For those of you planning on buying the V8..
anyone really read the milage ratings on the stickers? V6 cars MIGHT get 1 mpg more than the V8 counterpart in a particular model. I really don't see this as a valid point to a real car enthusiest. The big difference between the Camaro V8 and V6 will be insurance to cover each, and the fact that you have to pay for PREMIUM gas for the V8 as opposed to the "cheap" stuff for the V6. That being said, I will gladly buy the V8 ONLY. I'm used to V8's and won't settle for less unless they offer a wicked fast V6 Turbo that would actually be faster than the V8. (ala Grand National). But I don't see that happening.
My 95 Z/28 is now my "second" car. (My 02 Tahoe is my "daily driver".) I have only ever filled it with premium unleaded. I filled it this Saturday and it cost me $3.739/gal. By this summer I expect premium to be north of $4/gal. I will still continue to fill it.
FWIW, I currently own 4 vehicles. All four are Chevy V8s.
FWIW, I currently own 4 vehicles. All four are Chevy V8s.
For those of you buying V8's....
Nah, this is a non-issue. One: Because GM's V8's get amazing mileage. Two: they get that mileage with insane power numbers (relative to mileage), and Three: I want a V8.
Really is as simple as that for me, gas or no gas; which brings me to my next point. I won't be buying a V8 Camaro unless said V8 can run on E85. (base V8).......bound to happen, it's just a matter of 'when'. If it's from launch...Wonderful!!! If I have to wait a few years, so be it.
Nah, this is a non-issue. One: Because GM's V8's get amazing mileage. Two: they get that mileage with insane power numbers (relative to mileage), and Three: I want a V8.
Really is as simple as that for me, gas or no gas; which brings me to my next point. I won't be buying a V8 Camaro unless said V8 can run on E85. (base V8).......bound to happen, it's just a matter of 'when'. If it's from launch...Wonderful!!! If I have to wait a few years, so be it.
For those of you buying V8's....
Nah, this is a non-issue. One: Because GM's V8's get amazing mileage. Two: they get that mileage with insane power numbers (relative to mileage), and Three: I want a V8.
Really is as simple as that for me, gas or no gas; which brings me to my next point. I won't be buying a V8 Camaro unless said V8 can run on E85. (base V8).......bound to happen, it's just a matter of 'when'. If it's from launch...Wonderful!!! If I have to wait a few years, so be it.
Nah, this is a non-issue. One: Because GM's V8's get amazing mileage. Two: they get that mileage with insane power numbers (relative to mileage), and Three: I want a V8.
Really is as simple as that for me, gas or no gas; which brings me to my next point. I won't be buying a V8 Camaro unless said V8 can run on E85. (base V8).......bound to happen, it's just a matter of 'when'. If it's from launch...Wonderful!!! If I have to wait a few years, so be it.
Even if it doesnt come that way from GM you can easily convert it to E85 later.
E85 is the fuel for the next generation V8s. i am tired of putting my money in the pockets of middle eastern countries. i hope that the government will give aid to the american farmers to grow the corn that we need for the future. e85 will save the v8 performance.
And you're darn right about the V8 fuel of the future thing.
anyone really read the milage ratings on the stickers? V6 cars MIGHT get 1 mpg more than the V8 counterpart in a particular model. I really don't see this as a valid point to a real car enthusiest. The big difference between the Camaro V8 and V6 will be insurance to cover each, and the fact that you have to pay for PREMIUM gas for the V8 as opposed to the "cheap" stuff for the V6. That being said, I will gladly buy the V8 ONLY. I'm used to V8's and won't settle for less unless they offer a wicked fast V6 Turbo that would actually be faster than the V8. (ala Grand National). But I don't see that happening.
Last edited by HAZ-Matt; Mar 9, 2008 at 07:56 PM.
yeah I don't have any complaints, I can eat $6 every week thats life, things get more expensive, not cheaper, and beyond that what would you like me to do about it? not buy gas? theres nothing anyone can do about it, this conversation is stupid, if someone is basing thier decision to buy or not to buy on gas price, they shouldn't be on a camaro "enthusiasts" board
I also think that discussing our concerns on mpg reflects the thoughts from many people, and that in turn may affect how our camaros are built in the future. Our opinions do matter, IMHO.
Last edited by merlinsteele; Mar 8, 2008 at 10:58 AM.
I think many of you have hit on a very important point: GM's V8s get amazing fuel economy for their power. Some people still have it in their minds that V8 = a 12 mpg 1971 Cadillac Fleetwood with the 500 ci 8.2 liter and a 4 bbl carburator.
Modern engine design is nothing short of amzing. I held two camshafts in my hands once - in one hand was the partially missing because it had cracked cast iron camshaft from a late 1970's Chrysler 318. In my other hand was a complete aluminum high performance camshaft for a GM 350 small block. The aluminum cam felt as light as a feather compared to the old iron cam.
My point? ALL the parts of modern engines are lighter. Lighter, tighter tollerances, vast improvments in air and fuel delivery. A modern day V8 is certainly far more efficient than old ones. Add that to transmissions with more gears and cars with better aerodynamics and there should be no reason V8 engines scare anyone fuel wise today.
Modern engine design is nothing short of amzing. I held two camshafts in my hands once - in one hand was the partially missing because it had cracked cast iron camshaft from a late 1970's Chrysler 318. In my other hand was a complete aluminum high performance camshaft for a GM 350 small block. The aluminum cam felt as light as a feather compared to the old iron cam.
My point? ALL the parts of modern engines are lighter. Lighter, tighter tollerances, vast improvments in air and fuel delivery. A modern day V8 is certainly far more efficient than old ones. Add that to transmissions with more gears and cars with better aerodynamics and there should be no reason V8 engines scare anyone fuel wise today.
I think many of you have hit on a very important point: GM's V8s get amazing fuel economy for their power. Some people still have it in their minds that V8 = a 12 mpg 1971 Cadillac Fleetwood with the 500 ci 8.2 liter and a 4 bbl carburator.
Modern engine design is nothing short of amzing. I held two camshafts in my hands once - in one hand was the partially missing because it had cracked cast iron camshaft from a late 1970's Chrysler 318. In my other hand was a complete aluminum high performance camshaft for a GM 350 small block. The aluminum cam felt as light as a feather compared to the old iron cam.
My point? ALL the parts of modern engines are lighter. Lighter, tighter tollerances, vast improvments in air and fuel delivery. A modern day V8 is certainly far more efficient than old ones. Add that to transmissions with more gears and cars with better aerodynamics and there should be no reason V8 engines scare anyone fuel wise today.
Modern engine design is nothing short of amzing. I held two camshafts in my hands once - in one hand was the partially missing because it had cracked cast iron camshaft from a late 1970's Chrysler 318. In my other hand was a complete aluminum high performance camshaft for a GM 350 small block. The aluminum cam felt as light as a feather compared to the old iron cam.
My point? ALL the parts of modern engines are lighter. Lighter, tighter tollerances, vast improvments in air and fuel delivery. A modern day V8 is certainly far more efficient than old ones. Add that to transmissions with more gears and cars with better aerodynamics and there should be no reason V8 engines scare anyone fuel wise today.
Someone get's it.


