2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Camaro Concept:z28 Vs.ss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2006, 11:01 PM
  #31  
Disciple
 
OctaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Chicagoland, IL www.5thGen.org
Posts: 873
Yay I get to say it....

"Any Chevy can be an SS, but only a Camaro can be a Z28."

OctaneZ28 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 03:57 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
jaymac332's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by FS3800
bigger engine alone does not make a car the top dog
Yeah, but that has to say somethin. There are plenty of other components that would make a car a performer, but I would have wonder if there is anything more important than the engine? There are always things like suspension and transmission etc., but the engine has to be the biggest part of the equation...especially back in the 1960s, the pride of the muscle car era. You could say that what seperates a base Corvette from a Z06 is more than just an engine, in which I agree totally, but you have to admit that what gives the Z06 most of its edge is that monster 7 liter engine. Besides that, didnt the SS cost more as well? I know, I know, your gonna tell me that cost doesnt make a car top dog either...but it does certainly say something, and you cant ignore that Chevy chose the SS to be higher priced for a reason.
jaymac332 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 10:53 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
I saw a '70 LS6 SS 454 Chevelle the other day, and the first thing I thought was, "Damn too bad for him. I wouldn't want a SS because it's just an appearance package. GM slaps the SS badge on everything these days anyway, so it's played out. I'd rather have a '70 Malibu."

HOTCIVIC is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:02 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by HOTCIVIC
I saw a '70 LS6 SS 454 Chevelle the other day, and the first thing I thought was, "Damn too bad for him. I wouldn't want a SS because it's just an appearance package. GM slaps the SS badge on everything these days anyway, so it's played out. I'd rather have a '70 Malibu."

Minneapolis. December.

I'm sure that you didn't see it driving to the local 7/11 for a gallon of 2% milk.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:04 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Minneapolis. December.

I'm sure that you didn't see it driving to the local 7/11 for a gallon of 2% milk.
It's been warm and there's no snow on the ground here yet.
HOTCIVIC is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:09 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by jaymac332
... didnt the SS cost more as well? I know, I know, your gonna tell me that cost doesnt make a car top dog either...but it does certainly say something, and you cant ignore that Chevy chose the SS to be higher priced for a reason.
An excellent point. That argument has been discussed before and has merrit. However, please keep in mind, the very first production "SS" was a 6-cylinder. Besides with "today's Chevrolet", the top model in price is sometimes the SS and sometimes the LT2.

Performance comes in all shapes and sizes, and "SS" has always combined performance with comfort and luxury. For instance you could order A/C with a Camaro SS in 1967-69; however you couldn't order it with a Z/28. Want an automatic transmission? No problem, SS has that option... however Z/28 does not. (Prior to 1970.)

Which is "top dog" is really not that important. This is why I said earlier in this thread:
Originally Posted by jg95z28
SS is the all-options (luxury) performance model.

Z/28 is the all-out race model.

Just leave it at that.
When you think of it, they're both "top dogs" in their own way; just on different planes. Some prefer one over the other. There's nothing wrong with that IMO.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 12:52 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
jaymac332's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by jg95z28
An excellent point. That argument has been discussed before and has merrit. However, please keep in mind, the very first production "SS" was a 6-cylinder. Besides with "today's Chevrolet", the top model in price is sometimes the SS and sometimes the LT2.

Performance comes in all shapes and sizes, and "SS" has always combined performance with comfort and luxury. For instance you could order A/C with a Camaro SS in 1967-69; however you couldn't order it with a Z/28. Want an automatic transmission? No problem, SS has that option... however Z/28 does not. (Prior to 1970.)

Which is "top dog" is really not that important. This is why I said earlier in this thread:


When you think of it, they're both "top dogs" in their own way; just on different planes. Some prefer one over the other. There's nothing wrong with that IMO.
Hey, yeah I agree totally. In fact, I in some ways like the Z28 better. When I was looking around for a first car, I actually had the Z28 on my mind, not the SS. I love both though, wouldnt mind having either or. What is "top dog" anyway? The fastest? The best handler? Most luxurious? Highest dollar? The SS was faster than the Z28 right? It was also priced higher as well. And you mentioned that the SS also had higher luxury? Well, I think that in my opinion that puts SS as the top...on paper at least. They were never that different anyway, were they? They were reletivley close in performance. Ah, I guess Im talking myself in circles. There is no real right answer is there? I guess all Im trying to say is that no one should get bent out of shape if the SS is picked to be a better performer than the Z28, because we all know that the Z28 will still blow people away.
jaymac332 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 01:08 PM
  #38  
Bert02SS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Bottom line: The good folks at Chevrolet will eventually be informing us regarding IF and WHEN an SS model will be arriving. And also WHAT features it will sport. The Z-28 will no doubt be released first as the performance model, IMHO.
 
Old 12-11-2006, 01:55 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by Bert02SS
Bottom line: The good folks at Chevrolet will eventually be informing us regarding IF and WHEN an SS model will be arriving. And also WHAT features it will sport. The Z-28 will no doubt be released first as the performance model, IMHO.
Actually as I understand it, the Z/28 will be 12-18 months behind the SS and base Camaro.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 01:56 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
stars1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,123
Actually this conversation really has no point, the Z28 has already be chosen as the Z06 of the Camaro line, expect it the second year of production….there I said it…….the end……
stars1010 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 01:57 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
stars1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,123


We both pounced on that one didn’t we JG?
stars1010 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 03:47 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by stars1010


We both pounced on that one didn’t we JG?
Ya think?
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 04:34 PM
  #43  
Bert02SS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by stars1010
Actually this conversation really has no point, the Z28 has already be chosen as the Z06 of the Camaro line, expect it the second year of production….there I said it…….the end……
You mean the first year's production will be base Camaros exclusively? That doesn't seem quite right to me.
 
Old 12-11-2006, 04:46 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Ultra_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 511
If you just owned a 1996 Z28/SS, your partisan wars would be irrelevent. The only 4th gen that had both monikers. 1997 and onward, it was only called SS.

For 1996, the SS was 305 HP/335 Tq. (310 with performance exhaust), whereas the Z28 was rated at 285 HP/325 Tq . In 1997, the SS was the only offering with an LT4 option (335 HP/350 Tq)

And to recall..
when the SS was ordered from the dealer, it opened a suite of additional options NOT AVAILABLE TO THE Z28:

Option Code: WU8
1) Suspension upgrade (Level I or Level II) which included Eibach springs (lower by at least 1 1/2"), Bilstein shocks, 1LE sway bars, stiffer durometer bushings on the tranny and control arms.
2) Performance exhaust (3" post-y-pipe) w' SLP 2OTL (100% stainless steel)
3) Torsen Differential, (Auburn for later years) with AAM cover (recirculates diff oil through a cooling area)
4) Hurst shifter w' leather wrap **** (6-speed)
5) BF Goodrich Comp T/A 275-40ZR-17 tires, w' ZR-1 wheels
6) Optional BFG R1 racing tires on their own wheels
7) Synthetic Oil Option (Castrol)
8) Oil Cooler

and the other obvious cosmetic items:
Functional hoodscoop, different rear spoiler (pronounced uplift), SS badging, ZR1 wheels.

Last edited by Ultra_Dog; 12-11-2006 at 05:30 PM.
Ultra_Dog is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 05:40 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
stars1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,123
Originally Posted by Bert02SS
You mean the first year's production will be base Camaros exclusively? That doesn't seem quite right to me.
Base Camaros and Base V8 Camaros (SS) first year,

The Z28 will be out after that with between 400 to 500 hp
stars1010 is offline  


Quick Reply: Camaro Concept:z28 Vs.ss



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.