possible timeline..forseen ......
Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
Originally Posted by guionM
2007.5?
We are in the 2007 model year already (been since January).
2007 MY ends December 31st. No way on earth you'll see one before then, so perish the thought of ANY 2007, 2007.5,or even a 2007.99 Camaro.
It's going to be mid next year (mid 2008 model year) at the earliest, and I may be dreaming a little on that date.
Best bet, late next year or early '08.
We are in the 2007 model year already (been since January).
2007 MY ends December 31st. No way on earth you'll see one before then, so perish the thought of ANY 2007, 2007.5,or even a 2007.99 Camaro.
It's going to be mid next year (mid 2008 model year) at the earliest, and I may be dreaming a little on that date.
Best bet, late next year or early '08.
Bob
Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I think we're still saying 2008 as a 2009, if I read this correctly (no winkies, so its pretty easy for simple folk like me to do).
Bob
Bob
LOOK BOB NO WINKIE! LOL
Originally Posted by EllwynX
That's how I remember it as well. They came out in '93 as 1993 1/2 cars I believe.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.
Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
Originally Posted by guionM
Not sure when production started, but I can gaurantee they weren't called 93 1/2.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.

Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
Well if the new GMT-900 trucks (Tahoe/Avalanche) can be sold early as a 2007 model during calendar year (CY) 2006, why couldn't GM release a car as a MY 07 during CY 07 regardless of when in 07 it came out?
Shift the MY designation to MY 08 in December or whenever.... when a "full production" version is produced (thinking in terms of the scenario presented by Caps94ZODG.
I understand the "next model year" vehicles are released several months before the CY, but who sets that in stone? I never really understood that to begin with
. If it is an MY 07, then release it January 1st of 2007 for petes-sake! I digress....
Would be nice to finally see a worth-while Anniversary edition car- something special vice candy-coating. Would be better seeing it as the Indy or Daytona
pace car to boot!
Shift the MY designation to MY 08 in December or whenever.... when a "full production" version is produced (thinking in terms of the scenario presented by Caps94ZODG.
I understand the "next model year" vehicles are released several months before the CY, but who sets that in stone? I never really understood that to begin with
. If it is an MY 07, then release it January 1st of 2007 for petes-sake! I digress....Would be nice to finally see a worth-while Anniversary edition car- something special vice candy-coating. Would be better seeing it as the Indy or Daytona
pace car to boot!
Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
Originally Posted by guionM
Not sure when production started, but I can gaurantee they weren't called 93 1/2.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.

so they were not "just" early 65s
Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
Originally Posted by guionM
Not sure when production started, but I can gaurantee they weren't called 93 1/2.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.
Even the '64 1/2 Mustang was actually a '65 (Ford never called it a 64 1/2).
If Camaro began production (even if it was just pilot cars) in '92, then the whole run is classified '93. If it was '93, then they were '94s even though Chevy may have marketed them as '93s.

Re: possible timeline..forseen ......
My bet is on an early 2008 release as a 2009 model. Remember the GMT-900's? Came out Jan. 1 2006 as the first 2007 model.
Also, I can't see GM rushing to come up with an "anniversary" model. GM tried this with the GTO (the 2004 for the 40th anniversary), but styling concerns and public knowledge that the 05's would have hood scoops and a 400 hp motor were two of many reasons why the '04's lingered on lots. Best to spend whatever time is needed to make the product right...
Also, I can't see GM rushing to come up with an "anniversary" model. GM tried this with the GTO (the 2004 for the 40th anniversary), but styling concerns and public knowledge that the 05's would have hood scoops and a 400 hp motor were two of many reasons why the '04's lingered on lots. Best to spend whatever time is needed to make the product right...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



