2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro discussion for body kits, paint and stripe care, seats, dash, gauges, car audio, etc.

[Interior] Height & Width for dirvers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 06:08 AM
  #16  
b4z's Avatar
b4z
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 61
From: chas., s.c. U.S.A.
I'm a long legged 6'8" and there are additional factors that go into how a vehcile works for a tall person, other than just leg and headroom numbers.

I didn't buy a 4th gen because:
The windshield header was in my forehead, and made it hard to see overhead stoplights. 4th gen windshield was raked back 68 degrees compared to 3rd gens 64 degrees.
4th gen had a low rearview mirror, blocking my forward vision.

Looking at the 5th gen I think I should be able to fit.
But the rearview mirror looks low and with the low area above it i may not be able to raise it up like i have in my GTO.
Looks like an improvemnet over 4th gen though.
A pillar looks huge and will probably block some of my side vision.
That is always a little scary when dealing with pedestrians in crosswalks.
Side roof header looks like it will be close to my head but windshield header is lifted up and away which should help with upward vision for stoplights.
This is an improvement over the concept and the 4th gen.

Hope this helps some of the tall people.
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Failed sales slogan: The new Camaro...built for fat chicks.
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #18  
Good Ph.D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
6'8" 280, I got in just fine. Had to let the seat all the way down and back to get really comfortable, but I liked it. Headroom was fine even with the sunroof.

Of course, I would, as usual, have to stop 15 feet before traffic lights, but you know...
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #19  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
i just hope the seats go low enough.
Old Feb 1, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #20  
79Zee28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 114
From: North Jersey
I just sat in one this past weekend in Philly. Thanks for all of those who made it possible. I'm 5' 10" and felt great in the front. I especially liked that I was not shoulder to shoulder with the passenger. I would probably NOT order a sunroof because it really does cut down the headroom. The sun visor is really tiny as is the mirror in it. It would not really work too well if you moved it to the driver window to block the sun. I did like the view out the side view mirror. You get a great view of the rear quarter! As far as the back seats, they are really tight. My 2nd Gen is MUCH better. I understand that we are not buying this car for the back seat. However, if you have kids and want to take them for a ride, it will be really tight. I would suggest a rear seat cushion that indents (as opposed to being flat) to gain more rear head room. I would even like to see (at least) the passenger seat automatically move forward when you exit the rear seat. I did like the flip down rear seat. Although the opening of the trunk is small, the trunk is a nice size. With the rear seat folded down, you can actually carry some stuff. I went to compare the interior size to a Challenger that was at the show. The Challenger does indeed have the most room inside. The back is the most pleasant and the trunk is huge. I prefer the Camaro overall but, the Challenger is by far the most 4 passenger/cargo friendly.
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #21  
bigsjk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Gripenfelter
Failed sales slogan: The new Camaro...built for fat chicks.
You got a problem with fat chicks buddy?
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 12:18 AM
  #22  
sui_winbolo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 39
From: Bottineau, ND
I feel sorry for you tall guys.

I'm 6'1", I'm glad I don't have those issues with vehicles or anything like that.

Though I'm sure it's awesome being that tall for playing basketball.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 12:45 AM
  #23  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
I got to check out a base SS the other day, and the power seat seems to go VERY low. I'm pretty sure that with it in its lowest position, it allows more head room than in my 4th-gen . The seat ALSO goes very HIGH ... high enough my head was getting rammed into the roof!! Overall, I'd say there is a feeling of more room inside the 5th-gen than the 4th, although this wasn't a side-by-side or back-to-back comparison .
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #24  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
don't forget pete the manual seats in the 4th gen are lower then your power one.....
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 08:15 AM
  #25  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
I remember this thread

I've posted my thoughts on my fitting in the Camaro elsewhere, but for the sake of repetition, I had no problem with getting comfortable in the Camaro. The door sills are a bit taller than what I'm used to, but that just tells me that the car was built very strong.

I fit in the Camaro driver's seat better than I fit into my wife's 04 Impala. I do wish I would have tested out the passenger side since the front passenger seat of the Impala is dreadful to me

And to answer my own question from once upon a time, the Camaro is a lot easier to get into than a C6 Corvette. The driving position is more comfortable also.
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #26  
woodsripper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
I am 6' 3", 195 lbs with a 36" inseam. I work for a supplier to the 2010 Camaro. We had several cars at our company and I have spent two weeks driving a V-8 manual trans car. The head room is adequate for me, but someone who has a taller torso would not fit very well. The car we had did not have a sunroof, but the steering wheel did tilt/telescope. Overall, the car was comfortable and fun to drive. My only complaint is the rather large blind spot over your shoulders. It is difficult to see if someone is next to you when making a lane change. Motorcycles will be definitely hard to see.
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #27  
b4z's Avatar
b4z
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 61
From: chas., s.c. U.S.A.
I'm more concerned with the rear view mirror and top of the b pillar blocking my vision.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ken S
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
32
Nov 25, 2002 05:09 PM
rskrause
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
8
Oct 25, 2002 03:11 PM
Decromin
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
18
Oct 21, 2002 09:09 PM
No4nRice
Appearance
13
Oct 9, 2002 07:38 PM
Chad96SS
Appearance
0
Sep 27, 2002 11:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 PM.