2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro discussion for body kits, paint and stripe care, seats, dash, gauges, car audio, etc.

[Interior] Height & Width for dirvers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #1  
bigsjk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
From: Toronto, Canada
Height & Width for dirvers

What is the range of drivers that can comfortably fit in the car? (height & width)

Will there be tilt & telescoping for the steering wheel?

Will there be huge side pockets on the doors to limit the hip room?
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
silverghost00's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Originally Posted by bigsjk
What is the range of drivers that can comfortably fit in the car? (height & width)

Will there be tilt & telescoping for the steering wheel?

Will there be huge side pockets on the doors to limit the hip room?
Rick wagnor is over 6ft (6ft 7 if I remember correctly)and he fit just fine

Yes There will be tilt & telescoping for the steering wheel

Nope, no huge side pockets. Here is what the interior looks like

Old Aug 24, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #3  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by bigsjk
What is the range of drivers that can comfortably fit in the car? (height & width)
A couple of the disciples are over 6' tall, here is a post made by one...

Originally Posted by sselie
I'm 6'1" and there was ample room for me, as well as a couple of the other guys who are taller than I am. To my mind, there was a very open feel to the cabin while sitting in the driver's seat. It is more of an upright seating position than that of my 4th Gen.
If your height is in your torso, the headroom will be a bit tighter than if your height is in your legs. There is a ton of legroom - so much so that I really had to move the seat far up from the back position. I have a 33" inseam, if that gives you a better perspective...
My only regret was not bringing a helmet to Milford so that I could check out headroom while wearing one!
It should be OK!

Best regardSS,

Elie
The other questions where answered above.
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 12:53 AM
  #4  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
how about for those of us that are wider than average...
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 03:00 PM
  #5  
Grape Ape's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by AdioSS
how about for those of us that are wider than average...
I have no idea how wide you are, but I think that you are part of a bigger (if you'll pardon the pun) demographic than the tall folks and GM must know that...
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
I don't know my exact measurements and this isn't a dating service
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #7  
Evotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by bigsjk
What is the range of drivers that can comfortably fit in the car? (height & width)

Will there be tilt & telescoping for the steering wheel?

Will there be huge side pockets on the doors to limit the hip room?
This is how I am comparing currently...

Test subject: Me
Height: 6' 4"
Weight: *cough* 235 lbs

2006 Evo 2010 Camaro

Front head room 40 " ---- 37.4"
Rear head room 37 " ---- 35.3"
Front shoulder room 54 " ---- 56.9"
Rear shoulder room 53 " ---- 42.5"
Front hip room 51 " ----
Rear hip room 50 " ----
Front leg room 43.0 "---- 42.4"
Rear leg room 36.6 " ---- 29.9"

As you can see from my crappy attempt at a chart.... They are fairly close in the front cockpit area.
With my seat all the way back leg room is not too much of an issue. If I slouch, my knees are bent a little more than I like but not bad for a manual tranny. Long drives are a different story.

Not sure about the shoulder room numbers, the Evo has Recaros' and even though I am a bit soft in the middle the fit is perfect.

Head room is not an issue at all due to the seats sitting very low.

Rear is a different story, but I don't sit back there so it's not my problem.

Overall the Camaro is much wider, so I can't see too much of an isuue side to side.

I could be wrong. After all... My wife tells me I'm wrong 99.9% of the time.

Last edited by Evotion; Sep 19, 2008 at 01:27 AM. Reason: Oops
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
missmy79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 63
my big thing is that my left arm should comfortably rest on the arm rest and not be forced to the window sill. I really felt cramped in the 4th get in that regard. It's actually what kept me from buying one.
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Chris Frezza mentioned this in the Podcast that was released today.

Let me tell you, there is more room in [the Camaro] then there is in my [C6] Vette.
He's 6'-4" and well over 225 lbs. He got in and out comfortably. He moved the seat back as far as it would go, and he actually had to move it forward again to put his feet on the pedals properly. Headroom was fine. The tilt and telescoping steering wheel settings had enough movement so that driving position was comfortable for him and he could see all gauges clearly.

Big folks, worry not. You will fit fine unless you are gargantuan, and if that is the case, you probably won't fit in many cars anyway.
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #10  
Black5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 138
From: Chicago
I would like to see the shoulder room numbers of the 5th gen compared to the 4th gen. This is a big concern to me. I have excellent shoulder room in the 4th gen, the C6 is a little tight but very acceptable, and the C5 sucks.
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #11  
Evotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by Black5thgen
I would like to see the shoulder room numbers of the 5th gen compared to the 4th gen. This is a big concern to me. I have excellent shoulder room in the 4th gen, the C6 is a little tight but very acceptable, and the C5 sucks.
1996 Camaro Interior specs


Front Headroom (in.) 38.00
Rear Headroom (in.) 39.00
Front Legroom (in.) 43.00
Rear Legroom (in.) 26.80
Front Shoulder Room (in.) 57.40
Rear Shoulder Room (in.) 43.50
Front Hip Room (in.) 52.80
Rear Hip Room (in.) 43.70

http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/sp...maro&trimid=-1
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #12  
bigsjk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by JasonD
Big folks, worry not. You will fit fine unless you are gargantuan, and if that is the case, you probably won't fit in many cars anyway.
ummm...I kinda am "gargantuan" (yup, no PC here!) at 350 lbs...but I was quite comfortable in my 1998 Regal and am mostly comfortable my 2005 Allure.

Anybody know the interior specs against a '98 Regal GS?
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #13  
bigsjk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
From: Toronto, Canada
Just drove a G8 and hope these bad things are not in the Camaro

Hi All,

Well I am car shopping as my lease is up on my Allure.

I drove a G8 yesterday and I have to say two very negative things that I hope are not in the Camaro:
  1. Pedals are waaaay too close together...I actually got my foot (ok size 14 but that shouldn't matter) stuck trying to brake.
  2. Tilt/telescoping lever at the bottom of the column and way back, not very easy to use....also one lever for both. I had a hard time adjusting the wheel because the damn lever was way out of reach, and also one lever for both?
Other than that the G8 is a very nice car...and I only drove the V6...plenty of power.
My 2 cents.
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #14  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
I think there's a modern trend in vehicle design to include more vital room for occupants in a crash. More head room, more room between the dash and the knees, more distance between the head and roof rails and window glass, more adjustability in steering wheels and pedals.

The GTI, which is a classically "small" car, that also has all the new safety requirements including elevated hood height, high beltline on the doors, etc...I can't push in the clutch when the seat is all the way back or reach the wheel when it's all the way in. I'm 6'4" and 230lbs right now, and most of that is legs.

The Camaro looks as though it will be accommodating with all the new safety requirements. It's a much bigger car than the GTI with seemingly more upright dimensions on a longer and wider chassis. I'm thinking I could possibly feel like I'm driving a big kid's car again looking over that long hood. And that's a great feeling.

The 4th gen had extreme limitations making it almost unsafe for larger/taller drivers. The driver's seat (with no headrest) had to be leaned back in order to accommodate taller heads and bigger bellies. The roofline tapered inward making the t-top or roof rail uncomfortably close. The steering wheel did not telescope, making it uncomfortable for taller/bigger drivers to reach when they were practically sitting in the back seat.

In other words, vehicle design has come a long way. The 4th gen was designed well over 13 years prior to the design of the 5th gen. You'll be fine
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:05 AM
  #15  
slingshot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 132
If you like the car just make yourself fit, maybe with a few modifications...tilting the seat back, moving it all the way back. I mean, I am 6' 6" 230 lbs, and i actually fit pretty nicely in my 93....i know the seat foam is worn in, but hey. I would still buy the new camaro even if I had to squeeze in a little...its a price to pay to drive a nice, fast car.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.