2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro discussion for body kits, paint and stripe care, seats, dash, gauges, car audio, etc.

[Interior] New Interior Photos of 2009 Chevy Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
Jalopnik's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5
Cool New Interior Photos of 2009 Chevy Camaro

Don't know if y'all have seen these -- new interior photos of the 2009 Chevy Camaro



-----------
Ray Wert
Editor-in-Chief - Jalopnik
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #2  
SGMZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 47
From: Culpeper, Va
That looks MUCH better than what I thought it would.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #3  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
It's obviously still laden with duct tape (and wow - check out the cardboard floor mats )... but still looks pretty nice so far. I'm reserving final judgement until a true production interior is released. I like the design of the console gauges in particular - they look to be very easy to read. Overall though, it sure looks like this is a 'base' or V6 variant, judging by the wheels and lack of rear spoiler. I'm sure there are more niceties on the 'LT' or upgraded cars. Is that a cupholder I see in the console?
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #4  
VladimirSteel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 470
From: Stillwater, OK
i like almost everything but the stupid freaking speedo and tach ... i guess i knew it was going to be like that though, and i guess its nothing that HUD wont make me forget about. That radio does look hard to find an aftermarket one to make look right, but i guess all cars are like that now days. all things considered though it looks pretty dang good.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:49 PM
  #5  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by VladimirSteel
i like almost everything but the stupid freaking speedo and tach ... i guess i knew it was going to be like that though, and i guess its nothing that HUD wont make me forget about. That radio does look hard to find an aftermarket one to make look right, but i guess all cars are like that now days. all things considered though it looks pretty dang good.
Agreed. Everything I've read on here makes me think the car will be offered with an optional HUD... which makes me not care much how nice and modern the speedo might be. If there is also an option for factory nav, that will open up a lot of choices there as well so the unique faceplate might not matter much.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #6  
96SSConv#2033's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 126
From: New Orleans, LA
Looks like the cup holders are right behind the shifter again. And the stereo looks like a pain to put in a NAV/DVD unit.

Oh well, guess I'm getting a Vette instead.

B
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #7  
Tkc23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 90
From: Phoenix
very pretty love it

dont let cup holders influence your decision :P
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #8  
09camaroZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 130
From: long island, ny
i really like this interior i hope they put a nav in and have an option were the color on the door panel and color around tach and speedo could be the color of your car
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #9  
Big_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 207
From: Merrillville, IN
did anyone notice the torque gauge? either this is an extremely stout 6 cylinder :P, or its one of the v8s because it goes up to 370 lb ft it looks like. im all for full instrumentation though and ill have to put my vote in as yes on console gauges being cool. also do the gauges have a light ring (almost to match the headlight halos) or are they just the shiniest chrome rings ever?

Last edited by Big_Z; Jan 26, 2008 at 04:14 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #10  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
There should be a torque gauge somewhere in there.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #11  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Big_Z
did anyone notice the torque gauge? either this is a very stout 6 cylinder, or its one of the v8s because it goes up to 370 lb ft it looks like. im all for full instrumentation though and ill have to put my vote in as yes on console gauges being cool. also do the gauges have a light ring (almost to match the headlight halos) or are they just the shiniest chrome rings ever?
Even if the V8 Camaro ended up with the L76 (391 ft lb TQ), that gauge would/will be inadequate. If the car pictured is a V6, and IF the V6 is the 3.6 (290 ft lb), it makes a little more sense. It could also be - that the gauge face is not a production-car-ready graphic. That's the problem with trying to interpret too much from these unauthorized spy pix. Still though - it's cool to have a Torque gauge... something that would cause massive embarrassment for the typical Honda Civic owner

One other thing. It appears the two gauges most people care most about (temp, fuel) are right up there with the speedo/tach. That should help those who were not in favor of console gauges.

As for the speedo halo - again that's a problem with trying to understand the gauges' appearance and lighting. The pix are horrible in that regard... and how do we know, a trim piece (such as a glare blocker) is not missing from that picture? Perhaps the car was IN that garage for some dash work to be done. We simply will not really know what these parts and components really look like, until their production release.

Last edited by BigDarknFast; Jan 26, 2008 at 04:25 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #12  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Even if the V8 Camaro ended up with the L76 (391 ft lb TQ), that gauge would/will be inadequate. If the car pictured is a V6, and IF the V6 is the 3.6 (290 ft lb), it makes a little more sense. It could also be - that the gauge face is not a production-car-ready graphic. That's the problem with trying to interpret too much from these unauthorized spy pix. Still though - it's cool to have a Torque gauge... something that would cause massive embarrassment for the typical Honda Civic owner
The increments don't follow a linear equation.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #13  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by number77
The increments don't follow a linear equation.
Understood. I guess I was only going by the MAX increment on the gauge - which LOOKS like it might say 370 ft lb. (Again - just speculation, based on extremely blurry and ill-focused pix)
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:31 PM
  #14  
j18369's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28
What exactly is the point of the torque gauge? Not like I'm going to be looking down there as I'm slamming on the gas to see what kind of torque I'm getting while I slam into a tree.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #15  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Understood. I guess I was only going by the MAX increment on the gauge - which LOOKS like it might say 370 ft lb. (Again - just speculation, based on extremely blurry and ill-focused pix)
If they did go in intuitive increments it should read 360ft lb. Which would be more confusing. I mean, they don't HAVE to be linear, but it would make sense for them to be legibly read by a drive without having to do math. Spooky stuff.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.