V8 Camaro to be more expensive?
anyone have create prices?
So if those were the base prices for the Z28 and SS today we should expect $30,000 for the L76 and $35,000 for the LS3. Don't forget a 2010 Camaro would have more base options and things like bigger rims, brakes, etc...
Last edited by Z28x; Feb 5, 2008 at 09:40 AM.
The difference now, is that I don't believe GM will make the marketing decision to 'push' the V8 cars.
Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.
What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.
So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.
What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.
So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
Last edited by Z284ever; Feb 5, 2008 at 09:57 AM.
I haven't been seeing a whole lot of good news lately. 70's all over again with regulations killing the HP wars. I never expected the V8 to come in at 25, and have been planning for a 38-40k Camaro for the last year so this isn't much of a shock.
I'm *hoping* the '10 Camaro will get 17/25-ish for the V-8.
Edit:
Hmmmmmmmmm, the new G8 is rated at 15/24...
The G8 V6 is 17/25
Last edited by Silverado C-10; Feb 5, 2008 at 10:36 AM.
The G8 is rated 15/24 with V8 and 17/25 with V6. The Cadillac CTS with the DI 3.6 is rated at 16/25 for the manual.
The difference now, is that I don't believe GM will make the marketing decision to 'push' the V8 cars.
Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.
What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.
So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.
What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.
So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
The difference now, is that I don't believe GM will make the marketing decision to 'push' the V8 cars.
Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.
What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.
So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
Previously, the V6 cars were loss leaders - now they'll be the main event.
What will the V8's highway mpg be rated at? 24 mpg? 25mpg?
What if by '10/'11 GM needs a corporate average of 29 or 30? Heck, I don't even think the V6's will get that.
So in this scenario, Camaro will not aid GM in it's CAFE efforts. I think it only makes sense for GM to try and limit Camaro's adverse effects on the corporate average. It would be foolhardy not to.
If GM puts a high geared rear end in the car, then yeah, it's probably possible... but it's also a camaro. It's hard to find that balance where the car will have competitive 0-60 times, etc. and still have good fuel economy. I'm sure the camaro could easily be geared for 30mpg highway, but it will be a complete dog and uncompetitive (the same could probably even be said for the *boring* passenger cars, but no one wants to give up the performance numbers and look slow or "weak" when compared to competitors). On the other end of the spectrum, GM could say screw fuel mileage and drop a low rear in the car and have *lower* 0-60 and 1/4 miles times.
They moved out of GTOs, Chevelle SSs, and Road Runners into Grand Prixs, Monte Carlos, and Cordobas. All which saw a sales explosion even before Fed-Regs kicked in during the 70s.


