Some of us sure have gotten pissy around here lately.

 

You're right, things have really gone to pot.

 

Lol... I think people are just running out of things to talk about and speculate on. The severe lack of information concerning this car is starting to go to peoples' brains!

I don't think GM has to worry about keeping the buzz alive for the next two years as much as they have to worry about all of the Camaro enthusiests killing one another!

We are all just getting impatient and frusterated becasue we want this car yesterday!

 

For those that have been around here for a few years, this is the "annual" lull in news. We all get testy when GM gets quiet.

 

Wrong about the Z
Wrong about the Vette
Wrong aboute the Mustang.

You are truly an idiot. Get your facts straight before you run your mouth.

 

TRUTH.COM

 

I think this entire conversation was absurd. Where was there ever mention of 4"? Wasn't that only postulated in someone's post, or did I miss the part where Ed said it would?

What I find more bizarre, is that the original poster made this post due to a concern that HE created on another forum?!?!

That, to me, is like painting my house purple..then telling other people that I'm really concerned about having a purple house. WTF is going on around here!

 

I think no one called BS because Charlie is pretty much "in the know".

 

According to Lutz, it isn't...so maybe we need better information before going off the proverbial 'deep-end'.

 

The reason we went off the "deep end", is because Guy and myself both found ourselves with specific info that was identical. I only linked to that one thread, but the conversation spread to afew others.

 

I see, well, I guess this is the price we all pay when some have info, expound on their concerns, but don't share specifics.

 

The car is very very close to the concept. Im not going into any other details past what I know from a good source, and im not just bs'ing anyone. The concept has been placed next to the production version and simply put when shown to a group of GM employees not on the design team, these employees had a very difficult time trying to figure out which was which, besides of the obvious door handles and mirrors. I will be buying it no matter what. The fact is it is a 2 plus 2 MUSCLE car or is it a Pony car? NOT A SPORTS CAR. When it comes out it'll be perfect size wise. Muscle cars were actually large in size in the sixties/early seventies for the most part. Chevelle, Road runner, Nova etc, Charger etc... so i really dont understand why the new generation of muscle cars as most people are calling them -Mustang/Challenger and Camaro have to conform to sports car status size wise? If you want a light, nimble twisty conquering car get a 350Z or better yet a Corvette.

 

Where does one go if he wants a middleweight, nimble, twisty-conquering car with a hot V8, 2 doors and 4 seats?

 

umm, it IS a sports car! thats what a Pony car is... Camaro's and Mustangs and Challenger were not large in size at all. They were considered compact for the day. It was called HUGGER orange for a reason, and likewise with Challenger's GRABBER orange and GRABBER yellow... Thank you.

hopefully here... other wise it will be a huge disapointment. Im not worried

 

What is "perfect"? Are we using your definition, my definition, or someone else's definition?

See comment about Yugo and Camaro badge.

Bob