have you guys seen this...
have you guys seen this...
review of the Camaro concept car?
what a tool.
If it is a dupe, lock 'er up... I havent been here in for a while.
from
http://www.cars.com/go/features/auto...evrolet_camaro
what a tool.
If it is a dupe, lock 'er up... I havent been here in for a while.
Looks like: Anything but a Camaro
Defining characteristics: Mustang wheel arches, Mustang fastback roofline, mullet-haired driver, Rush CDs
Ridiculous features: The above, because this isn't a Mustang
Chance of being mass-produced: Not bloody likely — unless they start over
Start growing those mullets, boys; the Camaro is back! Sort of. It's actually a concept car and it looks like something — maybe even a bunch of things — with the exception of a Camaro.
Perhaps it's unfair, but everyone's going to compare this retro concept to the Dodge Challenger concept, which was the belle of the 2006 Detroit auto show ball. Dodge picked the definitive Challenger, the 1970 model, and designed its concept after that. Chevrolet started with classic Camaros, such as the 1969 model, and then strayed to the modern-day Corvette and then somehow ended up on the deck of an aircraft carrier, where they claim to have taken some cues from the YF-22, the most advanced fighter jet in the U.S. military.
The result is a Ford Mustang that can travel back in time, track 11 MiG fighters at once and neutralize them — all while remaining nearly invisible to enemy radar. While in development in Lockheed-Martin's super-secret skunkworks, the project was codenamed Chevy Hodgepodge.
But seriously, the Camaro concept is powered by a 400-horsepower version of the Corvette's 6.0-liter LS2 V-8. The transmission has six gears, a stick shift and a clutch pedal — as required by any muscle-car aficionado who doesn't want to get his butt kicked at the drive-in. Chevy estimates that the engine's cylinder-deactivation technology should grant fuel economy of 30 mpg or better. Naturally, the car is rear-wheel drive, with 22-inch wheels wearing gargantuan tires. The front wheels are a none-too-shabby 21 inches in diameter.
To stop this mighty beast, there are four-wheel disc brakes with 14-inch-diameter rotors. If these fail, the driver can always drop the landing hook and snag an arrestor wire to avoid plunging into the sea.
Not surprisingly, Chevrolet describes the car's interior as a cockpit inspired by fighter planes. Plans for an ejector seat were scrapped when an engineer recognized that the car has no sunroof. The two-passenger backseat is described as "occasional seating" for adults — which means you'd be much more comfortable back there if you were the size you were when Camaros were in their heyday.
As for the mullet, so long as it's a concept hairdo, you might be OK. Maybe it will look more like a pompadour mixed with a mohawk, with a hint of inspiration from marmot pelts. Call it a crossover. Who knows how it ultimately would come across — but it probably wouldn't look like a mullet.
Defining characteristics: Mustang wheel arches, Mustang fastback roofline, mullet-haired driver, Rush CDs
Ridiculous features: The above, because this isn't a Mustang
Chance of being mass-produced: Not bloody likely — unless they start over
Start growing those mullets, boys; the Camaro is back! Sort of. It's actually a concept car and it looks like something — maybe even a bunch of things — with the exception of a Camaro.
Perhaps it's unfair, but everyone's going to compare this retro concept to the Dodge Challenger concept, which was the belle of the 2006 Detroit auto show ball. Dodge picked the definitive Challenger, the 1970 model, and designed its concept after that. Chevrolet started with classic Camaros, such as the 1969 model, and then strayed to the modern-day Corvette and then somehow ended up on the deck of an aircraft carrier, where they claim to have taken some cues from the YF-22, the most advanced fighter jet in the U.S. military.
The result is a Ford Mustang that can travel back in time, track 11 MiG fighters at once and neutralize them — all while remaining nearly invisible to enemy radar. While in development in Lockheed-Martin's super-secret skunkworks, the project was codenamed Chevy Hodgepodge.
But seriously, the Camaro concept is powered by a 400-horsepower version of the Corvette's 6.0-liter LS2 V-8. The transmission has six gears, a stick shift and a clutch pedal — as required by any muscle-car aficionado who doesn't want to get his butt kicked at the drive-in. Chevy estimates that the engine's cylinder-deactivation technology should grant fuel economy of 30 mpg or better. Naturally, the car is rear-wheel drive, with 22-inch wheels wearing gargantuan tires. The front wheels are a none-too-shabby 21 inches in diameter.
To stop this mighty beast, there are four-wheel disc brakes with 14-inch-diameter rotors. If these fail, the driver can always drop the landing hook and snag an arrestor wire to avoid plunging into the sea.
Not surprisingly, Chevrolet describes the car's interior as a cockpit inspired by fighter planes. Plans for an ejector seat were scrapped when an engineer recognized that the car has no sunroof. The two-passenger backseat is described as "occasional seating" for adults — which means you'd be much more comfortable back there if you were the size you were when Camaros were in their heyday.
As for the mullet, so long as it's a concept hairdo, you might be OK. Maybe it will look more like a pompadour mixed with a mohawk, with a hint of inspiration from marmot pelts. Call it a crossover. Who knows how it ultimately would come across — but it probably wouldn't look like a mullet.
http://www.cars.com/go/features/auto...evrolet_camaro
Re: have you guys seen this...
Originally Posted by anasazi
alright ya'll, lets dawn our mullets and send this guy hate mail, because you know, THAT'LL SHOW 'EM! *spits chew onto floor*
You don a mullet, dawn is the time of day.
Re: have you guys seen this...
Originally Posted by anasazi
holy crap you mean ... someone doesn't like the new camaro?
hot damn, i do believe the apocalypse is upon us.
(c) 2006 Cingular
hot damn, i do believe the apocalypse is upon us.
(c) 2006 CingularI have no problem with him not liking it... looks are very subjective.
Every thing he criticizes on the Camaro, he heaps praise on the Mustang and Challenger concept for.
You don't think the generalizations that he laid on Camaro owners is a little sophomoric and ridiculous for a "professional" journalist?
Re: have you guys seen this...
Originally Posted by bsmith
I have no problem with him not liking it... looks are very subjective.
Every thing he criticizes on the Camaro, he heaps praise on the Mustang and Challenger concept for.
You don't think the generalizations that he laid on Camaro owners is a little sophomoric and ridiculous for a "professional" journalist?
Every thing he criticizes on the Camaro, he heaps praise on the Mustang and Challenger concept for.
You don't think the generalizations that he laid on Camaro owners is a little sophomoric and ridiculous for a "professional" journalist?
fact is there is a hell of a lot more good press than bad about this car, and ya'll freak out because one quack spouts off his personal views on the subject in less than 500 words. its a crappy article, who cares.
Re: have you guys seen this...
Originally Posted by anasazi
whooptie do?
fact is there is a hell of a lot more good press than bad about this car, and ya'll freak out because one quack spouts off his personal views on the subject in less than 500 words. its a crappy article, who cares.
fact is there is a hell of a lot more good press than bad about this car, and ya'll freak out because one quack spouts off his personal views on the subject in less than 500 words. its a crappy article, who cares.
I think the article was somewhat comical, but mostly sad and pathetic...
Did I suggest the emails to the writer?
I merely posted it because I thought some people here would like to read it.
Re: have you guys seen this...
Originally Posted by bsmith
And where exactly did I freak out?
I think the article was somewhat comical, but mostly sad and pathetic...
Did I suggest the emails to the writer?
I merely posted it because I thought some people here would like to read it.
I think the article was somewhat comical, but mostly sad and pathetic...
Did I suggest the emails to the writer?
I merely posted it because I thought some people here would like to read it.
guarantee if this gets moved into the 5th gen forum then more people will say the same thing Blown350ZZ4 did.
Re: have you guys seen this...
Originally Posted by anasazi
you didn't, Blown350ZZ4 did.
guarantee if this gets moved into the 5th gen forum then more people will say the same thing Blown350ZZ4 did.
guarantee if this gets moved into the 5th gen forum then more people will say the same thing Blown350ZZ4 did.

I haven't been here much in the last couple years...
I posted it here because the Off-Topic areas are usually a lot more fun.
The generation-specific forums are pretty lame on the other forum I am on.
Re: have you guys seen this...
well at least GM still owns it self unlike Chyrsler.
Gm didn't just buy goodmark bodypanels slap it on a new chassie with a new front and rear end, and call it a camaro. hint hint Challenger.
Gm didn't just buy goodmark bodypanels slap it on a new chassie with a new front and rear end, and call it a camaro. hint hint Challenger.


