs, Chevelle SSs, and Road Runners into Grand Prixs, Monte Carlos, and Cordobas. All which saw a sales explosion even before Fed-Regs kicked in during the 70s.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.