2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

If the Camaro is such poop at the track....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #136  
vonmoldy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 433
Mine does alright...in Forza 3
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #137  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
Car tweaking rule of thumb for racers:

Always first start working on the end of the car that is causing the problem.
When you run out of adjustment options at that end, then you can work on the other end.
In this case, I disagree. If we started on the front on the Camaro, we would likely got to a smaller bar to correct the understeer (unless it is a contact patch issue as you stated) and would sacrifice roll stiffness in an already compliant car. That is not the direction I would want to go personally. Thus, I would start with the rear bar in this case.
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #138  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
I think you missed my point (and it may be that I wasn't clear....)

You plan for two versions -- one for the mainstream -- and one (a track package) for the guy or gal what wants to take it to the track........

.........and then the world comes apart -- and something's gotta give.

There was simply no time to go back and 'redo' the suspension..........

The opera ain't over..........
Thank you for the response Scott. I'm waiting for the fat lady to sing I guess! But I am certainly VERY optimistic based on what I have seen from the CTS-V.

I just hope that Track Package comes in time to steal some of the Mustangs thunder!
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 06:07 PM
  #139  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
138 replies to a time sheet where the car is 4 seconds behind the $58,000 M3.

Heck, it's considerably ahead of the track pack Mustang. How much is a bare bones track pack? 30K?
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #140  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
Sammy hollow bar, right? About the same stiffness as my solid GM 21mm. We have basically the same bar setup.

I'll try to refrain from any further hijacking.
Heh, yes it is in fact the Strano bar. It saves a whole 5 lbs allegedly. Too bad I lost more than that with the Watts.

Originally Posted by ZZtop
In this case, I disagree. If we started on the front on the Camaro, we would likely got to a smaller bar to correct the understeer (unless it is a contact patch issue as you stated) and would sacrifice roll stiffness in an already compliant car. That is not the direction I would want to go personally. Thus, I would start with the rear bar in this case.
Yeah I dunno. I don't think we would just change one thing at a time, but if we had to perhaps the rear bar... I can't really speculate too much since I haven't driven one myself though. But it would be smarter to do something like shocks + bars, especially if the shocks on the 5th Gen are anything like on a 4th Gen (ie terrible).
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #141  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by graham
138 replies to a time sheet where the car is 4 seconds behind the $58,000 M3.

Heck, it's considerably ahead of the track pack Mustang. How much is a bare bones track pack? 30K?
How much ahead of a non-TP Mustang would the SS be?

Or

How much closer to the M3 would a TP Camaro be?
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 08:09 AM
  #142  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by graham
138 replies to a time sheet where the car is 4 seconds behind the $58,000 M3.

Heck, it's considerably ahead of the track pack Mustang. How much is a bare bones track pack? 30K?
I am pretty sure you have to buy a GT Premium inorder to get the Track Pack. I did the numbers quite a while ago when the 2010 GT and Camaro came out and I think the two (GT Track Pack and Camaro SS) are almost identical in price at around $34-35k.

For those who do not need or want leather, the 1SS looks to be the best performance bang for the buck still, seeing as the 2011 GT Track Pack will require one to start with GT Premium. I still haven't confirmed if the Brembo's will be part of the Track Pack or an entirely separate option where the Track Pack just features upgraded pads on the standard GT calipers like it did in 2010.
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #143  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
You plan for two versions -- one for the mainstream -- and one (a track package) for the guy or gal what wants to take it to the track........

.........and then the world comes apart -- and something's gotta give.

There was simply no time to go back and 'redo' the suspension..........

The opera ain't over..........
Then I suppose we can assume that a "potential" LSA Camaro {cough... Z/28...cough} could be more than "just" a supercharger.

Last edited by jg95z28; Jan 11, 2010 at 10:34 AM.
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #144  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Then I suppose we can assume that a "potential" LSA Camaro {cough... Z/28...cough} could be more than "just" a supercharger.
That would be great, but for those of us who don't want or can't afford a Z28, there is no reason the regular SS can't handle better. And for that matter, no reason it can't have a performance package that takes it to another level similar to the Track Pack on the Mustang GT.
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 05:44 PM
  #145  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by ZZtop
That would be great, but for those of us who don't want or can't afford a Z28, there is no reason the regular SS can't handle better. And for that matter, no reason it can't have a performance package that takes it to another level similar to the Track Pack on the Mustang GT.
I would expect the equivalent of the 1LE at some point.

The "Mustang is more fun on a track" results in magazine tests can be distilled down to the Mustang offering a Track Pack and the Camaro not offering one ... yet.

Take a look at other comparisons with BMW, etc., where the magazine happens to get some cars with and some without sport packages. The one without usually suffers.
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 08:52 AM
  #146  
jcamere94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,512
From: Miami, FL, US
Originally Posted by Fbodfather

The opera ain't over..........
'til the sissy mustang screams
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 09:30 AM
  #147  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by teal98
I would expect the equivalent of the 1LE at some point.

The "Mustang is more fun on a track" results in magazine tests can be distilled down to the Mustang offering a Track Pack and the Camaro not offering one ... yet.

Take a look at other comparisons with BMW, etc., where the magazine happens to get some cars with and some without sport packages. The one without usually suffers.
We'll see. I've never driven a Track Pack Mustang, but the standard one "feels" alot better to me than the Camaro SS. Lap times are important, but what Camaro needs most IMHO, is much improved "feel".

Start with more direct and communicative steering. If you can't fix that, don't even bother going any further.

Any Camaro - from base to performance - should feel alert and involving, NOT lethargic and lifeless.

If you can't fix that stuff, I really don't care how much extra power you add....
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 11:43 AM
  #148  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by ZZtop
That would be great, but for those of us who don't want or can't afford a Z28, there is no reason the regular SS can't handle better. And for that matter, no reason it can't have a performance package that takes it to another level similar to the Track Pack on the Mustang GT.
Originally Posted by teal98
I would expect the equivalent of the 1LE at some point.

The "Mustang is more fun on a track" results in magazine tests can be distilled down to the Mustang offering a Track Pack and the Camaro not offering one ... yet.
I guess more than anything else, I'd like to see GM offer their own "track pack" that can be added to either the base 1SS or 2SS, rather than offer a "track"/1LE stripper car. Sure they can offer it standard on the LSA Camaro, but it should at least also be optional on Camaro SS. Those that want a boulevard cruiser simply need not order the option.
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #149  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I guess more than anything else, I'd like to see GM offer their own "track pack" that can be added to either the base 1SS or 2SS, rather than offer a "track"/1LE stripper car. Sure they can offer it standard on the LSA Camaro, but it should at least also be optional on Camaro SS. Those that want a boulevard cruiser simply need not order the option.
My personal preference would be to not have an add on "Track Pack" per se, but to simply fix the Camaro's difficiencies across the board. From bottom to top. I'm not sure if that's even possible, but that's what I'd like to see. Beyond that obviously, I'd like to see a more focused niche performance package. Something comprehensive, called Z/28.

Of course, GM first needs to stop it's obsession with the 2005 GT500 and deliver the Z/28 which they not only promised us at the Heritage Center in Detroit 4 years ago - but the one everyone wants. Again, I don't know if that's even possible.....

Last edited by Z284ever; Jan 12, 2010 at 01:32 PM.
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #150  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Z284ever
My personal preference would be to not have an add on "Track Pack" per se, but to simply fix the Camaro's difficiencies across the board. From bottom to top. I'm not sure if that's even possible, but that's what I'd like to see. Beyond that obviously, I'd like to see a more focused niche performance package. Something comprehensive, called Z/28.

Of course, GM first needs to stop it's obsession with the 2005 GT500 and deliver the Z/28 which they not only promised us at the Heritage Center in Detroit 4 years ago - but the one everyone wants. Again, I don't know if that's even possible.....
A shock/sway bar revision for the second year would not be unusual for GM. Not sure what their options are for an easy steering fix. You are going to have to live with the interior and blind spots.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.