2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Canadian Car Plant 1 closed due to strike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2007, 12:50 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
95firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton, IL
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by Rampant

Again, this is a much more complicated issue than "unions are a bunch of cry babies who are killing the auto industry" vs. "unions are underpaid and help make everyone better-off."
I think that both parties are right (or wrong in this instance.) I think it is the American culture that has done the most damage. As a society we have gone from a "for the greater good" mindset to "the most money and power to be had in the shortest amount of time regardless of the consequences" mentality.

For an example let's say you have a union employee that produces 5,000 units a day and gets paid $20 or more an hour. With the elitist frame of mind the union worker isn't going to work much harder because he knows that it's going to be extremely difficult for the company to fire him. This is compared to a person in China who produces 10,000 units a day and only makes $5 and hour. As said above the company costs are higher than they rightfully should. Facilities are built overseas, cost cutting measures are applied elsewhere (materials, engineering, R&D.) Not good when the competition can make it just as good if not better for half the price.

Another example is the large corporation who can put another x amount of dollars in their pockets if they implement the schedule that was stated in the post above (something to the effect of a 59 hr work week with 3 nine hour saturdays.) None of that extra profit is going to go into the worker's pockets which in turn will keep morale an experience low. This ultimately leads to an inferior product that won't sell well.

Granted to be as successful as possible is the root of capitalism, why does it have to be at the expense of everyone else? The elitist attitude that we display completely eliminates the balance that makes capitalism successful. IMO if we start thinking about "the greater good" then things can only improve.
95firehawk is offline  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:05 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by 95firehawk
I think that both parties are right (or wrong in this instance.) I think it is the American culture that has done the most damage. As a society we have gone from a "for the greater good" mindset to "the most money and power to be had in the shortest amount of time regardless of the consequences" mentality.

For an example let's say you have a union employee that produces 5,000 units a day and gets paid $20 or more an hour. With the elitist frame of mind the union worker isn't going to work much harder because he knows that it's going to be extremely difficult for the company to fire him. This is compared to a person in China who produces 10,000 units a day and only makes $5 and hour. As said above the company costs are higher than they rightfully should. Facilities are built overseas, cost cutting measures are applied elsewhere (materials, engineering, R&D.) Not good when the competition can make it just as good if not better for half the price.

Another example is the large corporation who can put another x amount of dollars in their pockets if they implement the schedule that was stated in the post above (something to the effect of a 59 hr work week with 3 nine hour saturdays.) None of that extra profit is going to go into the worker's pockets which in turn will keep morale an experience low. This ultimately leads to an inferior product that won't sell well.

Granted to be as successful as possible is the root of capitalism, why does it have to be at the expense of everyone else? The elitist attitude that we display completely eliminates the balance that makes capitalism successful. IMO if we start thinking about "the greater good" then things can only improve.

some very good points. Unions still suck though.
christianjax is offline  
Old 10-04-2007, 02:22 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by christianjax
Unions still suck though.
Speak for yourself!!!
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:20 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
Maybe I am a little fuzzy, but how would a union job make non-union jobs pay more? Job pay (for non-union jobs) is dependent on skills/experience, local living expenses and what the competition is paying for the same type of job. How do the unions factor in?
Higher paying, benefitting Union jobs are factored into the area job curves, not just what the competition pays, for jobs of similar classifications.
90rocz is offline  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:44 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
Originally posted by christianjax:
I blame UAW for toyota's being all over our roads.(at least a major reason) I blame UAW for my 1999 Trans Am being built in Canada instead of America. (and my 2009 Camaro too for that matter) What kills me is that unions can't overlook their greed to see that they are in fact slitting thier own throats.
I blame greedy manufacturers, cutting costs where it hurt their product and designs, clinging to Old: tools/equipment and designs and processes and motors etc to milk as much profit out of them as possible...while the Japanese went on continuosly improving using SPC and other "Demming" philosiphies that domestic corps refused.
90rocz is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 05:24 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by 90rocz
I blame greedy manufacturers, cutting costs where it hurt their product and designs, clinging to Old: tools/equipment and designs and processes and motors etc to milk as much profit out of them as possible...while the Japanese went on continuosly improving using SPC and other "Demming" philosiphies that domestic corps refused.
well when you are paying the union what they extort from you as a company, can you blame them?
christianjax is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 06:21 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Just a question, but have GM (line workers) always been part of a union, I mean since day one?? Thing is, Oshawa (the whole city / surrounding area) thrives on GM. Oshawa would otherwise be nothing without it. GM has ALWAYS been a great place to work (minus the BS), and I don't think "the damn union" has been bending the company over since day one . It just happened that GM is/was the world's largest corporation, and really could afford to pay their employees the wages/benefits that they did. Getting a job there was like "winning the lottery", so to speak. The union didn't have to "fight" for much (at least, I don't believe they did? ) other than to keep things equal and fair for all of the workers. I think we all agree, unions of TODAY serve a different purpose than unions of a few decades ago.

Point being, it is not solely the unions' fault that GM is in the position they're in. MANAGEMENT (when times were good) established the wages, and has also been the one driving the bus, making right turns and wrong turns along the way. While the unions/members DO have some "power" (no doubt) think of it as a government (since it's such a mega-corporation anyway) ... YES it's supposed to be like a "democratic" environment, but really, how often do we the public get to tell the gov't to jump, and they ask "how high"?? Keep in mind, $h!t usually does roll down hill, and unless you actually work on the line, I don't think you'd know the real issues that are NOT "benefits" to working there.
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 08:46 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
Just a question, but have GM (line workers) always been part of a union, I mean since day one?? Thing is, Oshawa (the whole city / surrounding area) thrives on GM. Oshawa would otherwise be nothing without it. GM has ALWAYS been a great place to work (minus the BS), and I don't think "the damn union" has been bending the company over since day one . It just happened that GM is/was the world's largest corporation, and really could afford to pay their employees the wages/benefits that they did. Getting a job there was like "winning the lottery", so to speak. The union didn't have to "fight" for much (at least, I don't believe they did? ) other than to keep things equal and fair for all of the workers. I think we all agree, unions of TODAY serve a different purpose than unions of a few decades ago.

Point being, it is not solely the unions' fault that GM is in the position they're in. MANAGEMENT (when times were good) established the wages, and has also been the one driving the bus, making right turns and wrong turns along the way. While the unions/members DO have some "power" (no doubt) think of it as a government (since it's such a mega-corporation anyway) ... YES it's supposed to be like a "democratic" environment, but really, how often do we the public get to tell the gov't to jump, and they ask "how high"?? Keep in mind, $h!t usually does roll down hill, and unless you actually work on the line, I don't think you'd know the real issues that are NOT "benefits" to working there.
Good points...except. Being in a union is more "socialist" than "democratic". And when a union can cripple a company like GM by deciding to strike (extort) instead of doing the jobs they are paid very well to do is total B.S. All that does is hurt America. Bottom line. Nobody ever said working on an assembly line was fun, or easy. Then again, either is being a Marine. (one is overpaid, the other is grossly underpaid) But you know what you are getting into when you sign up. Guess its a good thing our military aren't in a union huh? Where the hell would this country be if ALL jobs were union? Not a pretty image. I'd rather be an individual than to sell my soul to a union. They have outlived thier usefullness. Now all they do is drive up prices and force American companies to outsource to try and make a buck. (which is the reason they are in buisness to begin with, no?) American unions, the best thing to ever happen to India and China.

Last edited by christianjax; 10-05-2007 at 08:48 AM.
christianjax is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 04:45 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
I hate to break it to you, but this whole country IS a Union...the "United States"...
And the only reason the Gov't doesn't jump when we say is simply the lack of solidarity among U.S. citizens these days. But it wasn't always this way, people used to be less complacent and rally for what they believed in, and not just verbal support.
I guess all those people rallying for civil rights in D.C. in the '60's were extorting the Gov't huh?...

Unions are Democratic in working, though some think their cause is socialistic, but people have lost sight of the American Dream...and it really shows.

Originally posted by christianjax:
well when you are paying the union what they extort from you as a company, can you blame them?
PS: Mabye you didn't know that the average transplant (Honda, Toyota etc) makes very nearly the same wages and in some cases better health care than Domestic's...but they are just now getting a fair number of retirees.

Last edited by 90rocz; 10-06-2007 at 08:29 AM.
90rocz is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 05:54 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by 90rocz
I hate to break it to you, but this whole country IS a Union...the "United States"...
And the only reason the Gov't doesn't jump when we say is simply the lack of solidarity among U.S. citizens these days. But it wasn't always this way, people used to be less complacent and rally for what they believed in, and not just verbal support.
I guess all those people rallying for civil rights in D.C. in the '60's were extorting the Gov't huh?...

Unions are Democratic in working, though some think their cause is socialistic, but people have lost sight of the American Dream...and it really shows.


PS: Mabye you didn't know that the average transplant (Honda, Toyota etc) makes very nearly the same wages and in some cases better health care than Domestic's...but they are just now getting a fair number of retirees.
No you didn't. I know the "United States" is a union of the states. But other than that, what pray tell is any other similarities between the United States and the UAW???? Who is the country's "Shop Steward"? When was the last time citizens of the country went on strike? (and NO a protest is NOT a strike. It doesn't shut down the country when there is a protest.) And this country doesn't have silly rules like a union does.
Quick story. I was on a union movie set watching a gaffer hang a light for a shot. He was up on a ladder and his tool tray was on the ground. I saw that he needed a screwdriver for what he was trying to do. So being a decent and helpful person, I handed him the screwdriver. He said "I can't take that from you." I was stunned. He then climbed down the ladder and grabbed the exact screwdriver I just tried to hand him. How is that productive?? That is the union's idea of giving the company the most productivity??? That's just ONE example of the stupidity of unions. If you want bang for you buck productivity, DON'T HAVE A UNION. If you want people that pace themselves to the lowest common denominator to protect their worth, by all means go union.

Last edited by christianjax; 10-08-2007 at 10:58 AM.
christianjax is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 09:58 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Ok, we get your point ... you hate unions ... are we done yet??
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 11:02 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
I shall preach from the mountain tops until everyone agrees that unions are unnesseccary and that they are a parasite on the productivity of American progress.
christianjax is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 12:26 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Andy30thZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 118
Originally Posted by christianjax
And all you unions guys out there reading this know this is true. You're just affraid that if enough people gripe about what your unions have done to this country, you'll loose your gravy train.
Originally Posted by christianjax
yes, by all means, I'm not attacking anyone here because they are in a union. It is the organization of the UNION that I despise and blame.

You're a funny guy.
Andy30thZ is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 12:33 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by Andy30thZ
You're a funny guy.
Hey I'm in town all week, try the buffet.

That wasn't an attack on union workers, I was just pointing out the fact that unions are indefensible.
christianjax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jazsun
Cars For Sale
0
12-29-2014 12:14 PM
Lederman1976
Cars For Sale
0
11-30-2014 05:21 AM
bossco
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
4
11-29-2014 10:18 AM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
11-24-2014 03:37 PM



Quick Reply: Canadian Car Plant 1 closed due to strike



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.