2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: GM Reportedly Calls "Game On" For Supercharged 550HP Camaro Z/28

Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #106  
95redLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by speeding2fast2c
That's my point, we don't know, and Z284ever is putting it out there that this Z/28 is going to be a prime heavy weight. What people should do is not state something and try and pass it as fact when they don't even have a clue!!
I figure the 4100 (give or take 50 lbs) is a pretty accurate number...considering the current weight (3880)+ the added weight of the blower etc...It'll still be lighter than a Challenger!

Z284ever is usually a pretty accurate source...at least w/Camaro info
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #107  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
if they could have only made up their damn mind about this car a year ago, i would not have ordered the ss. i would have got the z28 for sure. it would have been well worth waiting for. damn!
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #108  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
A note on price. For those of you who think this is going to be a 50k car, I think you're shooting high. Here's why:

A Cadillac CTS 3.6DI has an MSRP of $38,860.
A Cadillac CTS-V has an MSRP of $58,875.

That's a difference of $20,015 to swap out the 3.6DI for the LSA, plus all of the requisite drivetrain changes, brake, wheel, and tire upgrades -- everything.

Starting with a 1LT (MSRP $23,880) and adding $20,015 brings us to $43,895.
Starting with a 2LT (MSRP $26,875) and adding $20,015 brings us to $46,890.

Based on those figures, I think it's reasonable to assume that the Z28 w/ LSA will have a base MSRP right around 45k (undercutting base Corvette by a few grand). Of course, if you check every option on the list, you'll be able to get over 50k, but that doesn't mean it's fair to call it a 50k car.


And a note on weight: I have heard repeatedly that Camaro's Zeta II architecture is one of the sturdiest automotive structures ever built. For that reason, I'm guessing that Camaro DIV6 -> Camaro LSA will be a smaller weight gain than CTS DIV6 -> CTS LSA, because Zeta won't need as much additional bracing as Sigma did. This is just a guess, and I don't think it's going to make more than 50 pounds difference, but just something to note.


Finally, a note about the name. Whoever said that you can't call it ZL1 because it doesn't have an aluminum big block is being foolish. LS3, L99, and LSA are all aluminum. You're seriously going to claim requirements about the physical size of the block as a good reason to rule out a name? Did the ZL1 (which was never sold as a production car) have performance or power output numbers even remotely close to what the current SS has (let alone what this Z28 will have)?
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #109  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by JakeRobb

Finally, a note about the name. Whoever said that you can't call it ZL1 because it doesn't have an aluminum big block is being foolish. LS3, L99, and LSA are all aluminum. You're seriously going to claim requirements about the physical size of the block as a good reason to rule out a name? Did the ZL1 (which was never sold as a production car) have performance or power output numbers even remotely close to what the current SS has (let alone what this Z28 will have)?
There's alot that is rediculous in this thread. I would pay insane money for the ability to watch Z284Ever pull up next to a 2011 Z28 in his 1983 Cross-Fire injected 305-powered Z28 shaking his fist telling the 2011 owner how much of a disgrace his car is to the Camaro heritage.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #110  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
CTS-V is ~4250lbs. and it is the fastest sedan ever on the ring. 1/4 mi. in 12.0.

a 4100lbs. Camaro will still do high 11's and be the best handling Camaro ever. Faster and cheaper than a C6.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #111  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
Super83Z, Z284ever is allowed to have his opinion of this car, and the Camaro in general, just as much as you are.............. maybe more. Especially considering the time and effort he has taken, with regards to communication with GM and the Camaro team.

You not agreeing with him, is your perogative. It does not, however, make his point any more or less valid.

I, like others, agree with him. The idea of a lightweight, tossable, razor handling Z28, is very appealing............. even if I am not thrilled with the new Camaro's packaging. It would make me cross shop the Camaro, with the Mustang, again............... like I did in 1991.

Having the "its great" crowd, using the 2007-2009 GT500, as an excuse for this car being fabulous, is ridiculous. Especially considering the comments that have come out of this very forum, about the GT500. It was a nose heavy pig of a car, with huge horsepower, and nothing else................ until the new Camaro came out. Then it was a too nose heavy, straightline only, overpriced beast. Now, with a new Z28 set to come out, in a year, this is a great car to benchmark.

The 2010 GT500 corrected many of the problems with the 2007-2009, and the 2011 will address the most glaring........... being weight and weight distribution. So, how many years will it take for GM to do the same with the "new" Z28.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #112  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
I nominate Doug for president of the... ummm... world.

Originally Posted by SSbaby
Ohhh, these amateur would be racers!
You've been asked once with no response so I'll ask again.... WTF do you do with your car on the weekends?

I realize this is probably alien to you but some of us actually back our talk with competition.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #113  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
Super83Z, Z284ever is allowed to have his opinion of this car, and the Camaro in general, just as much as you are.............. maybe more. Especially considering the time and effort he has taken, with regards to communication with GM and the Camaro team.

You not agreeing with him, is your perogative. It does not, however, make his point any more or less valid.

I, like others, agree with him. The idea of a lightweight, tossable, razor handling Z28, is very appealing............. even if I am not thrilled with the new Camaro's packaging. It would make me cross shop the Camaro, with the Mustang, again............... like I did in 1991.

Having the "its great" crowd, using the 2007-2009 GT500, as an excuse for this car being fabulous, is ridiculous. Especially considering the comments that have come out of this very forum, about the GT500. It was a nose heavy pig of a car, with huge horsepower, and nothing else................ until the new Camaro came out. Then it was a too nose heavy, straightline only, overpriced beast. Now, with a new Z28 set to come out, in a year, this is a great car to benchmark.

The 2010 GT500 corrected many of the problems with the 2007-2009, and the 2011 will address the most glaring........... being weight and weight distribution. So, how many years will it take for GM to do the same with the "new" Z28.
Tell me of the number of times you have actually cross-shopped the Camaro with the Mustang, how many times did the Mustang win? Just because in the last 6 months you have scaled back your Camaro/GM bashing doesn't erase the years that you did it for. I would be willing to bet that if GM made a 3200lb 600hp Z28 that pulled 1.05 G's on the skidpad you would still find some way to tell me how Ford did something better on the Mustang.

The problem isn't his opinion or your own. Its the fact that its the same drivel that gets plastered on EVERY thread. We get it you don't like it, wonderful, can you all just go to the corral now?
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #114  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by super83Z
We can only hope this will turn into you no longer jumping into every thread crying how this makes it not a Camaro or that makes it not a Z28. Your "hallowed" Z28 name has been tarnished far worse than being the fastest regular production Camaro ever produced. Let's wait and see what the Camaro team churns out, you were even impressed by the SS car.
Yeah, and end you stalking me, weirdo...
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #115  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yeah, and end you stalking me, weirdo...
Actually I came to this section to get away from the constant b!tching of the 5th in the future vehicle section, then BAM! Here you, Lightninggal and whoever else are here to complain about the same stuff in the future section. Sad days when I have to leave this site to find one that doesn't have the people ragging on it outnumber the people defending it.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #116  
ZZMike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by Chevycobb
hmmm...wonder if it would be good enough for me to sell my Z

I am thinking the same thing. When I found out the Z/28 was not going to be offered, I bought a Z06. This car could be enough for me to return to my pony car roots.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #117  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
In before the lock!

It would be amusing to go back to 2006-2007 and read all the posts about what a disgusting, embarrassing pig the GT500 is when it first came out. Maybe I'll do that later for my own entertainment.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #118  
95redLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Distinguishing features will be a unique bodykit, a slightly raised hood to accommodate the supercharger and intercooler assembly, a new rear spoiler, and custom wheels.

Under the hood is likely to be the Cadillac CTS-V’s supercharged 6.2-liter LSA V-8, complete with six-speed manual (or optional automatic) and 556 horsepower output. In the 4,300lb CTS-V, this combination is good for a 0-60 mph sprint of just 4.1 seconds and a 12.3 second quarter mile time. Factor in the Camaro’s 200 to 300lb lighter kerb weight and the Z28 would likely be completing the 0-60 mph benchmark in less than four seconds and passing the quarter in the very low 12 second bracket.

Combine these performance numbers with the Camaro’s fully independent suspension and stability control, as well as a completely modern chassis based on the Zeta rear-wheel drive architecture, and the modern-day Z28 may be the first Camaro to outgun rival sports cars from Japan and Europe. That is if GM ever builds one.
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...roduction-path
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #119  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Finally, a note about the name. Whoever said that you can't call it ZL1 because it doesn't have an aluminum big block is being foolish. LS3, L99, and LSA are all aluminum. You're seriously going to claim requirements about the physical size of the block as a good reason to rule out a name? Did the ZL1 (which was never sold as a production car) have performance or power output numbers even remotely close to what the current SS has (let alone what this Z28 will have)?
Jake you can say I was being foolish, however I believe we're closer to agreement on this than you may think. You're correct. The ZL1 was never a regular production Camaro, and no Camaro back in the day had the performance numbers today's cars had. Furthermore GM themselves used the ZL1 name on a special edition heritage big block recently. Anyone that thinks GM is going to call the LSA Camaro ZL1 are the ones being foolish. I also suggested they call it SS Supercharged instead.

While I agree that I'd rather have a lighter more aggressive NA Camaro called Z/28, that ship has apparently sailed as GM has already decided to call the LSA Camaro Z/28. Its time to move on people. At least it looks like they're actually going to build the damn thing. Be happy for cripesake.
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 04:00 PM
  #120  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Anyone that thinks GM is going to call the LSA Camaro ZL1 are the ones being foolish. I also suggested they call it SS Supercharged instead.
Just because I think they should doesn't mean I think they will.

Originally Posted by jg95z28
While I agree that I'd rather have a lighter more aggressive NA Camaro called Z/28, that ship has apparently sailed as GM has already decided to call the LSA Camaro Z/28. Its time to move on people. At least it looks like they're actually going to build the damn thing. Be happy for cripesake.
I'm happy!

I hope to buy one of these 4100lb beasts, and then I'm going to do crazy smoky burnouts past Charlie's house until the secret chemicals in the tire smoke drug him into loving the new Camaro.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.