2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

If the Camaro is such poop at the track....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
If the Camaro is such poop at the track....

How do you explain this?


I thought I'd post Car and Driver's Lightning lap results for those who don't have the magazine.

Location - Virginia International Raceway
Grand West Course - "We chose the Grand West Course for its mix of straights, slow and high speed corners, uphill, esses, and 4.1 mile length."

Overall results.

1. Corvette ZR1, (2:51.8)
2. KTM X - Bow, (2:52.3)
3. Lamborghine LP670, (2:53.9)
4. Ariel Atom 3 (2:57.6)
5. Corvette Grand Sport (2:58.8)
6. Audi R8 (2:59.5)
7. Lotus Exiqe S 260 (3:05.0)
8. BMW M3 (3:05.4)
9. Porsche Cayman S (3:05.8)
10. Porsche Carrera S (3:05.8)
11. Jaguar XKR (3:06.4)
12. Ford Shelby GT500 (3:07.4)
13. Audi TTS (3:08.4)
14. Camaro SS (3:09.5)
15. Audi S4 (3:10.8)
16. Nissan Nismo 370z (3:12.0)
17. Ford Mustang GT (3:13.3)
18. Genesis Coupe 3.8 (3:14.8)
19. Mazdaspeed 3 (316:2)
20. Subaru WRX (3:16.6)
21. Mini Cooper Works (3:17.1)
22. Volkswagen GTI (3:19.3)
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=58802
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 11:54 PM
  #2  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Why no CTS-V?
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 01:28 AM
  #3  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Go watch one at an autox and you will see a different story. On a road course the power the Camaro puts down can be used to its advantage but it really gets killed going into the corner. When I saw the new camaro autox it was fast out of the hole, slow into the corner but seemed decent coming out of a corner. It just pushed like a tractor.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 01:32 AM
  #4  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by formula79
How do you explain this?
I love how this is repeatedly brought up in a sarcastic manner by people who actually don't know the answer at all.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 01:56 AM
  #5  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
I love how this is repeatedly brought up in a sarcastic manner by people who actually don't know the answer at all.
What are you talking about. I think the Camaro finished pretty good in that test considering every car that beat it cost more.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 04:25 AM
  #6  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by formula79
How do you explain this?
You drive the car based on its strengths/weaknesses.

If the Camaro's corner attitude is predominantly understeer, you have to brake early and use the IRS's ability to roll (squat) to exit the corner more cleanly while applying the throttle early. Therefore, the improved exit speed out of the corner translates to a higher terminal speed at the end of the straight.

That's the short and curly of it.

If a comparative car is more stiffly sprung, it might be harder to get its power to the ground (i.e. slides more) although it probably feels more controllable (i.e. fun) under throttle. However, just because a car feels more fun or even more neutral in attitude around corners, it doesn't automatically mean its quicker around a circuit .

Of course I relate the last point to the Mustang (Camaro's rival).

End result? The stopwatch doesn't lie even if, subjectively, the quicker car isn't as fun to drive.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 04:49 AM
  #7  
30th_ANNIV_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 133
From: Goldsboro, NC/ Roseville, MN
damn! 17.6 seconds behind the Corvette ZR1 is pritty damn impressive.

Last edited by 30th_ANNIV_Z28; Jan 3, 2010 at 04:54 AM. Reason: misspellings wrds
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 06:05 AM
  #8  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 30th_ANNIV_Z28
damn! 17.6 seconds behind the Corvette ZR1 is pritty damn impressive.
Sarcasm?

The only Lightning Lap contestants that have outrun the ZR1 are the Viper ACR and Mosler MT900. The ZR1 is impressive. Heck, of the top 13 street vehicles tested, 3 are Corvettes.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
30th_ANNIV_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 133
From: Goldsboro, NC/ Roseville, MN
Originally Posted by AdioSS
Sarcasm?
no man thats impressive.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #10  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Anyone see the sad irony here. Now we're looking for evidence that the Camaro is not "poop at the track".

How far we've fallen....
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #11  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Anyone see the sad irony here. Now we're looking for evidence that the Camaro is not "poop at the track".
Yes, it is incredibly ironic considering it is to counterpoint those who were (and still are) continually stating assumption as fact that the Camaro IS "poop at the track". If it were not for that, this would be less of a defensive measure and more of a celebratory one.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
It posts decent times, but as vids show, it just understeers and plows through all the turns. (Why does Chevy insist on tuning Camaro's this way? ref: stock 4th gen)

It has decent grip, but the driving dynamics near the limits seem to be boring. The times are saved by the engine.

Good grip and time #'s do not equate to good handling and driving characteristics. Also, I suspect put in an real race with other cars sharing the track, the Camaro would be put in a further disadvantage because it probably won't be as flexible on taking different lines.

Chevy doesn't need to improve the ultimate grip #'s, they just need to work on the dynamic driving characteristics on the edge. If they can work that magic for the CTSv, I don't see why they can't make the Camaro more exciting.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 03:18 PM
  #13  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Anyone see the sad irony here. Now we're looking for evidence that the Camaro is not "poop at the track".

How far we've fallen....
Most Camaro fans never thought that. We were told early on that it was Nuremberg tuned. Just 5th gen hater propaganda.
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #14  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Originally Posted by JasonD
Yes, it is incredibly ironic considering it is to counterpoint those who were (and still are) continually stating assumption as fact that the Camaro IS "poop at the track". If it were not for that, this would be less of a defensive measure and more of a celebratory one.
I "assume" you've read this test by actual race car drivers and not just those wannabe's who'll 'celebrate' even a flawed performance....the more some of you pat each other on the back for mediocrity, the harder it is to convince GM to fix real problems....

http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...rack_test.html
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #15  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Originally Posted by Z28x
Most Camaro fans never thought that. We were told early on that it was Nuremberg tuned. Just 5th gen hater propaganda.
Oh please. Its not hating at all, its the facts, the car handles like crap. Have you been on the track in the new Camaro yet?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.